Cyprus-Forum.com

[Tim Drayton]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

[Kifeas]

http://www.londragazete.co.uk/publish/issue%20465/print/page44.pdf

Is there any chance of talking about this article without the usual mudslinging and name calling? I do hope so

You are indeed very funny, Daisy May, (or should I say Daisy Duck!) You are indeed funny, as much as this friend of yours, Sibel! You come here and post a link to a completely one-sided propaganda article -a mudslinging tornado by itself, against the Greek Cypriots; yet you have the nerve to ask for comments "without the usual mudslinging and name calling!" Very funny indeed, you are!

[yorgozlu]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

[Gasman]

Is there any chance of talking about this article without the usual mudslinging and name calling? I do hope so

There are many ways to open a subject for debate. Opening it like this is almost asking for what you say you don't want!

[Svetlana]

http://www.londragazete.co.uk/publish/issue%20465/print/page44.pdf

Is there any chance of talking about this article without the usual mudslinging and name calling? I do hope so

You are indeed very funny, Daisy May, (or should I say Daisy Duck!) You are indeed funny, as much as this friend of yours, Sibel! You come here and post a link to a completely one-sided propaganda article -a mudslinging tornado by itself, against the Greek Cypriots; yet you have the nerve to ask for comments "without the usual mudslinging and name calling!" Very funny indeed, you are!

Is that because people here are no longer capable of debate and refutable comment? If so, it is very sad.

[Tim Drayton]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

If you were not aware of this, Nezire Sofi is a Turkish Cypriot who has regained what is rightly hers.

[yorgozlu]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

If you were not aware of this, Nezire Sofi is a Turkish Cypriot who has regained what is rightly hers.

Don't you mean,she had sold it because SHE no longer wishes to RETURN?
Indeed I am,as well as being AWARE of your Greek TACTICS.

[Tim Drayton]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

If you were not aware of this, Nezire Sofi is a Turkish Cypriot who has regained what is rightly hers.

Don't you mean,she had sold it because SHE no longer wishes to RETURN?
Indeed I am,as well as being AWARE of your Greek TACTICS.

What has she sold?

[yorgozlu]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

If you were not aware of this, Nezire Sofi is a Turkish Cypriot who has regained what is rightly hers.

Don't you mean,she had sold it because SHE no longer wishes to RETURN?
Indeed I am,as well as being AWARE of your Greek TACTICS.

What has she sold?

Surely,she did not get 500.000 euros for nothing!!
SELLING=COMPENSATION
Would you not agree?

[Tim Drayton]

With reference to the following quote from the article:

What about the land in the South belonging to Turkish Cypriots that
has been occupied, sold, and misappropriated by Greek Cypriots?

I hope that, now the Orams case has set a precedent, Turkish Cypriots will also pursue their legitmate rights through the international courts.

In the free parts of Cyprus the Turkish Cypriot properties were not sold or misappropriated. They are only used to

(1) House the refugees whose own houses were taken by the Turks.
(2) Expropriated by the government to build public infrastructure (roads, schools, airports etc) in the same way that any other property is expropriated.

We have only targeted foreigners in the occupied areas, but if the TCs want to target the GC refugees, then they should be certain that a ton of law suits against TCs will follow and the TCs have a lot more to lose than gain if they start this game.

In fact I hope they will do it, so it will be then be proven beyond any doubt that there was never any such thing as an "exchange" of properties, and that all people want to return to their own homes and they do not want any kind of exchange.

Some Turkish Cypriots allege otherwise, so why do they not now follow the course of action taken by Apostolides and Sofi?

Would you like some JAM on your BREAD and BUTTER as well.

If you were not aware of this, Nezire Sofi is a Turkish Cypriot who has regained what is rightly hers.

Don't you mean,she had sold it because SHE no longer wishes to RETURN?
Indeed I am,as well as being AWARE of your Greek TACTICS.

What has she sold?

Surely,she did not get 500.000 euros for nothing!!
SELLING=COMPENSATION
Would you not agree?

No, in the out of court settlement, Nezire Sofi:

1- secured the return of her land in Larnca, and
2- accepted 500,000 euro in compensation (for having been denied the use of this land).