Oracle wrote:erolz3 wrote:It is a notion that the ANC itself as far back as 1955 explicitly rejected BECAUSE it was a divisive notion of nationalism and instead comitted themselves to an inclusive one.
Is that what the White, foreign, Colonialists imposed on the ANC shortly before they then
banned them?
Once more you show how by your choosing to categorise the groups in SA under aparthied how YOUR notion of nationalism is exclusive and divisive and how different it was and is from that of the ANC , that rejected such divisive notions of SA nationalism.
The ANC could easily have chosen to portray the stuggle against aparthied as one of a struggle between 'real' SA , the 'natives' as you call them and 'white foriegn colonialist'. However they unlike you could see as far back as 1955 why doing such would damage all prospects of building a new inclusive and better SA after aparthied was defeated.
Defending and struggling for their rights , as SAs and as humans did not require them to define the whites in SA, both that were opressing them as well as those that opposed such opression, as not SA with no place in SA and as white foriegn colonialists. They defended their rights and eventualy ended the oppression of aparthied not only without doing this but explicitly rejecting such notions, and thus not only achieved an end to arparthied but created a potential for a true inclusive SA nation and nationalism after aparthied that could not have esixted if they had do as YOU do today.
In short there are reasons why the ANC explictly rejected the notion that the struggle against aparthied was one of 'native' SA vs foreign white colonial rulers. Just as there are reasons why YOU today define the struggle as such despite the ANC rejection of it 55 years ago.