Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

let me give you a little history lesson:

You've got a looooooooooong way to go before you start giving people "history lessons" in here newbie, so keep your junk to yourself.

[DTA]

60.9% - Greek/Armenian/Maronite Cypriots
12.3% - Turkish Cypriots
0.5% - Others
26.3% - State/Church Land

Source: Department of Lands and Surveys (refer to Annex 14 in Volume II of the "Memorandum by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus" submitted to the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Commons, 27 February 1987.

I ask you for a un-bias primary source and you give me a Ministry from teh ROC

you are a complete and utter joker... seriously you dont annoy me you just make me laugh.

[DTA]

let me give you a little history lesson:

You've got a looooooooooong way to go before you start giving people "history lessons" in here newbie, so keep your junk to yourself.

Quote me something (in this thread) I got wrong 'oldie'.

[Get Real!]

I ask you for a un-bias primary source and you give me a Ministry from teh ROC

you are a complete and utter joker... seriously you dont annoy me you just make me laugh.

Hey dufus, the Department of Lands and Surveys of Cyprus is the ONLY credible source when it comes to land in Cyprus…

http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/DLS/dls.nsf/d ... enDocument

…and you’d better believe it!

[DTA]

Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.

The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.

[DTA]

DTA,

you need to show more compassion - would you have the RoC have refugees sleeping on the streets, only a low life would look to profit from a situation like this.

There is a settler in my property so I have the moral higher ground on you when it comes to compensation.

Can you tell who or what organisation this settler is paying rent to?

Me and my family will return after reunification, but in the mean time all I want for from Turkey to formally recognise that the land is mine and I want the rent paid into my account.

would you have the RoC have refugees sleeping on the streets, only a low life would look to profit from a situation like this.

Read my post again, I have stated that even now I do not want to throw the refugee on the street. so what the hell are you playing at?

There is a settler in my property so I have the moral higher ground on you when it comes to compensation.

Can you tell who or what organisation this settler is paying rent to

I have no Idea, but I do not think you have the morale high ground at all either you want compensation or you dont. if you have been prevented from using your land then you are due compensation as we are also due.

Ps I dont want the compensation from the refugees, I want it from the ROC.

[DTA]

I ask you for a un-bias primary source and you give me a Ministry from teh ROC

you are a complete and utter joker... seriously you dont annoy me you just make me laugh.

Hey dufus, the Department of Lands and Surveys of Cyprus is the ONLY credible source when it comes to land in Cyprus…

http://www.moi.gov.cy/moi/DLS/dls.nsf/d ... enDocument

…and you’d better believe it!

You did not answer so I will simply post again:

I ask you for a un-bias primary source and you give me a Ministry from teh ROC

you are a complete and utter joker... seriously you dont annoy me you just make me laugh.

[Get Real!]

Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.

The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.

It's your pea-brain that is challenged...

The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne

ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

ARTICLE 2I .
Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the 5th November, 1914, will acquire British nationality subject to the conditions laid down in the local law, and will thereupon lose their Turkish nationality. They will, however, have the right to opt for Turkish nationality within two years from the coming into force of the present Treaty, provided that they leave Cyprus within twelve months after having so opted.

Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the coming into force of the present Treaty who, at that date, have acquired or are in process of acquiring British nationality in consequence of a request made in accordance with the local law, will also thereupon lose their Turkish nationality.
It is understood that the Government of Cyprus will be entitled to refuse British nationality to inhabitants of the island who, being Turkish nationals, had formerly acquired another nationality without the consent of the Turkish Government.

http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne

Now run along...

[Get Real!]

DTA,

you need to show more compassion -

I don't know what the hell some of you are doing in the CyProb... honestly!

It’s like watching Laurel & Hardy!

[DTA]

Someone should remind/inform you that the British stripped the Ottomans of most of this stolen “Vakif” land by setting the record straight when in 1944 they passed the "Immovable Property Law” which returned the great majority of this stolen land back to the Greek Cypriots over successive counter-confiscations.

The legally of which as I understand is being challenged... Ps none of the Vakif land is stolen to say so show just how little you actually know about your fellow cypriots.

It's your pea-brain that is challenged...

The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne

ARTICLE 20.

Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

ARTICLE 2I .
Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the 5th November, 1914, will acquire British nationality subject to the conditions laid down in the local law, and will thereupon lose their Turkish nationality. They will, however, have the right to opt for Turkish nationality within two years from the coming into force of the present Treaty, provided that they leave Cyprus within twelve months after having so opted.

Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the coming into force of the present Treaty who, at that date, have acquired or are in process of acquiring British nationality in consequence of a request made in accordance with the local law, will also thereupon lose their Turkish nationality.
It is understood that the Government of Cyprus will be entitled to refuse British nationality to inhabitants of the island who, being Turkish nationals, had formerly acquired another nationality without the consent of the Turkish Government.

http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne

Now run along...

What the hell are you taking about who is talking about the treaty of lausanne? I am talking about the british taking land that didnt belong to them and giving it to the Greek cypriots.