The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


A victim of the Turkish Cypriot 'exchange' scam asks…

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby vaughanwilliams » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:17 pm

rigsby wrote:Me thinks you are a little biased


Me thinks you don't know what you are talking about. :wink:
User avatar
vaughanwilliams
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:54 pm

Postby boomerang » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:25 pm

vaughanwilliams wrote:
rigsby wrote:Me thinks you are a little biased


Me thinks you don't know what you are talking about. :wink:


me thinks a scummy's opinion is not worth pissing on, when on fire... :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby denizaksulu » Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:57 pm

vaughanwilliams wrote:
rigsby wrote:Yes you are right Malapapa what I don,t understand is why it,s not directed at the thieving scum who sold them the property/land in the first place


I rest my case.



I have said it over and over again, that the real guilty are those that allowed these sales to go on and on. Firstly the northern admin who profitted endlessly with their 'property dealer' dealings, then the property dealers themselves and some unscrupulous private 'eshdeger' owners.

I know personall y of some retired honest colleaugues of mine who were hoodwinked into buying 'off plan' 10 years ago at Esentepe. The developers have disappeared and all monies disappeared. They are still unfinished.

That NO action has ever (to my knowledge) against the real crooks truly amazes me.

Some tried to link me as supportive of the Orams. That is not the case.

All properties belong to their legal owners. Cyprus Republic Kochans. Period.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Malapapa » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:36 pm

rigsby wrote:Yes you are right Malapapa what I don,t understand is why it,s not directed at the thieving scum who sold them the property/land in the first place


These criminals are worthy of the highest contempt but they don't pretend to be anything other than barbarians (to us at least). It's no coincidence that, in the free part of Cyprus, calling someone a "Turk" is an insult.

But the greedy, gullible Brits in the north, having sided with criminal barbarians, are still under the misguided apprehension that they remain civilised - and superior with it; and they look down on and insult the refugees whose homes they trespass on.

What better term for the very dregs of British society than 'scum'?
Last edited by Malapapa on Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Malapapa » Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:41 pm

vaughanwilliams wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
vaughanwilliams wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
rigsby wrote:I don,t think the carpet baggers want a solution to the Cyprus Problem as I think it will make their situation worse, they think if there is a solution the G/C,s will be coming after their properties sooner rather than later,hence the vitriolic language against the G/C,s on 44 when really they have done nothing to provoke it other than wanting their land back


The vitriolic language on 44 against the innocent victims of war is down to the simple fact they are, demonstrably, scum, making Turkey's gangster regime in the north a den of thieves.


I would be interested in a few examples of the "vitriolic language" you have seen used on 44 against GCs. There is plenty of scorn, bravado and mickey-taking there but the "vitriol" (scum, :wink: ) is much more prevalent on this site, to my way of thinking.


This question needs to be addressed to rigsby as I don't make a habit of frequenting such seedy places. As for scum? Come on vaughan. What do you call someone who turns a blind eye so they can try and profit from other people's misery?


I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about who used vitriolic language, not why they used it.


Using vitrioic language to describe a greedy, gullible fool illegally trespassing in your home, and who then also insults you because you want it back, is, to my mind, fully justified.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby vaughanwilliams » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:07 pm

Malapapa wrote:
vaughanwilliams wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
vaughanwilliams wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
rigsby wrote:I don,t think the carpet baggers want a solution to the Cyprus Problem as I think it will make their situation worse, they think if there is a solution the G/C,s will be coming after their properties sooner rather than later,hence the vitriolic language against the G/C,s on 44 when really they have done nothing to provoke it other than wanting their land back


The vitriolic language on 44 against the innocent victims of war is down to the simple fact they are, demonstrably, scum, making Turkey's gangster regime in the north a den of thieves.


I would be interested in a few examples of the "vitriolic language" you have seen used on 44 against GCs. There is plenty of scorn, bravado and mickey-taking there but the "vitriol" (scum, :wink: ) is much more prevalent on this site, to my way of thinking.


This question needs to be addressed to rigsby as I don't make a habit of frequenting such seedy places. As for scum? Come on vaughan. What do you call someone who turns a blind eye so they can try and profit from other people's misery?


I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about who used vitriolic language, not why they used it.


Using vitrioic language to describe a greedy, gullible fool illegally trespassing in your home, and who then also insults you because you want it back, is, to my mind, fully justified.


I'm sure you might very well be right, but we aren't talking about WHY vitriolic language is being used. We are talking about WHO uses it, and it is clear that the use of it here on CF is far more the case than on 44.
We are constantly told of the "hate" that is "spewed" by Brits on 44 when it is clear to anyone who visits these sites where the spewing is being done. The constant repetition of this vitriol is a sure indicator to anyone that there is a deep and bitter hatred within the bosom of some GCs, a truth which the TCs would be well advised to be aware of. :shock:
User avatar
vaughanwilliams
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:54 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:09 pm

Vaughan dont worry we are well aware of their hate its all over this forum thats why safeguards and guarantees are an essential part of a solution.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby vaughanwilliams » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:16 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Vaughan dont worry we are well aware of their hate its all over this forum thats why safeguards and guarantees are an essential part of a solution.


You got that right, komshu. :D
User avatar
vaughanwilliams
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 12:54 pm

Postby Malapapa » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:30 pm

vaughanwilliams wrote:
Malapapa wrote:Using vitrioic language to describe a greedy, gullible fool illegally trespassing in your home, and who then also insults you because you want it back, is, to my mind, fully justified.


I'm sure you might very well be right, but we aren't talking about WHY vitriolic language is being used. We are talking about WHO uses it, and it is clear that the use of it here on CF is far more the case than on 44.
We are constantly told of the "hate" that is "spewed" by Brits on 44 when it is clear to anyone who visits these sites where the spewing is being done.


I can't comment because I don't frequent such virtual hovels.

vaughanwilliams wrote:The constant repetition of this vitriol is a sure indicator to anyone that there is a deep and bitter hatred within the bosom of some GCs,


Contempt is a more accurate word. Utter contempt.

vaughanwilliams wrote:a truth which the TCs would be well advised to be aware of. :shock:


Being too nice to foreign occupiers (esp. soliders, who I know you have a particular penchant for), certainly isn't advisable.

Image
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Malapapa » Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Vaughan dont worry we are well aware of their hate its all over this forum thats why safeguards and guarantees are an essential part of a solution.


Collaborators will be given a fair trial, in accordance with the Geneva convention.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests