Cyprus-Forum.com

[DTA]

I guess that’s the end of that mysterious horror story… could the rest please refrain from posting any further so we can get on with facts? Thanks!


http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle28.htm

"mysterious"
I'll be more then happy to guide you to that "mystrious" place myself.
the question is;ARE YOU UP FOR IT

The real questions you couldn't answer...

You mean,"you" dont want to beleive,because it doesnt suit you?
My offer still stands to guide you or anyone else for that matter.Dont worry,it is no more then 10 miles from the board.
Go on,prove to me that you have a heart of an ANGEL as an OUTLAW.

Yorgozlu ... your task is very simple, if you really wish to be compliant.

Whilst we respect the memory of all those who died, their names are not essential. Too many thousands on the GC side and too many hundreds on the TC side for us to be concerned with anything more than "too many Cypriots died in Cyprus' history".

Where you do a great injustice to the memory of all those who died, is to exaggerate the facts.

Not only did you claim 11 lost members from your family, acceptable even at that since Cypriots have large families and my second cousin thrice removed on my godparents' side is still part of my extended family and so I too could number losses in the hundreds by those criteria ... nope, the essence of our inquisitiveness lay in the second half of your statement which you have very craftily chosen to ignore by embellishing the fact you respect the "memory of the names" of you relatives.

So, forget the names. Even forget the number 11 (out of the 10 referred to as killed in the article Deniz supplied) ... and think back to your accusation that these 11 were BURIED ALIVE.

The question posed to you by B25, then me, then GR was how do you know they were buried alive?

If you wish to respect the memory of all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know (forensics?) these people were BURIED ALIVE ... not gruesome details, just clinical reports.

If you made a mistake, please say so and move on .....

Hiya how you doing today? now you say this: "I too could number losses in the hundreds" So tell us and then prove this, just as you are asking him to do otherwise stop being a hypocrite.

unless of course you dont " wish to respect the memory of [b]all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know"[/b]

Read what I said!

I did and quoted you on it... so either confirm to your own standards or cease your heartless quest... You are proving yourself a true hypocrite.

Then you clearly missed the absurd parallel ("by those criteria") I was drawing to help Yorgozlu get out of his claim of losing 11 members of his family when Deniz said only 10 died.

Hey I asked you how you were? you did not answer that is not polite to your fellow cypriot is it?

I will confirm to your criteria so tell us what your hundreds (as in more than a hundred) losses are or cease your heartless questioning unless you admit to being a hypocrite and therefore an enemy to cyprus? the chose is yours. BTW if you reply anything apart from your hundred of losses (which you will have to prove) I suggest to both TCs and GCs you are full of poo (see I was polite there)

[Oracle]

I guess that’s the end of that mysterious horror story… could the rest please refrain from posting any further so we can get on with facts? Thanks!


http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle28.htm

"mysterious"
I'll be more then happy to guide you to that "mystrious" place myself.
the question is;ARE YOU UP FOR IT

The real questions you couldn't answer...

You mean,"you" dont want to beleive,because it doesnt suit you?
My offer still stands to guide you or anyone else for that matter.Dont worry,it is no more then 10 miles from the board.
Go on,prove to me that you have a heart of an ANGEL as an OUTLAW.

Yorgozlu ... your task is very simple, if you really wish to be compliant.

Whilst we respect the memory of all those who died, their names are not essential. Too many thousands on the GC side and too many hundreds on the TC side for us to be concerned with anything more than "too many Cypriots died in Cyprus' history".

Where you do a great injustice to the memory of all those who died, is to exaggerate the facts.

Not only did you claim 11 lost members from your family, acceptable even at that since Cypriots have large families and my second cousin thrice removed on my godparents' side is still part of my extended family and so I too could number losses in the hundreds by those criteria ... nope, the essence of our inquisitiveness lay in the second half of your statement which you have very craftily chosen to ignore by embellishing the fact you respect the "memory of the names" of you relatives.

So, forget the names. Even forget the number 11 (out of the 10 referred to as killed in the article Deniz supplied) ... and think back to your accusation that these 11 were BURIED ALIVE.

The question posed to you by B25, then me, then GR was how do you know they were buried alive?

If you wish to respect the memory of all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know (forensics?) these people were BURIED ALIVE ... not gruesome details, just clinical reports.

If you made a mistake, please say so and move on .....

Hiya how you doing today? now you say this: "I too could number losses in the hundreds" So tell us and then prove this, just as you are asking him to do otherwise stop being a hypocrite.

unless of course you dont " wish to respect the memory of [b]all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know"[/b]

Read what I said!

I did and quoted you on it... so either confirm to your own standards or cease your heartless quest... You are proving yourself a true hypocrite.

Then you clearly missed the absurd parallel ("by those criteria") I was drawing to help Yorgozlu get out of his claim of losing 11 members of his family when Deniz said only 10 died.

Hey I asked you how you were? you did not answer that is not polite to your fellow cypriot is it?

I will confirm to your criteria so tell us what your hundreds (as in more than a hundred) losses are or cease your heartless questioning unless you admit to being a hypocrite and therefore an enemy to cyprus? the chose is yours. BTW if you reply anything apart from your hundred of losses (which you will have to prove) I suggest to both TCs and GCs you are full of poo (see I was polite there)

Being able to type is not the only way to debate here.

Do you really not understand "example by analogy" ?

I'll simplify what I said above.

IF I used Yorgozlu's criteria, I too could claim hundreds of losses .... BUT ... I DO NOT USE Yorgozlu's criteria!

Now do you understand!

Now, move along and make way for him to tell us how he knew they had ALL been buried alive ....

[DTA]

I guess that’s the end of that mysterious horror story… could the rest please refrain from posting any further so we can get on with facts? Thanks!


http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle28.htm

"mysterious"
I'll be more then happy to guide you to that "mystrious" place myself.
the question is;ARE YOU UP FOR IT

The real questions you couldn't answer...

You mean,"you" dont want to beleive,because it doesnt suit you?
My offer still stands to guide you or anyone else for that matter.Dont worry,it is no more then 10 miles from the board.
Go on,prove to me that you have a heart of an ANGEL as an OUTLAW.

Yorgozlu ... your task is very simple, if you really wish to be compliant.

Whilst we respect the memory of all those who died, their names are not essential. Too many thousands on the GC side and too many hundreds on the TC side for us to be concerned with anything more than "too many Cypriots died in Cyprus' history".

Where you do a great injustice to the memory of all those who died, is to exaggerate the facts.

Not only did you claim 11 lost members from your family, acceptable even at that since Cypriots have large families and my second cousin thrice removed on my godparents' side is still part of my extended family and so I too could number losses in the hundreds by those criteria ... nope, the essence of our inquisitiveness lay in the second half of your statement which you have very craftily chosen to ignore by embellishing the fact you respect the "memory of the names" of you relatives.

So, forget the names. Even forget the number 11 (out of the 10 referred to as killed in the article Deniz supplied) ... and think back to your accusation that these 11 were BURIED ALIVE.

The question posed to you by B25, then me, then GR was how do you know they were buried alive?

If you wish to respect the memory of all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know (forensics?) these people were BURIED ALIVE ... not gruesome details, just clinical reports.

If you made a mistake, please say so and move on .....

Hiya how you doing today? now you say this: "I too could number losses in the hundreds" So tell us and then prove this, just as you are asking him to do otherwise stop being a hypocrite.

unless of course you dont " wish to respect the memory of [b]all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know"[/b]

Read what I said!

I did and quoted you on it... so either confirm to your own standards or cease your heartless quest... You are proving yourself a true hypocrite.

Then you clearly missed the absurd parallel ("by those criteria") I was drawing to help Yorgozlu get out of his claim of losing 11 members of his family when Deniz said only 10 died.

Hey I asked you how you were? you did not answer that is not polite to your fellow cypriot is it?

I will confirm to your criteria so tell us what your hundreds (as in more than a hundred) losses are or cease your heartless questioning unless you admit to being a hypocrite and therefore an enemy to cyprus? the chose is yours. BTW if you reply anything apart from your hundred of losses (which you will have to prove) I suggest to both TCs and GCs you are full of poo (see I was polite there)

Being able to type is not the only way to debate here.

Do you really not understand "example by analogy" ?

I'll simplify what I said above.

IF I used Yorgozlu's criteria, I too could claim hundreds of losses .... BUT ... I DO NOT USE Yorgolzlu's criteria!

Now do you understand!

I understand that I am showing you up to be a hypocrite, answer the question or cease.

You enemy of Cyprus you !!! by the way you did not say how you were even though I asked you nicely more than once.

[Oracle]

I guess that’s the end of that mysterious horror story… could the rest please refrain from posting any further so we can get on with facts? Thanks!


http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle28.htm

"mysterious"
I'll be more then happy to guide you to that "mystrious" place myself.
the question is;ARE YOU UP FOR IT

The real questions you couldn't answer...

You mean,"you" dont want to beleive,because it doesnt suit you?
My offer still stands to guide you or anyone else for that matter.Dont worry,it is no more then 10 miles from the board.
Go on,prove to me that you have a heart of an ANGEL as an OUTLAW.

Yorgozlu ... your task is very simple, if you really wish to be compliant.

Whilst we respect the memory of all those who died, their names are not essential. Too many thousands on the GC side and too many hundreds on the TC side for us to be concerned with anything more than "too many Cypriots died in Cyprus' history".

Where you do a great injustice to the memory of all those who died, is to exaggerate the facts.

Not only did you claim 11 lost members from your family, acceptable even at that since Cypriots have large families and my second cousin thrice removed on my godparents' side is still part of my extended family and so I too could number losses in the hundreds by those criteria ... nope, the essence of our inquisitiveness lay in the second half of your statement which you have very craftily chosen to ignore by embellishing the fact you respect the "memory of the names" of you relatives.

So, forget the names. Even forget the number 11 (out of the 10 referred to as killed in the article Deniz supplied) ... and think back to your accusation that these 11 were BURIED ALIVE.

The question posed to you by B25, then me, then GR was how do you know they were buried alive?

If you wish to respect the memory of all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know (forensics?) these people were BURIED ALIVE ... not gruesome details, just clinical reports.

If you made a mistake, please say so and move on .....

Hiya how you doing today? now you say this: "I too could number losses in the hundreds" So tell us and then prove this, just as you are asking him to do otherwise stop being a hypocrite.

unless of course you dont " wish to respect the memory of [b]all the dead, and not take part in the exaggerations which have harmed our country, then please give us some idea of how you know"[/b]

Read what I said!

I did and quoted you on it... so either confirm to your own standards or cease your heartless quest... You are proving yourself a true hypocrite.

Then you clearly missed the absurd parallel ("by those criteria") I was drawing to help Yorgozlu get out of his claim of losing 11 members of his family when Deniz said only 10 died.

Hey I asked you how you were? you did not answer that is not polite to your fellow cypriot is it?

I will confirm to your criteria so tell us what your hundreds (as in more than a hundred) losses are or cease your heartless questioning unless you admit to being a hypocrite and therefore an enemy to cyprus? the chose is yours. BTW if you reply anything apart from your hundred of losses (which you will have to prove) I suggest to both TCs and GCs you are full of poo (see I was polite there)

Being able to type is not the only way to debate here.

Do you really not understand "example by analogy" ?

I'll simplify what I said above.

IF I used Yorgozlu's criteria, I too could claim hundreds of losses .... BUT ... I DO NOT USE Yorgolzlu's criteria!

Now do you understand!

I understand that I am showing you up to be a hypocrite, answer the question or cease.

You enemy of Cyprus you !!! by the way you did not say how you were even though I asked you nicely more than once.

I am only hypocrite in that I keep engaging with you when you clearly do not belong on a debating forum.

If I wanted to tell you exactly how many losses I had, and exactly when and exactly the means perpetrated ... all criteria which Yorgozlu provided by the way, out of the blue, and without encouragement, then I would have done so, voluntarily. But if you think I had absolutely no losses and by you hounding me so that I would get fed up and say I had absolutely no losses then you are mistaken. But any losses have never been quantified or categorized on this forum, so there is really nothing for me to clarify for you.

Now, Yorgozlu said 11 relatives, in Ayvasil and all buried alive .... We are not doubting his word, we would just like to know how he knows they were buried alive since Deniz said (quoted) they were all killed by shooting.

[Gasman]

My eyes! My eyes!

Overall readability is difficult with too many different fonts. Overuse of bold makes a document look inconsistent and may lead the reader to question the validity of the point the writer is making.

Try to limit the use of bold, italics and don't overuse font size. No one likes extremely large font that makes you want to dig your eyes out with a dull spoon, you should be able to catch the attention of your viewers without increasing the font size and using startling bright font colours if you have something worthwhile to say.

[Oracle]

My eyes! My eyes!

Overall readability is difficult with too many different fonts. Overuse of bold makes a document look inconsistent and may lead the reader to question the validity of the point the writer is making.

Try to limit the use of bold, italics and don't overuse font size. No one likes extremely large font that makes you want to dig your eyes out with a dull spoon, you should be able to catch the attention of your viewers without increasing the font size and using startling bright font colours if you have something worthwhile to say.

Stop whingeing!

If the fonts are available, get used to them, or get shades. Some forumers seem unable to read correctly when there are more than two words per sentence!

[Gasman]

Touched a nerve did I?

Must be very awkward not to be able to just type as you think of what you want to say - having to fiddle about with the bits of html etc. and then not always getting it right!

Do you do it in Notepad or Word and then check to see if it is outrageous looking and attention grabbing enough before you post it?

How would you cope on a forum that doesn't have the facility for you to irritate other people's eyeballs?

What you say is completely lost on me. I just see your posts and am reminded of the very worst eBay sellers and the way they list their fake handbags and other tat using the same style you do, hoping it will detract attention from the shoddiness of what they are offering.

And I never whinge. And, unlike you, I never rant or foam at the mouth or get over exercised other posters.

*got any more than 3 votes yet? Or was that just a ploy to stop any more voting you as annoying? The promise to leave if they didn't?

[Oracle]

No fancy fiddling necessary, dinosaur!

They are all at the top of the CF "post a reply" panel. Easy peasy!

[Gasman]

Definitely touched a nerve! It looks ridiculous.

[Gasman]

Oh, and I do know where they are - it's my job to know about html and about what looks effective and what doesn't! But I wouldn't dream of stopping typing to keep changing font size and colour for no good reason. I do wonder what your reasons for it are?

*Using color for emphasis is a rather tricky business. Like underlined words, colored words could be mistaken for a link within body text. Furthermore, there are the accessibility issues assocaited with using color to display important meaning on the Web, which further add to the conclusion that using color for emphasis is not ideal.