http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news- ... azard.html
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/96954 ... ioner.html
Olli Rehn calls for investigation of the gigantic turkish flags.
SKI-preo wrote:http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-200432-102-eu-to-investigate-whether-kktc-flag-is-environmental-hazard.html
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/96954 ... ioner.html
Olli Rehn calls for investigation of the gigantic turkish flags.
B25 wrote:SKI-preo wrote:http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-200432-102-eu-to-investigate-whether-kktc-flag-is-environmental-hazard.html
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/96954 ... ioner.html
Olli Rehn calls for investigation of the gigantic turkish flags.
This in itself should have been our first demand. We should have damanded its removal BEFORE ANY talks took place. It is discraceful that we are negotiating under these dictorial conditions and the TCs still insist we are the bad guys , Fuck hell!
insan wrote:"We" too feel the same seeing "you" as the only legitimate representative of Cyprus though supposedly we share the guilt of collapsed RoC on 50/50 basis...
If there's anything to be investigated, it's the legitimacy of the so-called RoC not the symbolic flags of any size seen anywhere...
insan wrote:B25 wrote:SKI-preo wrote:http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-200432-102-eu-to-investigate-whether-kktc-flag-is-environmental-hazard.html
http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/96954 ... ioner.html
Olli Rehn calls for investigation of the gigantic turkish flags.
This in itself should have been our first demand. We should have damanded its removal BEFORE ANY talks took place. It is discraceful that we are negotiating under these dictorial conditions and the TCs still insist we are the bad guys , Fuck hell!
"We" too feel the same seeing "you" as the only legitimate representative of Cyprus though supposedly we share the guilt of collapsed RoC on 50/50 basis...
If there's anything to be investigated, it's the legitimacy of the so-called RoC not the symbolic flags of any size seen anywhere...
Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:"We" too feel the same seeing "you" as the only legitimate representative of Cyprus though supposedly we share the guilt of collapsed RoC on 50/50 basis...
If there's anything to be investigated, it's the legitimacy of the so-called RoC not the symbolic flags of any size seen anywhere...
Instead of fantasizing ridiculous scenarios, why don’t you be a good boy and point to where in the RoC constitution it says that if the “Turkish Cypriots” spit the dummy and start running around like a headless chicken, the constitution is dissolved!
Now get to work sailor...
http://www.kypros.org/Constitution/English/
THE FIRST 10 YEARS
IN 1964, however, the Security Council was so-confident of the success of the UN Force, its mandate was for six months only. Of all the options which Makarios had reviewed in 1964, UNFICYP was the most acceptable, for it recognised him alone as the President, his authority as legal, Cyprus as independent and therefore, by implication, his right to change the Constitution and other laws as the Greek Cypriots saw fit. Makarios and his supporters also believed Turkey would never dare attack and that the Cypriot Turks could now be controlled by an exclusively Greek Cypriot-managed government.
According to the UN: "Throughout 1964 and later Makarios and the Greek Cypriot leadership adopted the view that the establishment of UNFICYP had set aside the rights of intervention granted to the Guarantor Powers - Britain, Greece and Turkey - by the Treaty of Guarantee." The Greek Cypriots considered the constitution and treaty provisions were "flexible" and "subject to change". Turkish Cypriots took a diametrically opposed position. They are fixed agreements and not subject to change, they insisted. The Archbishop's assumptions proved very wrong during the next decade. For the time being, however, it was up to UNFICYP to deploy its 7,000 troops, who were volunteers from Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Ireland and the UK. They were commanded by Lt General Gyani from India. He reported directly to the UN Secretary-General. Britain found itself making the largest contribution to the Force, both with personnel and logistical support. The UN maintains this Force is the most cost-effective operation run from New York. From that moment two classes of British soldier were created in Cyprus: those who were retained at the Sovereign Bases of Episkopi in the West and Dhekelia in the East, directly under British command, and those who wore the Blue Beret and whose orders came from the Secretary General of the UN.
IN 1964 - and for the next 10 years - UNFICYP soldiers were deployed island-wide. They took up positions wherever there was "a threatened minority", which meant the Cypriot Turks. There were other difficulties as well for the UN troops. Whose "law and order" were they to "maintain and restore"? Cypriot Turks, thrown out from the official Government, were managing their own affairs in their enclaves. What could UNFICYP do if the Greek Cypriot administration passed laws which Cypriot Turks deemed unconstitutional and refused to obey? After all, Cypriot Turks were never going to "request' or "agree" anything of which they disapproved. As far as they were concerned the original 1960 Republic ceased to exist the moment they were thrown out by Makarios from the state they had co-founded by international agreement. Equally difficult, therefore, for UNFICYP was how to implement the Security Council mandate which insisted the Force promote a return to "normal conditions" and "contribute to the security" of the communities in conflict.
ALMOST by definition, UNFICYP had its hands tied from the outset and could do little more than maintain the status quo. But as the Force could not act unilaterally, nor allowed to take preventive military action, it was unable to stop the Greek Cypriots from continuing their attacks or blockading the Cypriot Turks. Time and time again, UN soldiers who tried to prevent massacres by the Greeks were disarmed and marched away or left to watch and then to report the details of the incident. It is a fact, however, that where there were British troops, there were few hostile incidents or if there were, the attackers were given short shrift by the "squaddies" and their officers.
Return to Cyprus and the European Union
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests