boulio wrote:much more of what?
Partition stance.
ozlala wrote:thank you for welcoming me.
I don't think anyone is saying to the Greeks roll over and die nor did we ever wanted to get rid of the Greeks. we didn't even started the initial conflict. If in 1974 Greek army halted the aggression and left it the way it was then turkey would not have taken the action that they did. the Turkish Cypriots would have stayed as a second class citizen and just got on that way.
Nikitas wrote:"Does Eroğlu seriously want this?"
No Tim he does not. Like most TC and Turkish politicians he goes very much by the motto "the one I show you is not the one I will impale you with". And in any case, where would he live if Gc properties were returned? There is ample evidence that he has been one of the most active dealers in GC property.
Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...
1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.
2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.
3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.
4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.
Happy negotiating, you will get much more of this if the polls are right and he is elected President.
Tony-4497 wrote:Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...
1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.
2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.
3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.
4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.
I could live with an even higher %.. say 18% or even 20% max (land and coastline)
..but would need solid security guarantees and limits on flow of Turkish settlers in both states too (because the microstate will effectively be part of Turkey whatever the name is)
Oracle wrote:Tony-4497 wrote:Get Real! wrote:I would only accept if the TCs were to...
1. Take the 12.3% they actually owned and nothing more.
2. Build a 6m wall around themselves.
3. No entry to the RoC whatsoever.
4. No chance of the microstate ever being gifted to Turkey.
I could live with an even higher %.. say 18% or even 20% max (land and coastline)
..but would need solid security guarantees and limits on flow of Turkish settlers in both states too (because the microstate will effectively be part of Turkey whatever the name is)
Don't get carried away. I am sure GR! was joking. It's not about % of land, it's about territorial and sovereign integrity. It's about a future for our children free from the "smash and grab" mentality of their nearest neighbours. By relinquishing even 1% you have given them a prize for their wrongdoings, and they will continue chipping away at our heritage.
We have to do what's right and not give way to blackmail. We're talking thousands of years of civilisation where our people have striven to improve man's lot and here you are talking about just giving away to the foreign invaders "some" land and apologetically asking for "security" and guarantees! Have you learnt nothing?
boulio wrote:Eroglu today stated that cyprus needs a velvet partition in the likes of czechoslovakia.He stated that the seperation should be agreed by both communities.He noted that people in the North are not concerned anymore for a solution and worry more about the economy.Since it looks like he will be the winner in aprils election i have a few questions:
Is there a G/C LEADER who would agree to a partition that is suitable to both sides?
And if there were a referendum do you think the G/C WOULD VOTE for it?
http://www.naftemporiki.gr/news/cstory.asp?id=1765025
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests