Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
Your leader is currently negotiating a 2 state solution as backed by the UN and EU are you aware of this? if you do not agree with this then you cna reject it at the next referendum.
OK. Let's cut this crap once and for all.
Here are the two definitions of state:
a. politically organised body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially one that is sovereign;
b. one of the constituent units of a nation having a federal government.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/state
The President is negotiating using the 'b' definition, backed by the UN and EU. Talat is negotiating using the 'a' definition, backed by Turkey.
All free Cypriots and their president REJECT the 'a' definition but will negotiate the 'b' definition until the cows (or in our case donkeys) come home.
Do you get it now, Viewpoint?
So in short is it a 2 state solution whether its a or b?
No more constructive ambiguity, Viewpoint. It's a Kissinger tactics that has gotten us nowhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_ambiguity
It's a negotiated b. or nothing.
Viewpoint wrote:Get Real! wrote:Viewpoint wrote:So in short is it a 2 state solution whether its a or b?
The BBF “chance” is pretty much over.
Thin you should inform your leader.
Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
Your leader is currently negotiating a 2 state solution as backed by the UN and EU are you aware of this? if you do not agree with this then you cna reject it at the next referendum.
OK. Let's cut this crap once and for all.
Here are the two definitions of state:
a. politically organised body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially one that is sovereign;
b. one of the constituent units of a nation having a federal government.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/state
The President is negotiating using the 'b' definition, backed by the UN and EU. Talat is negotiating using the 'a' definition, backed by Turkey.
All free Cypriots and their president REJECT the 'a' definition but will negotiate the 'b' definition until the cows (or in our case donkeys) come home.
Do you get it now, Viewpoint?
So in short is it a 2 state solution whether its a or b?
No more constructive ambiguity, Viewpoint. It's a Kissinger tactics that has gotten us nowhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_ambiguity
It's a negotiated b. or nothing.
Its simple will there 2 states?
Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Malapapa wrote:Viewpoint wrote:
Your leader is currently negotiating a 2 state solution as backed by the UN and EU are you aware of this? if you do not agree with this then you cna reject it at the next referendum.
OK. Let's cut this crap once and for all.
Here are the two definitions of state:
a. politically organised body of people usually occupying a definite territory; especially one that is sovereign;
b. one of the constituent units of a nation having a federal government.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/state
The President is negotiating using the 'b' definition, backed by the UN and EU. Talat is negotiating using the 'a' definition, backed by Turkey.
All free Cypriots and their president REJECT the 'a' definition but will negotiate the 'b' definition until the cows (or in our case donkeys) come home.
Do you get it now, Viewpoint?
So in short is it a 2 state solution whether its a or b?
No more constructive ambiguity, Viewpoint. It's a Kissinger tactics that has gotten us nowhere.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_ambiguity
It's a negotiated b. or nothing.
Its simple will there 2 states?
No. Perhaps there will be two regions or units, if this can be agreed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests