The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The "Not in my Backyard" Brits; Islam4UK ... Not!

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby cyprusgrump » Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:48 am

Banning these people was a mistake IMHO. They were already banned under a different name and will keep changing the name or go 'underground' so they are harder to track.

Is the UK safer from Thursday because they are banned? No.

It is the shambolic Labour government that has let this ridiculous situation arise - to protect us from terrorism. :roll:

We need to question the motives of these people. They are committed to bringing Sharia law to the UK - that is one of their stated aims - yet they abuse the benefits system of the country they appear to openly despise.

They should be told to 'Fit in or Fuck Off'. There are plenty of other countries that share their views albeit not quite so generous with their taxpayer's money when it comes to benefits.
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby miltiades » Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:01 am

cyprusgrump wrote:Banning these people was a mistake IMHO. They were already banned under a different name and will keep changing the name or go 'underground' so they are harder to track.

Is the UK safer from Thursday because they are banned? No.

It is the shambolic Labour government that has let this ridiculous situation arise - to protect us from terrorism. :roll:

We need to question the motives of these people. They are committed to bringing Sharia law to the UK - that is one of their stated aims - yet they abuse the benefits system of the country they appear to openly despise.

They should be told to 'Fit in or Fuck Off'. There are plenty of other countries that share their views albeit not quite so generous with their taxpayer's money when it comes to benefits.

Deportation is in order , born here ? No difference . Enemies within must be eradicated !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby cyprusgrump » Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:58 am

miltiades wrote:
cyprusgrump wrote:Banning these people was a mistake IMHO. They were already banned under a different name and will keep changing the name or go 'underground' so they are harder to track.

Is the UK safer from Thursday because they are banned? No.

It is the shambolic Labour government that has let this ridiculous situation arise - to protect us from terrorism. :roll:

We need to question the motives of these people. They are committed to bringing Sharia law to the UK - that is one of their stated aims - yet they abuse the benefits system of the country they appear to openly despise.

They should be told to 'Fit in or Fuck Off'. There are plenty of other countries that share their views albeit not quite so generous with their taxpayer's money when it comes to benefits.

Deportation is in order , born here ? No difference . Enemies within must be eradicated !


Agreed.
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Postby TALISMAN » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:06 pm

Most certainly agreed
TALISMAN
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:13 am
Location: PAPHOS/NORTH SEA

Postby Oracle » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:49 pm

All I can see are parallels between what is now happening in the UK to what happened in Cyprus.

Indisputably, Britain is one of the most tolerant societies for foreign settlement. Ditto Cyprus. So, it's a great shame when that tolerance is stretched to breaking point and governments have to react with restrictions/amendments which affect the innocent as well as generating ill-feeling that freedom of Speech is being curtailed and drawing upon themselves condemnation about the handling of their internal (sovereign) problems ... criticism which has been heaped on Cyprus in the past also. Still continued by the likes of Miltiades who is quick to sympathise with the UK acting in the same way as Cyprus did a few years ago against the "memorial", but now strangely, unreservedly, supporting this action.

I think the best course of action would have been to let the group organise the symbolic march through Wootton Basset but still banned any subversive anti-Democracy organisations which spring up.

At the heart of all this is the clash between those who invade and take their baggage with them instead of integrating and leaving their ethnicity out of politics which undermine the more multicultural societies to which they chose to go to, and the liberal natives who are more interested in continued improvements in individual freedom and equality ...
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby miltiades » Sat Jan 16, 2010 2:58 pm

Oracle , quit talking nonsense . There is not one iota of similarity between a bunch of Islamist fanatics who have as their agenda the introduction of Sharia barbarity in the UK and the Cyprus memorial.
O, you have been caught with your pants down , I suggest you pull them up and start another thread .
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby Oracle » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:13 pm

miltiades wrote:Oracle , quit talking nonsense . There is not one iota of similarity between a bunch of Islamist fanatics who have as their agenda the introduction of Sharia barbarity in the UK and the Cyprus memorial.
O, you have been caught with your pants down , I suggest you pull them up and start another thread .


So, those "Brits+Telegraph" who raised funds to erect a "Memorial" against the authority of the RoC were not forcing their beliefs on another country?

Oh right, yeah, because the Islam4UK respected the UK's decision and did not hold the march ... whereas the "Brits" went ahead!

Islam4UK may be trying to introduce an illegal/undemocratic system of Sharia Law int he UK but those "Brits" are trading in illegally acquired GC properties or negotiating with the illegal lawless authorities in the occupied north! Just as bad!

If you cannot see the parallels it's because you cannot see straight.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby rigsby » Sat Jan 16, 2010 3:52 pm

The expats in the north are lowlifes agreed, cheapskates as Miltiades calls them and their day is coming but that does not make them terrorists,there are no parallels
rigsby
Member
Member
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:32 pm
Location: back of beyond

Postby miltiades » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:19 pm

Oracle wrote:
miltiades wrote:Oracle , quit talking nonsense . There is not one iota of similarity between a bunch of Islamist fanatics who have as their agenda the introduction of Sharia barbarity in the UK and the Cyprus memorial.
O, you have been caught with your pants down , I suggest you pull them up and start another thread .


So, those "Brits+Telegraph" who raised funds to erect a "Memorial" against the authority of the RoC were not forcing their beliefs on another country?

Oh right, yeah, because the Islam4UK respected the UK's decision and did not hold the march ... whereas the "Brits" went ahead!

Islam4UK may be trying to introduce an illegal/undemocratic system of Sharia Law int he UK but those "Brits" are trading in illegally acquired GC properties or negotiating with the illegal lawless authorities in the occupied north! Just as bad!

If you cannot see the parallels it's because you cannot see straight.

Oracle , xx :lol:
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby Oracle » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:39 pm

rigsby wrote:The expats in the north are lowlifes agreed, cheapskates as Miltiades calls them and their day is coming but that does not make them terrorists,there are no parallels


Parallels are not about running along the same one track.

If terrorism means fear of losing your home or way of life to lawless individuals (as the 200,000 GC refugees have); then, those "Brits", who lawlessly negotiate with illegal organisations in Cyprus (the Turkish Occupation Regime), by building "memorials" or purchasing the "spoils", thereby forming part of the chain gang, are no different to terrorists which would be banned in the UK .....
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest