The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sun Jan 31, 2010 2:30 pm

Tim Drayton wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
yialousa1971 wrote:A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Yeah, he's building a monstrous church where the old Ayia Paraskevi is opposite the Hilton! :roll:


What? I thought Qatar was building some kind of holiday complex there.


That's on the East. Ayia Paraskevi is on the south side. "opposite" was wrong term :wink:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Postby Get Real! » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:09 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
yialousa1971 wrote:A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Yeah, he's building a monstrous church where the old Ayia Paraskevi is opposite the Hilton! :roll:


What? I thought Qatar was building some kind of holiday complex there.


That's on the East. Ayia Paraskevi is on the south side. "opposite" was wrong term :wink:

Ok, it's across the southern entrance of the Cyprus Hilton! :roll:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:35 pm

miltiades wrote:The Archbishop ought to stay out of politics , alternatively get rid of the beard , wear a suit , no tie please in Summer months , and join the political spectrum.


Career politicians are boring!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Re: A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Postby DT. » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:36 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Tim Drayton wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
yialousa1971 wrote:A plan is afoot that’s worse than Annan

Yeah, he's building a monstrous church where the old Ayia Paraskevi is opposite the Hilton! :roll:


What? I thought Qatar was building some kind of holiday complex there.


That's on the East. Ayia Paraskevi is on the south side. "opposite" was wrong term :wink:

Ok, it's across the southern entrance of the Cyprus Hilton! :roll:


Why don't you just say where APOEL is so that everyone understands 8)
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby DTA » Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:14 pm

I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby YFred » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:36 pm

DTA wrote:I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?

There is nothing to believe. The church has made it's position clear. Anybody who votes yes to peace is destined for hell. hat other information do you need to come to the correct conclusion.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby DTA » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:47 pm

YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?

There is nothing to believe. The church has made it's position clear. Anybody who votes yes to peace is destined for hell. hat other information do you need to come to the correct conclusion.


Just wanted to see what the GC thought?

What does the church have to lose?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby YFred » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:49 pm

DTA wrote:
YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?

There is nothing to believe. The church has made it's position clear. Anybody who votes yes to peace is destined for hell. hat other information do you need to come to the correct conclusion.


Just wanted to see what the GC thought?

What does the church have to lose?

Hellenising the whole island. They want it all.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby kurupetos » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:52 pm

YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:
YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?

There is nothing to believe. The church has made it's position clear. Anybody who votes yes to peace is destined for hell. hat other information do you need to come to the correct conclusion.


Just wanted to see what the GC thought?

What does the church have to lose?

Hellenising the whole island. They want it all.


No, that's what you want. Shame on you. :x
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby DTA » Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:54 pm

YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:
YFred wrote:
DTA wrote:I have a couple of questions?

do you guys think that the church in south is against any reasonably attainable solution?

and if so why?

There is nothing to believe. The church has made it's position clear. Anybody who votes yes to peace is destined for hell. hat other information do you need to come to the correct conclusion.


Just wanted to see what the GC thought?

What does the church have to lose?

Hellenising the whole island. They want it all.


Is this still their position?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests