Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

[denizaksulu]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Thank you GR. You never fail to disappoint me This was the answer I expected.

Anyway, I save Georgios100 the trouble and point out page 105 for you.

Never mind GR, neither you nor me were after Enosis anyway, so why worry.

[Get Real!]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

[Get Real!]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

I did come across a figure for that but I can’t remember it today.

There is a very good (detailed) report called “Consequences of the Turkish invasion on Cyprus” or something like that conducted by the US Senate, which gave statistics for pretty much everything including Turkish casualties etc, but unfortunately it seems to have disappeared from the Internet.

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

I did come across a figure for that but I can’t remember it today.

There is a very good (detailed) report called “Consequences of the Turkish invasion on Cyprus” or something like that conducted by the US Senate, which gave statistics for pretty much everything including Turkish casualties etc, but unfortunately it seems to have disappeared from the Internet.

But the UN figure is 200 so based on the criteria on your own website would you agree with this?

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

Listen fucking tourkos.

Some of those girls were raped by up to 20 protozoan Turksoil dirt soldiers at a time. And for every one reported case, there were 10 who hid away from the madness.

Oracle, hi again, I have already said that I believe that the 200 rapes was not accurate and there were more (I have also said that 1 rape is too much). What I am doing is asking GR that if he believes in his own criteria in his own website, for accurate sources so please butt out unless you can stay on topic.

Ps change your handle you dont deserve to use it.

[Get Real!]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

I did come across a figure for that but I can’t remember it today.

There is a very good (detailed) report called “Consequences of the Turkish invasion on Cyprus” or something like that conducted by the US Senate, which gave statistics for pretty much everything including Turkish casualties etc, but unfortunately it seems to have disappeared from the Internet.

But the UN figure is 200 so based on the criteria on your own website would you agree with this?

Lete's have a look at it... (the link)

[DTA]

Deniz, by my standards this “Thomas Blom Hansen” is not credible evidence so I would never use any of his material against the TMT, and by the same token I wouldn’t think much of any of his EOKA allegations.

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle01.htm

George makes his thread even less appealing by failing to quote the sections he wants to highlight and that's the main reason why it's not going anywhere. Asking readers to just read many pages of text never leads to a meaningful discussion evidenced by the lack of responses.

Out of interest why do you not you not think he is credible (I say this without even reading his text) just interested to know what your criteria is?

This small article should explain why...

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle29.htm

Ok so its just basically the UN amongst a few others that you claim is a credible source of evidence - So the UN say there were 200 rapes in 1974 would this be a number that you would agree with? because As a TC I recognise that this number is most probably not the complete picture.

By the way I think that even one Rape is too much, so I am in no way trying to justify anything, just trying to see where you are going with this.

Let me put it this way… if organizations like the UN and the Red Cross which specialize and were ASSIGNED the job of conducting country-wide investigations of a wide variety, cannot extract the most accurate statistics then I don’t know who can…

So you would agree that 200 rapes was the correct number?

I did come across a figure for that but I can’t remember it today.

There is a very good (detailed) report called “Consequences of the Turkish invasion on Cyprus” or something like that conducted by the US Senate, which gave statistics for pretty much everything including Turkish casualties etc, but unfortunately it seems to have disappeared from the Internet.

But the UN figure is 200 so based on the criteria on your own website would you agree with this?

Lete's have a look at it... (the link)

Ok, IF I get you the link will you admit without reservations that this is the correct figure?