CopperLine wrote:As I have been saying all along, what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Really Copper, really? What is sauce for the goose, is sauce for the gander? really? Well, let me explain to you what kind of sauce it is then! I, a refugee with huge property in the north, knowing that the value of GC properties being usurped in the occupied north is 6-7 times more than the corresponding one belonging to TCs in the south, have absolutely no problem and no concern if all TC properties in the south are being taken back by their owners! Do you know why? Because: (a) TC properties in the south, besides being considerably less than the GC ones in the north and thus only sufficient for a small proportion of us (GC refugees,) cannot also be used and exploited in any meaningfully productive way, since those few of us that use them, are also considerably limited as to the kind of use we can possibly make out of them, and (b) the more the TC properties in the south are restituted to their TC owners, the better the chances we have to also attain restitution for all of our occupied properties in the north, since the TC leadership's claim that within the concept of bi-zonality there should also be an exchange of properties, gets thrown out of the window by default if there will be no TC properties in the south to be exchanged with GC ones in the north.
If you think that GCs are in any particular difficulty restituting TC properties in the south, to their owners, you are terribly mistaken! We rather allow all TC properties to be taken, because this strengthness our case regarding our properties in the north, and we will certainly not sacrifice an estimated 60-70 billions of euros worth of GC properties in the north, for the sake of holding onto only 10 billions worth of TC properties in the south. Come and take them to the last one, if you so wish, provided you have not exploited, usurped and sold any GC properties in the north, in which case you may also pass through the courts first.