Cyprus-Forum.com

[paliometoxo]

for the strategic positioning of cyprus thats why they need or want bases in cyprus all this time

[georgios100]

... . The TCs, being a minority, may need the protection...

The fact that the bases are still here leads me to believe that this is the reason why.

So, you are asserting that the whole reason why we have TWO Sovereign Bases in the free area is to protect TCs ? ... and that was the preemptive reason for including them in the Constitution?

Therefore, you are accusing the UK of expecting the "abuse" of a minority, before the ink had even dried on the paper!

Oracle relax,

You are coming to conclusions that did not even cross my mind!

There are another 100 reasons why these British bases are still here. "Protecting a minority" might be one of them. As the British were pulling off from other colonies in the past, almost always, civil wars broke out as to who would gain power (India, Mid-east etc). Having said that, I might come to the conclusion that, yes, the Brits were expecting hostilities between the 2 sides.

Civil wars is nothing new. History is there as a witness.

I don't really care why the Brits are still here or why the Brits think they should be here... I want them out.

Please advise me of your position. Do you want the Brits out or not?

Warm regards,

Georgios100

[Oracle]

... . The TCs, being a minority, may need the protection...

The fact that the bases are still here leads me to believe that this is the reason why.

So, you are asserting that the whole reason why we have TWO Sovereign Bases in the free area is to protect TCs ? ... and that was the preemptive reason for including them in the Constitution?

Therefore, you are accusing the UK of expecting the "abuse" of a minority, before the ink had even dried on the paper!

You are coming to conclusions that did not even cross my mind!

Then tell us what did cross your mind as you stated:

Another form of security for the TCs?

Where did that come from?

There are another 100 reasons why these British bases are still here. "Protecting a minority" might be one of them.

And this is the one which you wish to ascribe to them judging by the number of times you have presented it, with subtle variations.

As the British were pulling off from other colonies in the past, almost always, civil wars broke out as to who would gain power (India, Mid-east etc). Having said that, I might come to the conclusion that, yes, the Brits were expecting hostilities between the 2 sides.

Don't be afraid; we all know you are Turkish anyway. Come out with your agenda!

[georgios100]

... . The TCs, being a minority, may need the protection...

The fact that the bases are still here leads me to believe that this is the reason why.

So, you are asserting that the whole reason why we have TWO Sovereign Bases in the free area is to protect TCs ? ... and that was the preemptive reason for including them in the Constitution?

Therefore, you are accusing the UK of expecting the "abuse" of a minority, before the ink had even dried on the paper!

You are coming to conclusions that did not even cross my mind!

Then tell us what did cross your mind as you stated:

Another form of security for the TCs?

Where did that come from?

There are another 100 reasons why these British bases are still here. "Protecting a minority" might be one of them.

And this is the one which you wish to ascribe to them judging by the number of times you have presented it, with subtle variations.

As the British were pulling off from other colonies in the past, almost always, civil wars broke out as to who would gain power (India, Mid-east etc). Having said that, I might come to the conclusion that, yes, the Brits were expecting hostilities between the 2 sides.

Don't be afraid; we all know you are Turkish anyway. Come out with your agenda!

I am a Greek Cypriot and proud to be so. When I was fighting the war in 1974 you was never born yet. I will not accept this kind of language from you. When you learn how to have a conversation, I will be ready to talk to you. You argue with everybody on this board. I bet you argue with your self all the time because no one wants to be with you. Your suspicions are beyond comprehension. You need help.

Don't bother to comment on my threads again, I won't read them.

Georgios100

[Oracle]

... . The TCs, being a minority, may need the protection...

The fact that the bases are still here leads me to believe that this is the reason why.

So, you are asserting that the whole reason why we have TWO Sovereign Bases in the free area is to protect TCs ? ... and that was the preemptive reason for including them in the Constitution?

Therefore, you are accusing the UK of expecting the "abuse" of a minority, before the ink had even dried on the paper!

You are coming to conclusions that did not even cross my mind!

Then tell us what did cross your mind as you stated:

Another form of security for the TCs?

Where did that come from?

There are another 100 reasons why these British bases are still here. "Protecting a minority" might be one of them.

And this is the one which you wish to ascribe to them judging by the number of times you have presented it, with subtle variations.

As the British were pulling off from other colonies in the past, almost always, civil wars broke out as to who would gain power (India, Mid-east etc). Having said that, I might come to the conclusion that, yes, the Brits were expecting hostilities between the 2 sides.

Don't be afraid; we all know you are Turkish anyway. Come out with your agenda!

I am a Greek Cypriot and proud to be so. When I was fighting the war in 1974 you was never born yet. I will not accept this kind of language from you. When you learn how to have a conversation, I will be ready to talk to you. You argue with everybody on this board. I bet you argue with your self all the time because no one wants to be with you. Your suspicions are beyond comprehension. You need help.

Don't bother to comment on my threads again, I won't read them.

Georgios100

It doesn't matter what you claim. It is your ideas which are being criticised and you are not being honest with answers! That is obvious.

Answer the questions I have asked you and stop trying to be a drama queen to avoid unforeseen bold comments.

[Gasman]

Dagnammit georgious - and she'd managed all that with only one little bit of bolding and now you've called a halt. I was actually reading it!

I agree with your conclusions about Oracle.

As for this:

Don't be afraid; we all know you are Turkish anyway. Come out with your agenda!

Cheeky cow! 'We all'?

Who the hell is included in 'we all'?

[B25]

Another form of security for the TCs?

This has got be to the most stupidest comment you have ever made here george.

FFS, what possessed you to even think such ridiculous ideas. yeah, thats right, play right into the hands of the TCs.

For a guy who claims to have fought in the war in 74, you sure as hell know sweet FA about the cyprus problem.

If you can't put 2 and 2 together and 4 and you need oracles take on it, you are a lost cause.

All your threads sound like they are coming from a 15 year old who has just discovered Cyprus. jesus man, ti malakies milas twra?

[Get Real!]

Well, during the 1974 invasion, I believe a British commander negotiated a truce and some peace keeping was implemented by the Brits. England, as a guarantor, assumed the responsibility of "protecting" both communities from attacking each other. The TCs, being a minority, may need the protection...

The fact that the bases are still here leads me to believe that this is the reason why.

George, it’s obvious you should be doing far less posting and much more reading!

Why don’t you just sit back and learn things over time since you’re interested, instead of wasting people’s time in here with imagined/assumed nonsense like the above?