Re the advice on the Orams
It is suggested that there are 3 grounds that can be used to refuse to enforce the judgement of one EU court in another EU country.
The ground that appears to offer most protection if it is confirmed to be correct is "judgement in default" ie dont attend RoC court to defend any writ.
It is stated that the reason Orams could not use this route is because they appealled intial default ruling in the RoC
If this legal advice is indeed correct then the expat problem is solved
Simply do not respond to any writ or appeal any judgement issued by RoC and this type of judgement then falls outside the EU law of enforceability elsewhere in the EU.
This is how the legal opinion of Naomi Mehmet appears to be written and clarification/confirmation of this should be sought via a lawyer expert in EU law
