rigsby wrote:Me thinks you are a little biased
Me thinks you don't know what you are talking about.
vaughanwilliams wrote:rigsby wrote:Yes you are right Malapapa what I don,t understand is why it,s not directed at the thieving scum who sold them the property/land in the first place
I rest my case.
rigsby wrote:Yes you are right Malapapa what I don,t understand is why it,s not directed at the thieving scum who sold them the property/land in the first place
vaughanwilliams wrote:Malapapa wrote:vaughanwilliams wrote:Malapapa wrote:rigsby wrote:I don,t think the carpet baggers want a solution to the Cyprus Problem as I think it will make their situation worse, they think if there is a solution the G/C,s will be coming after their properties sooner rather than later,hence the vitriolic language against the G/C,s on 44 when really they have done nothing to provoke it other than wanting their land back
The vitriolic language on 44 against the innocent victims of war is down to the simple fact they are, demonstrably, scum, making Turkey's gangster regime in the north a den of thieves.
I would be interested in a few examples of the "vitriolic language" you have seen used on 44 against GCs. There is plenty of scorn, bravado and mickey-taking there but the "vitriol" (scum, ) is much more prevalent on this site, to my way of thinking.
This question needs to be addressed to rigsby as I don't make a habit of frequenting such seedy places. As for scum? Come on vaughan. What do you call someone who turns a blind eye so they can try and profit from other people's misery?
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about who used vitriolic language, not why they used it.
Malapapa wrote:vaughanwilliams wrote:Malapapa wrote:vaughanwilliams wrote:Malapapa wrote:rigsby wrote:I don,t think the carpet baggers want a solution to the Cyprus Problem as I think it will make their situation worse, they think if there is a solution the G/C,s will be coming after their properties sooner rather than later,hence the vitriolic language against the G/C,s on 44 when really they have done nothing to provoke it other than wanting their land back
The vitriolic language on 44 against the innocent victims of war is down to the simple fact they are, demonstrably, scum, making Turkey's gangster regime in the north a den of thieves.
I would be interested in a few examples of the "vitriolic language" you have seen used on 44 against GCs. There is plenty of scorn, bravado and mickey-taking there but the "vitriol" (scum, ) is much more prevalent on this site, to my way of thinking.
This question needs to be addressed to rigsby as I don't make a habit of frequenting such seedy places. As for scum? Come on vaughan. What do you call someone who turns a blind eye so they can try and profit from other people's misery?
I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about who used vitriolic language, not why they used it.
Using vitrioic language to describe a greedy, gullible fool illegally trespassing in your home, and who then also insults you because you want it back, is, to my mind, fully justified.
Viewpoint wrote:Vaughan dont worry we are well aware of their hate its all over this forum thats why safeguards and guarantees are an essential part of a solution.
vaughanwilliams wrote:Malapapa wrote:Using vitrioic language to describe a greedy, gullible fool illegally trespassing in your home, and who then also insults you because you want it back, is, to my mind, fully justified.
I'm sure you might very well be right, but we aren't talking about WHY vitriolic language is being used. We are talking about WHO uses it, and it is clear that the use of it here on CF is far more the case than on 44.
We are constantly told of the "hate" that is "spewed" by Brits on 44 when it is clear to anyone who visits these sites where the spewing is being done.
vaughanwilliams wrote:The constant repetition of this vitriol is a sure indicator to anyone that there is a deep and bitter hatred within the bosom of some GCs,
vaughanwilliams wrote:a truth which the TCs would be well advised to be aware of.
Viewpoint wrote:Vaughan dont worry we are well aware of their hate its all over this forum thats why safeguards and guarantees are an essential part of a solution.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests