Bananiot wrote:We need to be totally impartial and honest when trying to view critically the past regarding the atrocities committed by each community against the other. Otherwise the excercise has no meaning. I get very upset and angry when reading that the atrocities committed by the GC's were the responsibility of a bunch of fools, ie EOKA B' members. At the same time, shamelesly, some people declare that the atrocities committed against the GC's were the work of Turks! This is totally unacceptable and people that make such arguments can only be labelled as racists and anti Cypriot in general. Such statements do nothing to build bridges for the two communities. They merely fuel the partition flames which are now raging out of control, in front of our doorsteps.
I can only speak for my community and in so doing it does not mean that I excuse the atrocities committed by the TC side. Its sad that I even need to make this distinction but in this forum there are so many members ready to make wild accusations of the most uncharecteristic type. Anyway, I do not really care much, even when people point out that I represent Denktash or even Ecevit. This is because I strongly believe that the real interests of Cyprus call for clear and transparent arguments where people are free to speak their mind without the bigots calling "traitor". This has been our curse from the past and I will simply ignore their cries.
I do not know who said in this forum that the atrocities committed against the TCs were the work of only the EOKA B and the atrocities against the GCs were the work of Turks in general, as you implied.
While you accuse us -all GCs of this forum, for unfairly claiming that Turks in general committed atrocities, you also generalise by implying that all GCs in this forum do believe and say so. It is better to be specific the next time and also make a quotation of what has been said and by whom. Unless your only purpose was to appear, yet another time, nice to the TCs in this forum.
It is a true fact however that as far as the atrocities against TCs after the 23rd of July 1974, were exclusively the work of EOKA B criminals. Most of them are known by their names as well!
I do not see why by saying that EOKA B members committed these atrocities in 1974 -a true fact, doesn’t contribute to the building of bridges between the two communities and fuel the partition flames, as you alleged. Weren't the Eoka B criminals also members of the GC community? Your thesis sounds very absurd!
I can only see one purpose behind what you wrote above. You want the entire GC community and especially the younger generations, to feel guilty on a personal level for what some other members of their community have done in the past and in which the did not have any involvement, nor they can change anything of what had already happened. You want to victimise all the GCs in this way, so that they accept and absorb the blame and the guild and consequently reduce their appetite to insist on a solution that will better safeguard their genuine interests. In other words you are just saying, we invited the war, we invited Turkey, we invited partition, it is all our fault, therefore now we must accept to pay the whole price and should not have any demands for a fair solution. We should also accept all the consequences and accept any plan they bring in front of us. In a nutshell, you are just trying to morally victimise and ethically defeat the entire GC community, so that they accept the solution you have already accepted (A-plan,) and say thank you on top of it!
Bananiot wrote:Well, I am reluctantly back, spurred on by the responses in this thread. Moving on from what I mentioned in the first paragraph, I would like to put to you that while all atrocities committed are of course condemned (again, I hate myself for having to clarify this) I believe the GC side shoulders more of the blame. This is because there is no excuse for state organs, such as the police or the national guard, or even state sponsored "Organisations" to embark in the killing of innocent people. It is wrong to believe that killings were done only by EOKA B' people. Murders were committed well before EOKA B' came to the fore. Some may argue that officially the government was not behind the killings. I have my serious doubts. In fact, not a single person was persecuted for engaging in such activities. In fact, no case was ever opened, meaning that the government had no will to investicate the murders. Take for example the three boys from Aredhiou. The local police arrested them one night in the early 60's and no one has seen them since.
Even if we agree that State organs were involved in killings of TCs in the 1960's, how does this make the entire GC community guilty of that? What proves that these killings were "sponsored" (i.e. ordered) by the GC leadership? What about killings committed by the TMT? TMT was an organisation "sponsored" by the TC leadership and Turkey. Does that mean that the entire TC community is to be held responsible for these crimes?
Members of the Turkish army, including low ranking officers of this army, have committed many atrocities in 1974. The Turkish government sponsors the Turkish Army! Does that mean that these atrocities were ordered by the Turkish Army’s top leadership, or by the Turkish government? Does that mean that the entire Turkish nation and the entire TC community are to be held responsible and guilty for all those crimes that happened in Cyprus in 1974? Has anybody from those TMT members or from the Turkish army ever been convicted and punished by their State for all those crimes?
Is this they way administrate and measure the amount of the blame on each community?
Bananiot wrote:Of course, one should remember that it all started when we decided unilaterally to pursue our enosis dream, almost the day after we put our signature on the London-Zurich agreements. Makarios and most GC leaders at the time saw the agreements just as a stepping stone to achieve enosis. We never believed in the RoC. Now, we cry our hearts out for the TC's to come back to it. We are not even being funny ...
Who is the WE that you mention above? Is it the entire GC community?
As far as I know there were those GC nationalists who had continued their Enosis "dream" from the 1950's further into the years after "independence," in the same way that many TC nationalists, organised under the TMT, had continued their Taxim dream from the 1950's into the years after "independence."
Makarios had only tried to change some articles of the constitution that were giving excessive powers to the TC community, in his opinion more than needed! The TC leadership not only refused to negotiate on these proposals but also, taking advantage of the intercommunal clashes, decided in “one night” to set up their own separate government in order to function as a state within state, as it was their plan to do so (this plan came into light as it was drafted in writing,) and thus set up the first mile stone that would have let them to their partition goal. As a result, the RoC remained in the hands of the GC community. Makarios didn't impose those changes nor he had envisioned the complete removal of the TCs from the RoC when he was preparing these proposals. Those intercommunal clashes, you may argue, were the responsibility and the initiative of the GC leadership. Perhaps yes! But you also need to explain to me why the TC leadership was arming the TCs to the teeth since 1958, and also why they had chosen to immediately fight back in all other areas of Cyprus and invite even more attacks in this way? More importantly, why had they chosen to immediately occupy the entire mountains surrounding the Nicosia /Kyrenia passage? Who they were supposed to defend up on the mountains, if the only reason was not to safeguard the bridging of the Kyrenia seaport for the Turkish Army to land there and safely transfer army in Cyprus for their partition plans? In a nutshell, both communities’ leaderships had their own agendas and their own plans and to simply load the entire blame on one side exclusively, in view of all the above facts, is just playing ostrich, otherwise you have to accept that you have some kind a masochistic inclination to constantly “whip” your own self.