bill cobbett wrote:Bir, can I ask you a question please? On this question of numbers? Let's remove ourselves from matters of CY where we have our entrenched positions.
Earlier this evening, and sure many here did same, was watching the appalling news on TV of the earthquake in Haiti with 50,000 poor people losing their lives, '000s terribly injured, 000,000s made homeless and short of food and water. By any standards a terrible, terrible disaster.
Elsewhere, in other disasters, the death toll, the suffering has been much smaller. For example, here in GB the snow and ice of the past three weeks has claimed the lives of some thirty people.
Which has led to the greatest amount of human suffering?
Bill, human suffering and loss is very subjective and emotional...
You cannot express it in numbers...You ,for example,would certainly be more affected if one of your loved-ones,say your wife or son or daughter,died (heaven forbid) suddenly one their way home tonight,than all the deads in Haiti combined....another person would probably suffer more by seeing their pet dog die in front of them than the news of all the dead in Haiti...Pain and loss is very personal...You can't tell someone who have lost a loved-one in any tragedy to take comfort in the fact that other's died somewhere else in the world and in greater numbers at the same time...That is how it is,we grieve for those we know and love...all other deaths we can have empathy with but would not affect us as much...don't you agree????