CopperLine wrote:Ultimately the judgment on Apostiledes v Orams was the right one, in my view.
I look forward, though, to the day when TCs with claims in the RoC can enjoy effective remedy for their claims. Despite what some people have claimed in recent threads on this matter, TCs have been prevented from access to and recovery of their former properties. One further product of the A v O case may be, ironically, that it eases the claims by TCs in the RoC.
I also look forward to TCs finally turning on the crooked politicians, developers and estate agents who led them up the blind alley that was "exchange title" and the theft of real estate and other property.
But posters should also realise that whilst the A v O case opens a new and effective avenue of remedy, it does not necessarily open the flood gates. It will still need individual GC property owners to pursue individual actions against named individuals who have alleged to have violated their property rights (or other rights). That is, as we know, a long, often complicated, and twisted process, which invariably requires a litigant to already have some money up front to finance the whole legal action.
Hermes and Viewpoint arrests are highly, highly unlikely because what we're talking about are civil actions, not criminal actions.
Finally a voice of reason in all this madness. Thanks Copperline.
The FACT IS 3 out of the 4 GC TV channels downgraded these news as 3rd or 4rth in importance last night. Probably they were directed to do so, knowing damn well that the RoC law for the Guardian of Tc properties holds a lot of water. I am most certain that at this point the Government will not allow any flood of sueings, and it will postpone as much as it can hearings at courts.
There is one point i think is not right in your post though. All decisions will be taken by RoC courts. Then it's a matter of compliance. If the accused does not comply to the decission of the courts, his offense is no longer Civil but defaults to criminal for contempt of court decision. Then s/he is liable to arrest.