The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


E.O.K.A Greek Cypriot freedom fighers VS TMT

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Liontaroui » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:41 pm

Get Real! wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:EOKA's PRIME aim was independence from Britain.

They knew they were up against resistance from Turkey and so, later, gravitated towards Enosis for security from the second enemy to freedom, the TMT.

If the Turks were not buzzing around to invade Cyprus, none of this would EVER have been a problem.

Wrong wrong wrong. ENOSIS was the SYNTHEMA never ANEXARTISIA .
Lets face realities , I lived through the EOKA era and participated. The oath taken did not include the word Enosis as GR pointed out , but ENOSIS WAS THE FOCUS OF THE STRUGGLE .
PRECISELY WHY TODAY WE HAVE A DIVIDED ISLAND !

If you had “enosis” ideas Miltiades, you cannot condemn every other person who signed up and joined EOKA after reading the official oath which made no reference to enosis whatsoever!

In other words, YOU CAN SPEAK FOR YOURSELF but don't even think about putting words in other people's mouths!


Are you seriously saying that EOKA, the ELLINIKI organosi Kyprion Agoniston were'nt particularly interested in enosis? Ma happopinneis?
Liontaroui
Member
Member
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 7:10 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 pm

Liontaroui wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:EOKA's PRIME aim was independence from Britain.

They knew they were up against resistance from Turkey and so, later, gravitated towards Enosis for security from the second enemy to freedom, the TMT.

If the Turks were not buzzing around to invade Cyprus, none of this would EVER have been a problem.

Wrong wrong wrong. ENOSIS was the SYNTHEMA never ANEXARTISIA .
Lets face realities , I lived through the EOKA era and participated. The oath taken did not include the word Enosis as GR pointed out , but ENOSIS WAS THE FOCUS OF THE STRUGGLE .
PRECISELY WHY TODAY WE HAVE A DIVIDED ISLAND !

If you had “enosis” ideas Miltiades, you cannot condemn every other person who signed up and joined EOKA after reading the official oath which made no reference to enosis whatsoever!

In other words, YOU CAN SPEAK FOR YOURSELF but don't even think about putting words in other people's mouths!


Are you seriously saying that EOKA, the ELLINIKI organosi Kyprion Agoniston were'nt particularly interested in enosis? Ma happopinneis?


In your partitionist's dreams ... :roll:

EOKA .... Εθνική Οργάνωσις Κυπρίων Αγωνιστών

Ethniki Organosis Kyprion Agoniston or Ethnikí Orgánosis Kipriakoú Agónos

Greek for: National Organisation of Cypriot Fighters/Struggle
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby BirKibrisli » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:55 pm

Get Real! wrote:
aussieturk wrote:Utter rubbish. Why do you think there was mass migration by the TC's from Cyprus in the 50's, because the TC's were treated like dirt by the GC's. For gods sake, I thought the GC's were the majority of the population, running the majoruty of businesses and reluctant to employ TC's and creating unemployment and poverty, thats why they left.

You’re talking manufactured rubbish! From the Library of Congress…

Table 7. Turkish Cypriot Population

Year - Population

1921 - 61,339
1931 - 64,245
1946 - 80,548
1960 - 104,333


http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cyprus/cy_appen.html

The TC population was steadily increasing so it’s back to uneducated grandpa for some more horror stories to justify their crimes! :wink:


Where I sit now I look up and see my Uncle who is visiting us from Canberra...He immigrated to Australia in 1952...Yesterday I took him to visit an old friend of his,another TC who came out in 1952...Tomorrow we are going to visit Mum's and Uncle's cousin who immigrated in 1951....

These people obviously do not appear in your statistics,GR!...but who knows they might be figments of my imagination...I can't give you a credible link either,they are not on the internet...Perhaps they all left Cyprus to advance Turkey's territorial ambitions... :roll:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Malapapa » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:58 pm

erolz3 wrote:
Malapapa wrote:Well in the same way that the enosis aspiration is now dead, so too must the apartheid system represented by the 1960's constitution, which we must be mindful of in any new BBF so as to ensure there is no perpetuation of this racism.


The problem is that whilst enosis is dead, the underpinning belief behind it, namely that GC acting not as Cypriots but as Greeks have every right to impose anything they like on TC in Cyprus with no regard for TC wishes, either because there are more of them or because they are the 'real' cypriots is certainly not dead as far as I can see.


Perhaps then a 'real' Cypriot is one won't impose "anything they like" on minority communities; who treats them with respect, embracing them as equals.

The treatment of minority Cypriot communities in the north since 1974 (leaving aside the majority Greek Orthodox Christians with whom TCs have a particular gripe) has been appalling. In the free areas, while by no means perfect, their treatment has been far more civilised, and they enjoy prominent positions in government and other areas of life.

What is the undepinning belief for why Maronites, Armenians et al have been treated so horrendously in the north? Is it simply because these minorities are of a Christian background? And might this have something to do with why TCs wishes aren't held in particular high regard.


erolz3 wrote:That remains a very real and current issue for me and a concern for me as a TC as evidence by many of the GC posters here.

Whilst I hear what you say about avoiding racism in any future solution and have much sympathy for the ideal things are not quite so black and white to me. Positive discrimination is racist yet I believe in all sorts of situations it can and is an approriate means of addressing real issues.

Given the history of Cyprus I do not believe we can get to the ideal of a unitary state in Cyprus where it really does not matter if you are GC, TC or any other sort of Cypriot, from where we are today without some some sort of 'transition period' where the TC have a degree of political equality as a community. Whether you want to consider such a necessary form of 'positive discrimination' or an expression of TC rights as a people, as far as GC choose to define and behave as a people that excludes TC does not really matter to me.

For me that degree of political equality does not have to my community an equal say as communites on EVERY issue, but it does have to give equality to the communites on issues that are commual in their very nature. That is on issues where you 'vote' one way or another based on if you are GC or TC, or to put it another way on issues that affect you differently if you are a GC or a TC. That to me is the minimum requirement for political equality needed so we can move from where we are today to the goal of a unitary Cypriot state and people.

If we can not accept this necessity then I do not think a solution is possible , whether you label the opposition to accepting such as being 'anti racist' or not.


Perhaps positive discrimination, carefully administered, has some validity, for a clearly defined period (although I personally have my doubts as to whether this works in practice as it simply creates resentment and therefore, potentially, more discrimination).

However, TCs have shown their singular inability to respect other minorities and this is a real concern if they are to be positively discriminated against.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Get Real! » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:04 pm

BirKibrisli wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
aussieturk wrote:Utter rubbish. Why do you think there was mass migration by the TC's from Cyprus in the 50's, because the TC's were treated like dirt by the GC's. For gods sake, I thought the GC's were the majority of the population, running the majoruty of businesses and reluctant to employ TC's and creating unemployment and poverty, thats why they left.

You’re talking manufactured rubbish! From the Library of Congress…

Table 7. Turkish Cypriot Population

Year - Population

1921 - 61,339
1931 - 64,245
1946 - 80,548
1960 - 104,333


http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cyprus/cy_appen.html

The TC population was steadily increasing so it’s back to uneducated grandpa for some more horror stories to justify their crimes! :wink:


Where I sit now I look up and see my Uncle who is visiting us from Canberra...He immigrated to Australia in 1952...Yesterday I took him to visit an old friend of his,another TC who came out in 1952...Tomorrow we are going to visit Mum's and Uncle's cousin who immigrated in 1951....

These people obviously do not appear in your statistics,GR!...but who knows they might be figments of my imagination...I can't give you a credible link either,they are not on the internet...Perhaps they all left Cyprus to advance Turkey's territorial ambitions... :roll:

And your point being what exactly about your uncle? There are 500 thousand Greek Cypriots in the diaspora… a figure that DWARFS your 40 odd thousand TCs tenfold!

http://thecyprusproblem.100webspace.net ... icle30.htm
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:11 pm

Liontaroui wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:EOKA's PRIME aim was independence from Britain.

They knew they were up against resistance from Turkey and so, later, gravitated towards Enosis for security from the second enemy to freedom, the TMT.

If the Turks were not buzzing around to invade Cyprus, none of this would EVER have been a problem.

Wrong wrong wrong. ENOSIS was the SYNTHEMA never ANEXARTISIA .
Lets face realities , I lived through the EOKA era and participated. The oath taken did not include the word Enosis as GR pointed out , but ENOSIS WAS THE FOCUS OF THE STRUGGLE .
PRECISELY WHY TODAY WE HAVE A DIVIDED ISLAND !

If you had “enosis” ideas Miltiades, you cannot condemn every other person who signed up and joined EOKA after reading the official oath which made no reference to enosis whatsoever!

In other words, YOU CAN SPEAK FOR YOURSELF but don't even think about putting words in other people's mouths!


Are you seriously saying that EOKA, the ELLINIKI organosi Kyprion Agoniston were'nt particularly interested in enosis? Ma happopinneis?

It's actually Εθνική Οργάνωσις Κυπρίων Αγωνιστών !!! (National organization of Cypriot fighters)

Read the official declaration and tell us where you see anything about "enosis with Greece"!

Image

It seems that some of you were interpreting things in whichever way you wanted back then… :roll:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:20 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Liontaroui wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:EOKA's PRIME aim was independence from Britain.

They knew they were up against resistance from Turkey and so, later, gravitated towards Enosis for security from the second enemy to freedom, the TMT.

If the Turks were not buzzing around to invade Cyprus, none of this would EVER have been a problem.

Wrong wrong wrong. ENOSIS was the SYNTHEMA never ANEXARTISIA .
Lets face realities , I lived through the EOKA era and participated. The oath taken did not include the word Enosis as GR pointed out , but ENOSIS WAS THE FOCUS OF THE STRUGGLE .
PRECISELY WHY TODAY WE HAVE A DIVIDED ISLAND !

If you had “enosis” ideas Miltiades, you cannot condemn every other person who signed up and joined EOKA after reading the official oath which made no reference to enosis whatsoever!

In other words, YOU CAN SPEAK FOR YOURSELF but don't even think about putting words in other people's mouths!


Are you seriously saying that EOKA, the ELLINIKI organosi Kyprion Agoniston were'nt particularly interested in enosis? Ma happopinneis?

It's actually Εθνική Οργάνωσις Κυπρίων Αγωνιστών !!!

Read the official declaration and tell us where you see anything about "enosis with Greece"!

Image

It seems that some of you were interpreting things in whichever way you wanted back then… :roll:


Maybe you should do a thread to analyse the extent/lack of this desire for Enosis. Because nobody in my extended family wanted Enosis ... even my mum. Also, Greece never made any moves towards Enosis .. they only armed against the struggle for freedom.

How did the Enosis idea gain such momentum ... with everyone, but not GCs?

It's looking more and more like Turkish partitionist propaganda making a mountain out of a mole-hill ... and even transposing Ethniki for Elliniki! :roll:

Cyprus and Greece share common heritage and cultural ideals ... Both were and are comfortable enough with each other as equal partners in Hellenism.
Last edited by Oracle on Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Get Real! » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:23 pm

aussieturk wrote:yes Denied - check your history, Ottomans treated all its subjects with respect.

The empire didn't lose Cyprus. Cyprus was a gift to Britain for its assistance in the war against the Russians.

You’re trying VERY hard to take over the forum clown reigns from Y-Fronts and you’re close to getting my approval…

The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne

ARTICLE 20.
Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyprus proclaimed by the British Government on the sth November, 1914.

ARTICLE 2I .
Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the 5th November, 1914, will acquire British nationality subject to the conditions laid down in the local law, and will thereupon lose their Turkish nationality. They will, however, have the right to opt for Turkish nationality within two years from the coming into force of the present Treaty, provided that they leave Cyprus within twelve months after having so opted.

Turkish nationals ordinarily resident in Cyprus on the coming into force of the present Treaty who, at that date, have acquired or are in process of acquiring British nationality in consequence of a request made in accordance with the local law, will also thereupon lose their Turkish nationality.

It is understood that the Government of Cyprus will be entitled to refuse British nationality to inhabitants of the island who, being Turkish nationals, had formerly acquired another nationality without the consent of the Turkish Government.


http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Treaty_of_Lausanne

Not only did Turkey surrender all claims to Cyprus, but Turkish Cypriots abandoned (signed away) Turkishness or left for Turkey altogether!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:28 pm

Oracle wrote:Maybe you should do a thread to analyse the extent/lack of this desire for Enosis.

Yeah... maybe we should.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby miltiades » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:31 pm

Get Real! wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Oracle wrote:EOKA's PRIME aim was independence from Britain.

They knew they were up against resistance from Turkey and so, later, gravitated towards Enosis for security from the second enemy to freedom, the TMT.

If the Turks were not buzzing around to invade Cyprus, none of this would EVER have been a problem.

Wrong wrong wrong. ENOSIS was the SYNTHEMA never ANEXARTISIA .
Lets face realities , I lived through the EOKA era and participated. The oath taken did not include the word Enosis as GR pointed out , but ENOSIS WAS THE FOCUS OF THE STRUGGLE .
PRECISELY WHY TODAY WE HAVE A DIVIDED ISLAND !

If you had “enosis” ideas Miltiades, you cannot condemn every other person who signed up and joined EOKA after reading the official oath which made no reference to enosis whatsoever!

In other words, YOU CAN SPEAK FOR YOURSELF but don't even think about putting words in other people's mouths!

GR , I was there , I took part. ENOSIS WAS THE ONLY GOAL PURE AND SIMPLE.
May I also add that I saw nothing wrong in demanding ENOSIS , the G/Cs were the overwhelming majority and had the right to chart their own future.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest