The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


FOA DTA

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby DTA » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:25 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Me Ed wrote:DTA,

you need to show more compassion -

I don't know what the hell some of you are doing in the CyProb... honestly!

It’s like watching Laurel & Hardy! :roll:



Oi leave my fellow cypriot, alone he is allowed to express his opinion any way he want,

And he is more of a true cypriot than you are. ;-)
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Kikapu » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:25 pm

DTA wrote:
Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.


The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.


Also do not forget, that the remaining "Vakif" land was sold by Denktash and Küçük for the sum of £1.5 million pounds around 1960, which the British have the receipt for the "Bill of Sale".!
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Get Real! » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:25 pm

PUT YOUR GLASSES ON...



ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

Now beat it!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby B25 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:25 pm

DTA wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
DTA wrote:
Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.


The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.

It's your pea-brain that is challenged...


The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne

ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

ARTICLE 2I .
Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the 5th November, 1914, will acquire British nationality subject to the conditions laid down in the local law, and will thereupon lose their Turkish nationality. They will, however, have the right to opt for Turkish nationality within two years from the coming into force of the present Treaty, provided that they leave Cyprus within twelve months after having so opted.

Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the coming into force of the present Treaty who, at that date, have acquired or are in process of acquiring British nationality in consequence of a request made in accordance with the local law, will also thereupon lose their Turkish nationality.
It is understood that the Government of Cyprus will be entitled to refuse British nationality to inhabitants of the island who, being Turkish nationals, had formerly acquired another nationality without the consent of the Turkish Government.


http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne

Now run along...


What the hell are you taking about who is talking about the treaty of lausanne? I am talking about the british taking land that didnt belong to them and giving it to the Greek cypriots.


Well who do you think owned it before the Ottomans came and took it. The only reason you and your sort have any land in Cyprus is for this very reason.

My god the audacity of you people.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby Get Real! » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:28 pm

DTA wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Me Ed wrote:DTA,

you need to show more compassion -

I don't know what the hell some of you are doing in the CyProb... honestly!

It’s like watching Laurel & Hardy! :roll:

Oi leave my fellow cypriot, alone he is allowed to express his opinion any way he want,

And he is more of a true cypriot than you are. ;-)

You’re a couple of half-witted Charlies with the combined IQ of an empty flask! :roll:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby B25 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:30 pm

Get Real! wrote:
DTA wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Me Ed wrote:DTA,

you need to show more compassion -

I don't know what the hell some of you are doing in the CyProb... honestly!

It’s like watching Laurel & Hardy! :roll:

Oi leave my fellow cypriot, alone he is allowed to express his opinion any way he want,

And he is more of a true cypriot than you are. ;-)

You’re a couple of half-witted Charlies with the combined IQ of an empty flask! :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Where do you get these comments from, man you crack me up :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby DTA » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:32 pm

Get Real! wrote:PUT YOUR GLASSES ON...



ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

Now beat it!


So annexation means the suspension of property right?

as you aint that smart, i will warn you to:
Be careful how you answer this one.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Get Real! » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:32 pm

They come straight from the heart... :)
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby DTA » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:35 pm

B25 wrote:
DTA wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
DTA wrote:
Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.


The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.

It's your pea-brain that is challenged...


The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne

ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

ARTICLE 2I .
Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the 5th November, 1914, will acquire British nationality subject to the conditions laid down in the local law, and will thereupon lose their Turkish nationality. They will, however, have the right to opt for Turkish nationality within two years from the coming into force of the present Treaty, provided that they leave Cyprus within twelve months after having so opted.

Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the coming into force of the present Treaty who, at that date, have acquired or are in process of acquiring British nationality in consequence of a request made in accordance with the local law, will also thereupon lose their Turkish nationality.
It is understood that the Government of Cyprus will be entitled to refuse British nationality to inhabitants of the island who, being Turkish nationals, had formerly acquired another nationality without the consent of the Turkish Government.


http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne

Now run along...


What the hell are you taking about who is talking about the treaty of lausanne? I am talking about the british taking land that didnt belong to them and giving it to the Greek cypriots.


Well who do you think owned it before the Ottomans came and took it. The only reason you and your sort have any land in Cyprus is for this very reason.

My god the audacity of you people.


The Italians had it and treated you GCs as surfs, did you not know this little bit of Cyprus history?

I see you show your true colours now you are not trying to buy land on the cheap.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Me Ed » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:35 pm

Get Real! wrote:
DTA wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Me Ed wrote:DTA,

you need to show more compassion -

I don't know what the hell some of you are doing in the CyProb... honestly!

It’s like watching Laurel & Hardy! :roll:

Oi leave my fellow cypriot, alone he is allowed to express his opinion any way he want,

And he is more of a true cypriot than you are. ;-)

You’re a couple of half-witted Charlies with the combined IQ of an empty flask! :roll:

Unlike you GR and co, we are not the half-wits that put Cyprus in its current state.
User avatar
Me Ed
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest