Expatkiwi wrote:To me, I felt it rather absurd that a majority (the GC's) would feel threatened by a minority (the TC's), and that on that basis, moves for enosis and TC marginialization bore the hallmarks of crude bullying tactics. The non-presence of the Turkish Cypriots in government and the enclaves (likened to Bantustans) made me conclude that the Greek Cypriots had no interest in sharing with the Turkish Cypriots, so when I read about the attempted coup, and Turkey's response, my reaction was that the bullies ended up getting their asses kicked because the bullied had a friend to defend them (Turkey). Bullies getting themselves bullied back to me is pure poetic justice.
So, when the 1983 UDI took place, it seemed to be to be logical, given that the majority didn't want the minority, so the minority made their own country. Simplistic, I know, but my favoring the Turkish Cypriots was a mixture of logic and sympathy.
Over the years, especially after I emigrated to the USA, I met and got to know a number of Turkish Cypriot migrants to the USA, and what they told me confirmed that my stance was the morally correct one. My disdain for the GC's grew over the isolations imposed on North Cyprus, which also served to reinforce my view of their being nothing more than a bullying mob.
Expatkiwi, as others have pointed out your pretext for supporting the TC stance on the basis they were 'bullied' by GCs completely ignores the historical context of Cyprus through the 1950s and into the 1960s. During the 1950s the GCs were the 'bullied', the bullies being the British colonial rulers aided and abetted by TCs who were provided with positions of authority as part of the 'divide and rule' policy commonly used during colonialism. The legacy of this was a flawed consitution when Cyprus achieved independence, one which, in my opinion, was not based on true democratic principles or application of human rights (TCs maintained unrepresentative power). This idea that TCs somehow deserve special privileges lead directly to the constitutional crises, the (Turkish-influenced?) TC policy in disengaging politically and socially (into enclaves), and ultimately to the 1974 invasion, and continued perception with some TCs that their community must have political equality (rather than one man one vote democracy) with the GCs.
Your other post that the TC kebab sellers were nicer than Greeks you met in NZ just indicates a shallowness to your thinking and is a pathetic explanation for your prejudice against GCs. If you cared to reflect on the positions of those huge numbers of displaced GCs and those that lost relatives and friends you might understand why GCs are holding out for a morally, politically and legally correct solution to the problem, and why they have little time for your half-baked stance.
I don't usually bother to engage with you because you come over as someone who sets out to
taunt GCs (how sad a reflection is that of your character?) when many of them show their pain and frustration at the loss of their land, the division of their nation, intransigence in finding a solution, and oppression by an invading force. It must be bad enough to be taunted by the TC partitionists, let alone someone such as yourself who claims to have never even visited Cyprus and to having no Cypriot connections other than your 'penpal' status with Denktash. This in itself is surely an indication that you are allowing yourself to be used by TCs for propaganda purposes.
Overall, your reasons for supporting TCs are historically flawed, prejudiced by meeting a couple of 'nice' TCs and the fact you are flattered to be acknowledged by Denktash, and in my opinion show you to have a very strange personality indeed!