Cyprus-Forum.com

[denizaksulu]

How come no one has responded to Georgios100 topic below?

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=28554

The following link was produced: In which, as Georgious pointed out was rather interesting information.

Among other things, what was mentioned was the AIMS of EOKA, which is stated as being Independence AND ENOSIS.

Is that why GR 'overlooked' this article or is the Sweedish author in fact a secret Turkish/TC sympathiser.


http://books.google.ca/books?id=ohBRhxR ... es&f=false


Please check-out page 105.

[denizaksulu]

Welcome to the Cyprus Forum Georgios100.

[Oracle]

He is a fake ....

[denizaksulu]

He is a fake ....

Who ? GR? He cant be!!!

[denizaksulu]

Do you have 'credible evidence'?

[Oracle]

He is a fake ....

Who ? GR? He cant be!!!

Everyone!

It's all an illusion!

[Get Real!]

How come no one has responded to Georgios100 topic below?

I don’t take newbies too seriously Deniz; I’d rather wait till they’ve established themselves a little before taking a serious look at what they post but since you’ve spotted something I’ll have a look.

[denizaksulu]

I'd say its a fair summation.

[Get Real!]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?