The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Baggy Pants still favours Ankara's Apartheid in Cyprus ...

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:24 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Oracle wrote:Shut up, slow-on-the-uptake, Paphitis. :roll:

Turkey has since created a racist apartheid regime in the occupied north that forbids anyone of Greek name or origin to enter or return.

http://www.lobbyforcyprus.org/statement ... rus_34.htm



Image



Image


We call this ETHNIC CLEANSING Oracle! :roll:


Who is "we" Paphitis?

Ethnic cleansing is ONE atrocity. Apartheid is still ONE more atrocity.

Now shut up and stop forgiving the Turks for what the Lobby for Cyprus has recognized as the continuing atrocity on top of the ethnic cleansing!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Paphitis » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:33 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Oracle wrote:Shut up, slow-on-the-uptake, Paphitis. :roll:

Turkey has since created a racist apartheid regime in the occupied north that forbids anyone of Greek name or origin to enter or return.

http://www.lobbyforcyprus.org/statement ... rus_34.htm



Image



Image


We call this ETHNIC CLEANSING Oracle! :roll:

The systematic elimination of an ethnic group or groups from a region or society, as by deportation, forced emigration, or genocide.

The mass expulsion and killing of one ethnic or religious group in an area by another ethnic or religious group in that area.

Of course they are not going to allow those ethnically cleansed back, because that would defeat the purpose of ETHNIC CLEANSING! :roll:


We are those with half a brain and understand the differance between ETHNIC CLEANSING and Apartheid! Oh, and the UN of course. :roll:

BTW, I amended my last post....

We call this ETHNIC CLEANSING Oracle! :roll:

The systematic elimination of an ethnic group or groups from a region or society, as by deportation, forced emigration, or genocide.

The mass expulsion and killing of one ethnic or religious group in an area by another ethnic or religious group in that area.

Of course they are not going to allow those ethnically cleansed (expelled) back, because that would defeat the purpose of ETHNIC CLEANSING! :roll:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:39 pm

Paphitis wrote:Of course they are not going to allow those ethnically cleansed (expelled) back, because that would defeat the purpose of ETHNIC CLEANSING! :roll:


Yes, you are getting there. And how is this ethnic cleansing maintained?

By Apartheid!

Is it so difficult to hold two thoughts in your head at the same time?

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/le ... 48678.html
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Paphitis » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:48 pm

Oracle wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Of course they are not going to allow those ethnically cleansed (expelled) back, because that would defeat the purpose of ETHNIC CLEANSING! :roll:


Yes, you are getting there. And how is this ethnic cleansing maintained?

By Apartheid!

Is it so difficult to hold two thoughts in your head at the same time?

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/le ... 48678.html


Why don't you check the definitions of ETHNIC CLEANSING and then realize that it supersedes and overrides Apartheid!

The systematic elimination of an ethnic group or groups from a region or society, as by deportation, forced emigration, or genocide.

The mass expulsion and killing of one ethnic or religious group in an area by another ethnic or religious group in that area.

Are you trying to say you are illiterate?

You Oracle, have a long way to go!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Core document forming part of the reports of states parties : Cyprus. 23/07/98.
HRI/CORE/1/Add.28/Rev.1. (Core Document)

9. The policies pursued by Turkey in the occupied area since its invasion of Cyprus constitutes the first case of ethnic cleansing in post-Second World War Europe.

http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/%28Sym ... endocument

As you can see, there is no mention of Apartheid anywhere because this would undermine the ETHNIC CLEANSING thesis by definition. :roll:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:30 pm

Unfortunately Paphitis exemplifies those who "read" a dictionary, but are unable to digest meaning, let alone comprehend the world around them.

Because he has got used to the term Ethnic Cleansing, he is unable to register any of the other crimes which Turkey can expertly carry out, at the same time.



“Turkey’s Aggression, War Crimes, Ethnic Cleansing and Apartheid Policy in Cyprus with Kissinger’s Complicity”

In July and August 1974-thirty three years ago-Turkey committed aggression, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and an apartheid policy in Cyprus with the full complicity of the then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.


On August 13, 1974, Turkey issued a thirty-six hour ultimatum to Greece and Britain to accept Turkey’s proposal, which was tantamount to partition, for six separate Turkish Cypriot “cantons” consisting of thirty-four percent of the island nation for the eighteen percent minority community.

European Convention on Human Rights
The government of Cyprus filed three applications to the European Commission on Human Rights. The Commission issued its report on the charges made in the first two applications on July 10, 1976. In it, the Commission found Turkey guilty of violating the following articles of the European Convention on Human Rights:

Article 2—by the killing of innocent civilians committed on a substantial scale;
Article 3—by the rape of women of all ages from 12 to 71;
Article 3—by inhuman treatment of prisoners and persons detained;
Article 5—by deprivation of liberty with regard to detainees and missing persons—a continuing violation;
Article 8—by displacement of persons creating more than 170,000 Greek Cypriot refugees, and by refusing to allow the refugees to return to their homes—a continuing violation;
Article 1—of the First Protocol to the Convention—by deprivation of possessions, looting and robbery on an extensive scale.
On January 23, 1977, the London Sunday Times published excerpts of the report and stated: “It amounts to a massive indictment of the Ankara government for murder, rape and looting by its army in Cyprus during and after the Turkish invasion of summer 1974.”

Turkey in the second phase of its invasion, three weeks after the legitimate government of Cyprus had been restored and without a pretext, committed war crimes, ethnic cleansing and applied an apartheid policy to Cyprus. The political and military leadership of Turkey at that time should have been tried as war criminals. However, since they were a U.S. ally and member of NATO, the U.S. applied a double standard to Turkey and did nothing. In effect, through Kissinger’s actions and deliberate inactions, the U.S. became an accomplice to Turkey’s war crimes, ethnic cleansing and apartheid policy which severely damaged U.S. interests.


http://www.ahiworld.com/press_releases/092807.html
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Paphitis » Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:07 am

Wow Oracle! You are becoming desperate! :shock:

I tell you what, you come up with one official source from the RoC or UN, just like I did, and then we can talk!

Your sources, the Lobby for Cyprus, and the American Hellenic Institute don't hold any water when compared to my official Republic of Cyprus core document forming part of the reports of State parties HRI/CORE/1/Add.28/Rev.1.

Core document forming part of the reports of states parties : Cyprus. 23/07/98.
HRI/CORE/1/Add.28/Rev.1. (Core Document)

9. The policies pursued by Turkey in the occupied area since its invasion of Cyprus constitutes the first case of ethnic cleansing in post-Second World War Europe.

http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/%28Sym ... endocument

Now, as I suspect, and as you well know, since you couldn't find anything more credible, there is NO official RoC, UN or Red Cross source that uses the term of Apartheid on occupied and ethnically cleansed land.

There can be no Apartheid on occupied and ethnically cleansed lands.

This leaves you "up shit creek without a paddle".

Now shut up, and I will consider throwing you a line!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:42 am

Please try and accept that Ankara's Apartheid is a way of maintaining the ethnic cleansing. As was the Annan Plan ....

http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/mfa2006.nsf/A ... enDocument
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Paphitis » Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:46 am

Oracle wrote:Please try and accept that Ankara's Apartheid is a way of maintaining the ethnic cleansing. As was the Annan Plan ....

http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/mfa2006.nsf/A ... enDocument


ADDRESS BY THE PRESIDENT OF PSEKA MR. PHILIP CHRISTOPHER AT THE 16TH WORLD CONFERENCE OF OVERSEAS CYPRIOTS 24-28 AUGUST 2009 - Date: 24/08/2009

Furthermore, no mention of the word Apartheid!

Mr. Philip Christopher also needs to check his facts before making a fool of himself. Fancy that! :shock:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:49 am

Among those calling for the program's suspension was Stuart E. Eizenstat, a former high-level Clinton administration official and President Carter's chief domestic advisor.

In a letter to Reed this week, he compared the Turkish-run regime to South Africa in the apartheid era.

"When confronted with a similar situation involving investments in apartheid South Africa, California and its universities properly declined to participate until resolution of the local political and human rights concerns," wrote Eizenstat, who is with the law firm Covington & Burling, which represents the Cyprus government. "I respectfully ask that you take a similarly principled stand today."


http://articles.latimes.com/2006/dec/07 ... me-cyprus7
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Oracle » Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:51 am

Paphitis wrote:
Oracle wrote:Please try and accept that Ankara's Apartheid is a way of maintaining the ethnic cleansing. As was the Annan Plan ....

http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/mfa2006.nsf/A ... enDocument


ADDRESS BY THE PRESIDENT OF PSEKA MR. PHILIP CHRISTOPHER AT THE 16TH WORLD CONFERENCE OF OVERSEAS CYPRIOTS 24-28 AUGUST 2009 - Date: 24/08/2009

Furthermore, no mention of the word Apartheid!

Mr. Philip Christopher also needs to check his facts before making a fool of himself. Fancy that! :shock:


THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS THAT REJECTED THE SEGRAGIONIST, APARTHEID STYLE SOLUTION EMBODIES IN THE 'ANAN' PLAN IS NOT THE REPUBLIC OF 1974 THAT WAS BRUTALLY VICTIMIZED AND ILLEGALLY INVADED BY A COUNTRY THAT ASPIRES TO BE A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest