The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Eroglu:Velvet Partition

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:43 pm

boulio wrote:much more of what?


Partition stance.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby ozlala » Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:13 am

thank you for welcoming me.
I don't think anyone is saying to the Greeks roll over and die nor did we ever wanted to get rid of the Greeks. we didn't even started the initial conflict. If in 1974 Greek army halted the aggression and left it the way it was then turkey would not have taken the action that they did. the Turkish Cypriots would have stayed as a second class citizen and just got on that way.
User avatar
ozlala
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:03 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Postby Oracle » Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:18 am

ozlala wrote:thank you for welcoming me.
I don't think anyone is saying to the Greeks roll over and die nor did we ever wanted to get rid of the Greeks. we didn't even started the initial conflict. If in 1974 Greek army halted the aggression and left it the way it was then turkey would not have taken the action that they did. the Turkish Cypriots would have stayed as a second class citizen and just got on that way.


Which one was that?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Tim Drayton » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:31 am

Nikitas wrote:"Does Eroğlu seriously want this?"

No Tim he does not. Like most TC and Turkish politicians he goes very much by the motto "the one I show you is not the one I will impale you with". And in any case, where would he live if Gc properties were returned? There is ample evidence that he has been one of the most active dealers in GC property.


That was a rhetorical question, as I am sure you are well aware.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby Tony-4497 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:07 am

Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...

1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.

2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.

3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.

4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.


I could live with an even higher %.. say 18% or even 20% max (land and coastline)

..but would need solid security guarantees and limits on flow of Turkish settlers in both states too (because the microstate will effectively be part of Turkey whatever the name is)
Tony-4497
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:09 pm
Location: Limassol

Postby Tony-4497 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:16 am

Happy negotiating, you will get much more of this if the polls are right and he is elected President.


Do you really believe this or just playing naive?

The leader of occupation is nothing more than a sad little puppet of Turkey who cannot even open a roadblock, or even fart, without the prior express approval of Turkey.

It makes f**k all of a difference if he is called Eroglou, Talat or Hasan..

Turkey alone will decide who the negotiator will be and what tune he will be singing (to best serve HER interests, not yours) and not the farce that you like to call "elections"..
Tony-4497
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:09 pm
Location: Limassol

Postby Oracle » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:22 pm

Tony-4497 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...

1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.

2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.

3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.

4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.


I could live with an even higher %.. say 18% or even 20% max (land and coastline)

..but would need solid security guarantees and limits on flow of Turkish settlers in both states too (because the microstate will effectively be part of Turkey whatever the name is)


Don't get carried away. I am sure GR! was joking. It's not about % of land, it's about territorial and sovereign integrity. It's about a future for our children free from the "smash and grab" mentality of their nearest neighbours. By relinquishing even 1% you have given them a prize for their wrongdoings, and they will continue chipping away at our heritage.

We have to do what's right and not give way to blackmail. We're talking thousands of years of civilisation where our people have striven to improve man's lot and here you are talking about just giving away to the foreign invaders "some" land and apologetically asking for "security" and guarantees! Have you learnt nothing? :roll:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Tony-4497 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:46 pm

Oracle wrote:
Tony-4497 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...

1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.

2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.

3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.

4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.


I could live with an even higher %.. say 18% or even 20% max (land and coastline)

..but would need solid security guarantees and limits on flow of Turkish settlers in both states too (because the microstate will effectively be part of Turkey whatever the name is)


Don't get carried away. I am sure GR! was joking. It's not about % of land, it's about territorial and sovereign integrity. It's about a future for our children free from the "smash and grab" mentality of their nearest neighbours. By relinquishing even 1% you have given them a prize for their wrongdoings, and they will continue chipping away at our heritage.

We have to do what's right and not give way to blackmail. We're talking thousands of years of civilisation where our people have striven to improve man's lot and here you are talking about just giving away to the foreign invaders "some" land and apologetically asking for "security" and guarantees! Have you learnt nothing? :roll:


Oracle

Do you know of even a single place that Turkey colonised with settlers which was later recovered by its rightful owners?

Sometimes, it's better to amputate a tiny part of your body in order to save the rest.. the alternative solution being discussed will just extend the rule of Turkey (through settlers, not TCs) to the entire island..

But for this to happen though, the part to lose needs to be really small.. otherwise, it makes more sense to keep fighting to save the entire island, through courts and blocking Turkey's EU path..
Tony-4497
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 373
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:09 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: Eroglu:Velvet Partition

Postby EPSILON » Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:19 pm

boulio wrote:Eroglu today stated that cyprus needs a velvet partition in the likes of czechoslovakia.He stated that the seperation should be agreed by both communities.He noted that people in the North are not concerned anymore for a solution and worry more about the economy.Since it looks like he will be the winner in aprils election i have a few questions:

Is there a G/C LEADER who would agree to a partition that is suitable to both sides?

And if there were a referendum do you think the G/C WOULD VOTE for it?

http://www.naftemporiki.gr/news/cstory.asp?id=1765025


I can be this person- giving you LOUROUTZINA and a boat to communicate with the rest World
User avatar
EPSILON
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: ATHENS

Postby Malapapa » Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:20 pm

Tony-4497 wrote:
Oracle

Do you know of even a single place that Turkey colonised with settlers which was later recovered by its rightful owners?


Here's a map...

Image
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests