The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Tony Angastiniotis answers to Cyprus Forum

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby insan » Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:14 am

am not going to get into the legality question. in any case i dont really believe in international laws.


You are still trying to redifine the de-fact situation as legal or illegal. De-facto means de-facto.

i tottaly agree with you on the realities though. u r right about the fear that sampson caused.


The fear that Sampson caused? Was he alone? Who were behind and beside him giving orders and helping to him from 55' and onwards untill 1974 and even until 1978? Who forced Makarios to sign the amnesty for all Eoka-B members who were active and still were threatining Makarios until 1978?

The facts is not that simple my friend?

i also agree that we have to face the realities (right or wrong) that turkeish army is here and will leave only with a solution.


Turkish army is in Cyprus and Greece army is not?

Code: Select all
Let's see what this looks like graphically.

Slide 3. Current Order of Battle

-- Turkish Army corps with approximately 30,000 soldiers

-- Turkish Cypriot Security Force with about 4,000 soldiers

-- UNFICYP controlling the buffer zone with approximately 1,250 military and civilian personnel from 20 different countries

-- Greek Army armored brigade of about 4,000

-- Greek Cypriot National Guard with about 15,000 soldiers, some of which are from Greece, plus a ready reserve force of 35,000 soldiers

The result is a total force of 54,000 soldiers actively engaged in the defense and protection of Cyprus and its two communities.


Securing the Peace
by Col. Stephen R. Norton, U.S. Army, Ret.
Delivered at a Western Policy Center conference
"A Cyprus Settlement in 2004? Policy Implications in Turkey, NATO, and the EU"

St. Regis Hotel, Washington, D.C.
February 26, 2004


http://www.westernpolicy.org/Conference ... tation.asp

Greece currently has 4000 plus soldiers in South of Cyprus. Why 4000 + and not more? Do you think if she has a huge army like Turk's she wouldn't have stationed more troops in the South of Cyprus? Do you thi
nk that if TCs have had 15000 soldiers and 35000 ready reserve force Turkey would have stationed 35000 soldiers in North of Cyprus?

One way or another both parties have been violating the international laws, treaties and constitution of RoC from 63 and onwards.

but please,
dont tell me that the operation had the only purpose the tcs.
turkey served also its geostrategic plans with the excuse we gave.


It wasn't an excuse for Turkey. It was cristal clear that both parties exerted all their efforts to get what they want on Cyprus. It was a 2 legged war game played on Cyprus.

1- The political leg: Played by the then politicians of Turks, Hellenes, Allies and Russia.

2- The underground leg: Played by the then politicians of Turks, Hellenes, Allies, Russia, underground organizations of Turks and Hellenes and secret services of world's super powers.

Moreover, do you think that geo-strategically Cyprus is less important for Greece than Turkey? Then you are missing the whole point in this age of globalization and new world order.

Code: Select all
[06] Greece is here, Stephanopoulos tells Archbishop
Nicosia, Jun 25 (CNA) -- Greek President Costis Stephanopoulos reassured the people of Cyprus in a most emphatic manner that Greece will stand by Cyprus in its struggle for freedom and justice and will assist the Republic in facing Turkish threats.
In a thinly veiled warning to Turkey, the Greek President told his neighbouring country that its shores are too close to the Greek islands in the Aegean and not the other way round.

"Greece is here because Cyprus is Greece," Stephanopoulos told the Primate of the Church of Cyprus, Archbishop Chrysostomos, when the latter welcomed him at the Archbishopric Palace.

The Greek President, who arrived here today for a four-day official visit, said "Greece is here not as an ally or even a supporter but because Cyprus is Greece."

He noted that Greece has not only legal but also moral, national and patriotic obligations to Cyprus, which it will not relinquish.

"Greece and Cyprus are not two separate entities, they are not two separate nations, they are one nation, two states," he stressed, noting that common goals makes them identify with each other in their objectives.

Greece, he said, aims to secure not only its territorial integrity and that of Cyprus but also its national dignity and pride.

"Under these circumstances, the joint defence pact will continue to exist from Thrace to Cyprus, where hellenism is under pressure and faces expansionist disposition," Stephanopoulos said.

He underlined that the struggle for justice will not be concluded unless Cyprus is vindicated, explaining that Greece and Cyprus have their love for their country and their just cause as weapons in this struggle.

"Distances have no value. Turkey believes that the large Aegean islands are too close to its shores. No, their shores are too close to the Greek islands," he said.

Describing the current situation in the Cyprus question as "difficult", Stephanopoulos said Turkey has violated a fundamental principle governing international relations, that differences between nations should be resolved on the basis of international law.

Addressing the international community, Stephanopoulos said it is expected to support the just cause of the people of Cyprus.

The Archbishop welcomed the Greek President, describing his visit as telling proof of Greece's support for Cyprus in its struggle for freedom from the continuing occupation by Turkey of the island's northern part.

Expressing his opposition to a federal Cyprus, the Archbishop said with a divisive solution under the guise of federation they are trying to create such conditions that would offer the possibility and pretext to Turkey to seize the entire island.

"We extend our arms and expect to see yours uniting with ours to enable us to achieve freedom for Cyprus," he told the Greek President, the first Greek head of state to visit Cyprus.

He also warned that if Turkish designs on Cyprus succeed, then Turkey will eye the Aegean islands.


the way i see it is that turkey always was in favor of partition. she was simply much more politically clever and waited for the stupid gc to give her the right excuse.


Again, she wasn't waiting for an excuse to get what she wants. Turks have always had Plan A, Plan B, Plan C etc... The Plan A of Turks has always been a united Cyprus that the TC community will be the politically equal state partner of GC community. However Hellenes have never wished such a thing; instead they have always wanted a Hellenic Cyprus that the TC community is a minority just like Turks in Greece.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby insan » Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:27 am

"Distances have no value. Turkey believes that the large Aegean islands are too close to its shores. No, their shores are too close to the Greek islands," he said.



:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby cypezokyli » Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:28 am

my friend insan

The fear that Sampson caused? Was he alone? Who were behind and beside him giving orders and helping to him from 55' and onwards untill 1974 and even until 1978? Who forced Makarios to sign the amnesty for all Eoka-B members who were active and still were threatining Makarios until 1978?


u r perfectly right

when it comes to the turkish army, i have never argued that the greek army is not here. it was said by 2fan that turkish army is here and we should accept it. and i accepted it.
how would you like it if the greek army left, and the national guard and so the turkish army? wouldnt it be better?
for one thinf, at least me and you wouldnt waste such a big chunk of our lifes in the stupid army

One way or another both parties have been violating the international laws, treaties and constitution of RoC from 63 and onwards


totally agree



It wasn't an excuse for Turkey. It was cristal clear that both parties exerted all their efforts to get what they want on Cyprus. It was a 2 legged war game played on Cyprus.


agreed as well
didnt you notice in my previous post? i said:
and the gc targets at the time were no better ofcource (enosis).


i just can not stand in both sides their attitude towards their old leadreship, which has brought only hate, blood, and division.
i believe that our leadership indeed wanted enosis and i believe yours wanted partition.
let me repead: the leadership.
i just believe that you were just a little bit more clever.

i lately read makarios drousiotis book. (i dont know if u know him. he is the first reporter ever to publish books against eoka or makarios)
unfortunately i dont have the book in germany.
but i am sure bananiot will have it :)
bananiot please give him the exact pages.
in any case, there were two secret plans for cyprus.
the akritas is the one we made.
the turkish one, was planning already from the 1960s the presence of settlers in cyprus.
what i found more amazing was, that the plan could forsee the stupidity of our leadership and the orders given were: we should not fire first. we should let the gcs take the blame. we are willing to suffer the first casualties.
what can i say?
from a political point of view i have to say i recognise the superiority of the turkish leadrship.
from a human perspective, they are as bad as we are. they were even ready to suffer casualties just to serve their interests.

as for greek president papadopoullos.
you didnt have to place the whole thing to convince me on what he said.
firstly, the greek presidents only real responsibility is to drink coffee with some foreign diplomats.
it is the PM who defines the foreign policy.
and since greece had simitis or now karamanlis and turkey erdogan the relationships between greece and turkey are improving.
greece has also changed its whole policy in regard to the turkish accession in the EU.


The Plan A of Turks has always been a united Cyprus that the TC community will be the politically equal state partner of GC community. However Hellenes have never wished such a thing; instead they have always wanted a Hellenic Cyprus that the TC community is a minority just like Turks in Greece.


as before we agree on the hellenes targets (as you call them very beautifully)
but i dont really agree on the turkish ones


you also didnt answer to two questions that i posted above:
1. "it was as you say the only way to force the greeks to an agreement. lets agree on that. the 30years of the denktash era, are, i am afraid proving exactly the opposite. the acceptable unification plan i am really sorry to say it was no number 1 priority. "

2. "lastly, i think we do agree that the aftermath has caused a lot of pain.
i dont know if there were any other ways to protect the tc rights without having so many people leaving their houses. i guess if one would really wanted ,one could have found one"

have a nice day
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby 2fan » Wed Sep 14, 2005 9:57 am

cypezokyli wrote:my friend insan

The fear that Sampson caused? Was he alone? Who were behind and beside him giving orders and helping to him from 55' and onwards untill 1974 and even until 1978? Who forced Makarios to sign the amnesty for all Eoka-B members who were active and still were threatining Makarios until 1978?


u r perfectly right

when it comes to the turkish army, i have never argued that the greek army is not here. it was said by 2fan that turkish army is here and we should accept it. and i accepted it.
how would you like it if the greek army left, and the national guard and so the turkish army? wouldnt it be better?
for one thinf, at least me and you wouldnt waste such a big chunk of our lifes in the stupid army

One way or another both parties have been violating the international laws, treaties and constitution of RoC from 63 and onwards


totally agree



It wasn't an excuse for Turkey. It was cristal clear that both parties exerted all their efforts to get what they want on Cyprus. It was a 2 legged war game played on Cyprus.


agreed as well
didnt you notice in my previous post? i said:
and the gc targets at the time were no better ofcource (enosis).


i just can not stand in both sides their attitude towards their old leadreship, which has brought only hate, blood, and division.
i believe that our leadership indeed wanted enosis and i believe yours wanted partition.
let me repead: the leadership.
i just believe that you were just a little bit more clever.

I totally agree with you!!!! If we are to find a solution all dinosaur politicians must go. They have no room in the present political atmosphere. It's time to bury the past and look to the future.

i lately read makarios drousiotis book. (i dont know if u know him. he is the first reporter ever to publish books against eoka or makarios)
unfortunately i dont have the book in germany.
but i am sure bananiot will have it :)
bananiot please give him the exact pages.
in any case, there were two secret plans for cyprus.
the akritas is the one we made.
the turkish one, was planning already from the 1960s the presence of settlers in cyprus.
what i found more amazing was, that the plan could forsee the stupidity of our leadership and the orders given were: we should not fire first. we should let the gcs take the blame. we are willing to suffer the first casualties.
what can i say?
from a political point of view i have to say i recognise the superiority of the turkish leadrship.
from a human perspective, they are as bad as we are. they were even ready to suffer casualties just to serve their interests.

as for greek president papadopoullos.
you didnt have to place the whole thing to convince me on what he said.
firstly, the greek presidents only real responsibility is to drink coffee with some foreign diplomats.
it is the PM who defines the foreign policy.
and since greece had simitis or now karamanlis and turkey erdogan the relationships between greece and turkey are improving.
greece has also changed its whole policy in regard to the turkish accession in the EU.


The Plan A of Turks has always been a united Cyprus that the TC community will be the politically equal state partner of GC community. However Hellenes have never wished such a thing; instead they have always wanted a Hellenic Cyprus that the TC community is a minority just like Turks in Greece.


as before we agree on the hellenes targets (as you call them very beautifully)
but i dont really agree on the turkish ones

I don't either.


you also didnt answer to two questions that i posted above:
1. "it was as you say the only way to force the greeks to an agreement. lets agree on that. the 30years of the denktash era, are, i am afraid proving exactly the opposite. the acceptable unification plan i am really sorry to say it was no number 1 priority. "

That was my personal opinion. I have no proof of this. I agree with you that Denktash was and remains as no help but he also fits my definition of a fossilised politician just as Tassos does. But Denktash is no longer calling the shots. We need new blood.

2. "lastly, i think we do agree that the aftermath has caused a lot of pain.
i dont know if there were any other ways to protect the tc rights without having so many people leaving their houses. i guess if one would really wanted ,one could have found one"

Absolutely agreed. It is dispicable that a population has to suffer so much because politicians can not agree. But what are we, as a people, prepared to do about it?

have a nice day

You too!
User avatar
2fan
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby cypezokyli » Wed Sep 14, 2005 1:25 pm

it feels so nice when we can agree 2fan
:D :D :D :D :D

lets hope we will manage to agree for the future as well
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby Bananiot » Wed Sep 14, 2005 2:51 pm

Makarios Droushiotis happens to be a friend of mine. We move in the same constellation, as S. Denktash said about Papadopoulos. The book you are reading "first partition" is now available in Turkish, so Insan may have it already.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby 2fan » Wed Sep 14, 2005 3:59 pm

cypezokyli wrote:it feels so nice when we can agree 2fan
:D :D :D :D :D

lets hope we will manage to agree for the future as well




I hope so too my friend. :wink:
User avatar
2fan
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby Nikiforos » Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:53 am

2fan:

My first post on this site struck a raw nerve with you.

STOP RATTLING YOUR CAGE.

It is ABSOLUTELY RELEVANT to this discussion as to who pays Angastiniotis. His employment at EMU compromises his credibility. He has an agenda against his own group. He let his self-hate get the best of him. If his intent was to be truly objective, why did he not also write about the barbaric atrocities committed by the Turks and their agents, the TC's?

You should know that your Turkish patrons wrote the book on how to commit genocide. Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk has been arrested because he dared to speak the truth about the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE. This year Hitler's Mein Kampf was a bestseller in Turkey. Some things never change.

I believe that Sampson was a criminal and that Enosis should NOT have been pursued. You WRONGLY ASSUMED that I was a supporter. I am sorry if innocent Turks were killed. Are you sorry that the Turks killed innocent Greeks?
User avatar
Nikiforos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby Nikiforos » Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:26 am

2fan:

The second stage of the Turkish INVASION revealed that the Turks' true intent was not to protect the TC's but to ILLEGALLY grab the island. Turkey has Frequently threatened to annex the northern part of the island over the past 30 years.

DON'T BLASPHEME AGAINST MY GOD (as you did in your post)because you are a nonbeliever.

Sadly, the world does NOT care about Cyprus. The filthy Anglos and Americans favor Turkey because they wrongly believe that this will prevent a "clash of civilations." When the clash comes, Turkey will be at ground zero.

The Muslim world in general and the Turks in particular are unable to get along with others. In recent times the Turks have invaded Cyprus, threatened war against Greece, and blockaded Armenia. To show that they are an equal opportunity aggressor, they have threatened war against Syria (a fellow Muslim nation) and practiced wholesale slaughter of their own Kurdish (Muslim) population. I would not be surprised to see the Kurds use Cyprus as a precedent as they pursue independence from Turkey. They make up 18% of the Turkish population. Why should they not DEMAND 39% of Turkish land to set up their own state? FAIR IS FAIR. Perhaps the Kurds will settle for a bizonal, bicommunal federation with Turkey.

TURKEY WILL NOT BECOME A MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. The majority of Europeans can't stomach that idea. THE POLITICIANS ARE WRONG. THE PEOPLE ARE RIGHT. THE TURKS DO NOT BELONG IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.

THE TEXAS HEAT HAS AFFECTED YOUR BRAIN AND MADE YOU DELIRIOUS. COOL OFF AND FACE REALITY.
User avatar
Nikiforos
Member
Member
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:04 pm
Location: USA

Postby 2fan » Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:29 am

Nikiforos wrote:2fan:

My first post on this site struck a raw nerve with you.

STOP RATTLING YOUR CAGE.

It is ABSOLUTELY RELEVANT to this discussion as to who pays Angastiniotis. His employment at EMU compromises his credibility. He has an agenda against his own group. He let his self-hate get the best of him. If his intent was to be truly objective, why did he not also write about the barbaric atrocities committed by the Turks and their agents, the TC's?

TAKE A LONG LOOK IN THE MIRROR THEN YOU WILL SEE THE TRUE BARBARIAN WHO STARTED THE CONFLICT ON THE ISLAND.

YOU STILL SHOW NO PROOF OF EMU SPREADING LIES.


YOU ARE BESIDE YOURSELF BECAUSE A GREEK SAW THE TRUTH AND DARED TO SPEAK ABOUT IT.

You should know that your Turkish patrons wrote the book on how to commit genocide. Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk has been arrested because he dared to speak the truth about the ARMENIAN GENOCIDE. This year Hitler's Mein Kampf was a bestseller in Turkey. Some things never change.

ORHAN PAMUK ALSO FAILED TO MENTION THAT FOR EVERY ARMENIAN THAT WAS KILLED 4 MUSLIMS DIED. IT WAS A WAR YOU MORON.

I believe that Sampson was a criminal and that Enosis should NOT have been pursued. You WRONGLY ASSUMED that I was a supporter. I am sorry if innocent Turks were killed. Are you sorry that the Turks killed innocent Greeks?


I AM SORRY FOR ANY INNOCENT PEOPLE GETTING KILLED BE IT TURK OR GREEK. BUT YOUR POSTS SHOW YOUR TRUE COLORS. COLORS OF A STINKING RACIST
User avatar
2fan
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest