Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
boulio wrote:Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
YFred wrote:boulio wrote:Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.
denizaksulu wrote:YFred wrote:boulio wrote:Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.
How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?
We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas.
YFred wrote:The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that.
YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:YFred wrote:boulio wrote:Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.
How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?
We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas.
The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that. Given time, TCs will trust GCs and not require it, but it is a TC decision as to when it is no longer required. GC's insistance of controling what TCs can or cannot have will lead to partition by default.
Partition may not be a bad thing so long as TRNC is allowed into EU in it's own right. Annexation with Turkey may not be a forgone conclusion. That rather depends on our GC cousins.
How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?
We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas.
Get Real! wrote:YFred wrote:The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that.
No it isn’t! TCs are NOT a country to be in a position make such decisions. The official national guarantor is the CNG whether you like it or not.
Kikapu wrote:YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:YFred wrote:boulio wrote:Your words not mine "cypriot involvment
yeah dimwit it means joint g/c/t/c participation.you are cypriot arent you?
But of course I am a cypriot. I certainly endured the gurantee of the GC NG between 63 and 72. I can vouche for their allround crapness. You are trying to square the circle. Cannot be done.
You are going round and round in circles with this one. 99% of the TCs will not accept anything other than Turkish guarantee no matter how you dress it up, even part of nato which she already is. Even mentioning eu is a total waste of time. They can't guarantee themselves never mind anybody else.
How do guarantees from Turkey make us an Independant Nation. EU role as guarantors might suffice. Dont you think?
We know the GCs will not accepts Turkeys role and we know TCs will not accept nothing less. What will we do? Wait for annexation, for I see no other result from this 'impasse'. Perhaps thats what the negotiators are negotiating for - Partition. Funny how the leaderws have the same ideas.
The guarantee for TCs is a TC decision. GCs cannot have a say in that. Given time, TCs will trust GCs and not require it, but it is a TC decision as to when it is no longer required. GC's insistance of controling what TCs can or cannot have will lead to partition by default.
Partition may not be a bad thing so long as TRNC is allowed into EU in it's own right. Annexation with Turkey may not be a forgone conclusion. That rather depends on our GC cousins.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests