Malapapa wrote:After 1960, the numerically even smaller and economically even weaker Maronite, Armenian and Latin communities weren't treated as even 3rd or 4th class citizens as constitutionally they ceased to exist.
Nor do I believe they were treated as 2nd class citizens before 1960 to the same degree as TC frequently were, for whilst not being Greek they did share a common religion and they were not pecieved as and tought through the Greek education system and Greek church as having been the 'enemies of hellenism' as the TC were and nor did they represent a block on the GC desire for enosis because of their numbers and because helenisation did not mean to them as Cypriots what it meant to TC as CYpriots. Even then and still today they have issue as a community within the RoC with regards to maintaing their culture and heritage, just not the same degree as those suffered by TC in general pre 74.
Malapapa wrote: Would you agree that such a racist, apartheid system of governance should never have been introduced on the Cypriot people, erolz?
Not really. I agree that the 60's agreements contained weaknesses and flaws and as a compromise they did not satisfy either party wholly. However I share the view of that expressed by Professor Dr. Ernst Forsthoff of Hiedlberg University who was appointed as president of the Supreme Consitutional Court in Cyprus and who resigned in the face of Makarios' refusal to recnogise the legal ruling of this court when he said
Every consitution can have its peculiar problems. There is no consitution in the world which has not got its particular difficulties and problems. This is primarily a question of goodwill. If there is goodwill a constituion can be implemented and this Constituion (RoC in 60's) is capable of being implemented.
I do accpet that the 60's consitution can be considered racist if one wish to do so but no more so than the idea of enosis is racist in the same sense.