The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


No guarantees and no guarantors for the RoC.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby boulio » Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:56 pm

Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby YFred » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:02 pm

boulio wrote:
Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?

But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby boulio » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:09 pm

as you can see from turkish articles The turkish army cant gurantee there own democracy let alone another.stop bring up 40 year old arguments focus on today and tommorow.As you can see again turkey cannot guranntee her own democracy so cyprus will not allow a all out turkish guranntee.they caan be part a of a joint security scheme but that is it.now move on.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:15 pm

YFred wrote:
boulio wrote:
Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?

But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.


How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?

We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas. :roll: :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby YFred » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:23 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
YFred wrote:
boulio wrote:
Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?

But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.


How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?

We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas. :roll: :roll:

The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that. Given time, TCs will trust GCs and not require it, but it is a TC decision as to when it is no longer required. GC's insistance of controling what TCs can or cannot have will lead to partition by default.
Partition may not be a bad thing so long as TRNC is allowed into EU in it's own right. Annexation with Turkey may not be a forgone conclusion. That rather depends on our GC cousins.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Get Real! » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:34 pm

YFred wrote:The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that.

No it isn’t! TCs are NOT a country to be in a position make such decisions. The official national guarantor is the CNG whether you like it or not.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Kikapu » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:35 pm

YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
YFred wrote:
boulio wrote:
Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?

But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.


How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?

We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas. :roll: :roll:

The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that. Given time, TCs will trust GCs and not require it, but it is a TC decision as to when it is no longer required. GC's insistance of controling what TCs can or cannot have will lead to partition by default.
Partition may not be a bad thing so long as TRNC is allowed into EU in it's own right. Annexation with Turkey may not be a forgone conclusion. That rather depends on our GC cousins.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby boulio » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:35 pm

deniz wrote:

How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?

We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas.


thats why i say a joint nato/eu force with cypriot(g/c and t/c)participation.

you can have a brigade size forces with 3,000 troops defending the island.

six battalions of 500 troops:
1 cypriot
1 greek
1 turkish
3euro/nato (american,canadian,french)

rotate the the commander of the force on yearly basis.
1
Last edited by boulio on Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby YFred » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:36 pm

Get Real! wrote:
YFred wrote:The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that.

No it isn’t! TCs are NOT a country to be in a position make such decisions. The official national guarantor is the CNG whether you like it or not.

Keep up that mentality and it will be partition, old chap.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby YFred » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:37 pm

Kikapu wrote:
YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
YFred wrote:
boulio wrote:
Your words not mine "cypriot involvment


yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?

But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.


How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?

We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas. :roll: :roll:

The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that. Given time, TCs will trust GCs and not require it, but it is a TC decision as to when it is no longer required. GC's insistance of controling what TCs can or cannot have will lead to partition by default.
Partition may not be a bad thing so long as TRNC is allowed into EU in it's own right. Annexation with Turkey may not be a forgone conclusion. That rather depends on our GC cousins.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

All this prentend laugh will give you hernia one day, what?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests