Cyprus-Forum.com

[YFred]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

[DT.]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

Try following the red line freddy, you'll find its on scale and accurate.

But you're right all these maps with scales on them are no match for your math wizardry of dividing by 7 and subtracting 1.5% to fix the margin of error.

[Oracle]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

[DT.]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

[YFred]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

It just goes to show how clueless you are about Cyprus. You can't see the Lurucina lands on the map, but I can. That's the difference between us dearest.

[YFred]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

That's not funny, that site has nothing to do with me sunshine.

[DT.]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

That's not funny, that site has nothing to do with me sunshine.

don't be shy mate they're great twitters..."have you seen my concentration?" priceless

[Oracle]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

That's not funny, that site has nothing to do with me sunshine.

don't be shy mate they're great twitters..."have you seen my concentration?" priceless

Don't insult the poor woman's intelligence by suggesting she has anything to do with our number cruncher from "Lurucina Land" ... as only visible by him!

[YFred]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

That's not funny, that site has nothing to do with me sunshine.

don't be shy mate they're great twitters..."have you seen my concentration?" priceless

Don't insult the poor woman's intelligence by suggesting she has anything to do with our number cruncher from "Lurucina Land" ... as only visible by him!

Ok just this time I'll try to educate you and mark the Lurucina lands on the map, but I wouldn't hold my breath, I like living.

[Oracle]

... The map is clearly wrong. It was not drawn to any scale ...

Here's one drawn to scale:




That's probably more habitable land than the GCs were "enclaved" in at the time ...

No it is not. Lurucina is shown as 4 times the size. If you look the current border, it was within that and less. Kochat is the same. These maps are not to scale.
Next

What are you on about? It's not showing Lurucina but the blooming area occupied.

Surely you've demonstrated how clueless you are enough times for today ....

You know, this allergy to learning that Yfred's demonstrating is starting to explain the funny twitters he's been releasing lately.

http://twitter.com/Yfred

That's not funny, that site has nothing to do with me sunshine.

don't be shy mate they're great twitters..."have you seen my concentration?" priceless

Don't insult the poor woman's intelligence by suggesting she has anything to do with our number cruncher from "Lurucina Land" ... as only visible by him!

Ok just this time I'll try to educate you and mark the Lurucina lands on the map, but I wouldn't hold my breath, I like living.

I know where it is you dumbwit! The TCs occupied the area around there. They didn't all just live in your house!