The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Flag of the Occupation ADMIN PLEASE NOTE

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby BirKibrisli » Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:37 am

Malapapa wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:Funilly enough, I am not hot on the TURKISH part of the TRNC name.


Why did your pal do that? All those years ago, do you think?


Good question.


I hope you ask him. Why do you think this was done? Surely he's not stupid.

Expatkiwi wrote:A UDI would logically have a name like "Republic of North Cyprus". ..


Yes. How illogical. I hope you can clear it up as any supporter of Turkish Cypriots and their freedom ought to be troubled by this, don't you think?


The answer is simple,MP..Rauf Denktash is one of the few remaining Turanists left in prominent positions...A Turanist ,in case you are not familiar,is one who believes in Pan-Turkic unification,ie,uniting all the Turkic people of the world under one great Turkish state....It is the dream of ultra-Turkish-nationalists like Denktash....Any state that Denktas found had to have the name Turkish in it...
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby DT. » Thu Jan 14, 2010 1:46 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:Funilly enough, I am not hot on the TURKISH part of the TRNC name.


Why did your pal do that? All those years ago, do you think?


Good question.


I hope you ask him. Why do you think this was done? Surely he's not stupid.

Expatkiwi wrote:A UDI would logically have a name like "Republic of North Cyprus". ..


Yes. How illogical. I hope you can clear it up as any supporter of Turkish Cypriots and their freedom ought to be troubled by this, don't you think?


The answer is simple,MP..Rauf Denktash is one of the few remaining Turanists left in prominent positions...A Turanist ,in case you are not familiar,is one who believes in Pan-Turkic unification,ie,uniting all the Turkic people of the world under one great Turkish state....It is the dream of ultra-Turkish-nationalists like Denktash....Any state that Denktas found had to have the name Turkish in it...


The other one is insan. Note his signature.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Kikapu » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:26 pm

Kikapu wrote:Really, Expat, really.??? Now, can you tell us what is it that the Confederate Flag represents and why the American Civil War was fought over, and once you have done that, then come back and tell us that the NAACP are bunch of "pricks".!


Expatkiwi wrote:You are so sadly misinformed, Kookapu.


Really, Expat, really.?? Well, let see if I am or not.!

Expatkiwi wrote:The Confederate Flag has two very diverse meanings: To one group of people, it represents Southern Heritage and Pride. To another, it represents racism.


Tell me Expat, just what is this "Southern Heritage and Pride" that the southerners would want to hang onto the Confederate Flag.??

Well, since you did not tell us other than a some sterile buzz word, I'll tell you. How about slavery for few centuries. How about slaves doing all the manual work in the plantations that each state was benefiting on the blood and sweat of the slaves. How about owning human beings like owning a dog who had to be obedient. How about the slaves not having any rights what so ever, that even a horse thief were hung, but lynching a black slave by any white man was acceptable, other than perhaps pay the slave owner the cost of the slave's worth. Perhaps it was the raping of the black female slaves at will, or do you think the blacks in the states having fair skin colour was based on inter marriages, just like Obama’s parents did 100 years after the abolishment of slavery. Are these the Southern Heritage and Pride you are talking about, Expat.??


Expatkiwi wrote:Now, the United States was founded upon compromise. It was the failure to compromise that led to the Civil War.


I see, a compromise that was breached that lead to the Civil War. What compromises, Expat.? So it had nothing to do with the fact that the United States was finally getting ready to abolish slavery and that the southern states did not want to give up on their slaves that formed their "Southern Heritage and Pride". After all, it's not everyday you can own another human being where you can strip them off all their dignity and rights and make them into slaves to be used & abused and raped at will. Was this not the reason why the southern states formed the Confederacy, even though it was an illegal act under the US constitution which brought about the American Civil War.??

Expatkiwi wrote:Now, the Confederate flag flying from the Southern States' capitol buildings was a knee-jerk reaction to the Civil Rights revolution of the 50's and 60's.


Yeah, all Racist Rednecks think it was a knee- jerk reaction. I mean, how dare those former "nigger" slaves tell us what to do in our own southern states that is full of Heritage & Pride.?

Expatkiwi wrote:So groups like the NAACP were right to demand its removal from the State Capitals' domes. But given that the majority of Southerners wanted the Confederate Flag to remain, it wasn't fair to them (you know: democracy), so the South Carolina legilature compromised and removed the flag from the Capital Dome, and instead transferred it to a Civil War Monument on the grounds of the capitol so that the Southern Heritage could be honored. However, the NAACP continued its boycott of South Carolina on the grounds that the Confederate Flag should NEVER be on public property.


You got some learning to do as to what Democracy really means, Expat, just like all the anti Democracy people here on the forum. Democracy and Majority rule is not absolute. In True Democracy minority groups also have a voice and rights and the NAACP exercised those rights through boycotts. They have exercised their democratic rights. They did not kill the Racists Rednecks to remove the Confederate Flag. Of course all Racist flags that represent Racism and Slavery should be off public buildings and property, because those places belong to all citizens, specially to the blacks who were forced to build those states as slaves.. If Democracy and Majority rule were to be absolute, then we would still have slavery today, don't you think.?

Expatkiwi wrote:This issue has polarized the population in South Carolina. The legislature tried to compromise, but the NAACP does not want to do that, and thus are continuing the state boycott. Now do you understand, you idiot?


So you think the NAACP should accept the Racist Confederate flag which you admitted yourself that represents Racism (to the blacks), just because those whites with the majority should have their way and expect harmony in that state when in fact it is the reminder of the good old days when they were the slave owners of the blacks and the days when black slaves had no rights and were owned like dogs. Not that the situation changed very much for the blacks since the abolishment of slavery in the 1860's, because the blacks were still "slaves" to the white man economically and politically for another 100+ years until the civil rights movement began in the 1960's. This is what the Racist Rednecks cry about as being unfair that their way of life had to change because of all these "niggers" that your own state of Arkansas is one of the most racists of all the southern states who still has the KKK's headquarters there.

So Expat, is this what you meant by when you said "Southern Hospitality and Pride" by any chance.? :lol:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Acikgoz » Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:06 pm

How about this for idea generation:

If the north had been for slavery & union, and the south had been for emancipation and separation, what would the moral argument look like?
User avatar
Acikgoz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Where all activities are embargoed

Postby Expatkiwi » Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:23 pm

I can't talk to you, Kikapu. You're as close-minded as the NAACP is. It's pretty sad, if not pathetic.
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby Tim Drayton » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:01 pm

Expatkiwi wrote:I can't talk to you, Kikapu. You're as close-minded as the NAACP is. It's pretty sad, if not pathetic.


Just a minute, friend! You are the one who supports the cause of partition in Cyprus because this, you believe, will benefit the Turkish Cypriots, whom you, with justification, consider to have been the "bullied underdogs" at one time.

Surely it is not hard to see that the blacks in the USA were at one time similarly "bullied underdogs", what with racial segregation, Jim Crow laws and the like, and continue to suffer discrimination in the USA even today, if facts like the disproportionate number of incarcerated blacks is taken into account. How come the fight of a group like the NAACP is not to your liking? You seem to be fond of supporting the struggle of the "underdogs" in a place thousands of miles away while pouring scorn on the struggle of other "underdogs" closer to home. How so?
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby Expatkiwi » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:52 pm

Tim Drayton wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:I can't talk to you, Kikapu. You're as close-minded as the NAACP is. It's pretty sad, if not pathetic.


Just a minute, friend! You are the one who supports the cause of partition in Cyprus because this, you believe, will benefit the Turkish Cypriots, whom you, with justification, consider to have been the "bullied underdogs" at one time.

Surely it is not hard to see that the blacks in the USA were at one time similarly "bullied underdogs", what with racial segregation, Jim Crow laws and the like, and continue to suffer discrimination in the USA even today, if facts like the disproportionate number of incarcerated blacks is taken into account. How come the fight of a group like the NAACP is not to your liking? You seem to be fond of supporting the struggle of the "underdogs" in a place thousands of miles away while pouring scorn on the struggle of other "underdogs" closer to home. How so?


The NAACP has advanced Civil Rights. On that, I do not dispute, or disagree. It's just that their "all-or-nothing" attitude towards the Confederate Flag - especially as that flag has broad support throughout the Southern U.S. - has ended up polarizing the issue. Had thay said: "Okay, we appreciate that people down here do see the flag as a matter of heritage, not hate, so let's work out a compromise", that would be one thing, but they are demanding that the flag be totally removed, despite it's majority support, without offering any alternatives. That is what disappoints me about the NAACP on this issue.
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby Kikapu » Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:10 pm

Expatkiwi wrote:I can't talk to you, Kikapu. You're as close-minded as the NAACP is. It's pretty sad, if not pathetic.


What's the matter, Expat, did you want us to believe your "Southern Hospitality and Pride" was all about Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Kentucky Fried Chicken, did you.?? :lol:

Get lost, clown.! :idea:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Expatkiwi » Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:23 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:I can't talk to you, Kikapu. You're as close-minded as the NAACP is. It's pretty sad, if not pathetic.


What's the matter, Expat, did you want us to believe your "Southern Hospitality and Pride" was all about Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Kentucky Fried Chicken, did you.?? :lol:

Get lost, clown.! :idea:


If you are too stupid to read and understand all of what I wrote, and only dump on parts, perhaps you chould practice what you preach and get lost yourself...
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby paliometoxo » Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:26 pm

exactly independant from the turks we need to be free f thema nd the wall that is put up to split our island.. and as we always have sent our invadores home this time will be no exeption..

you say he is narrow minded but you just listen to one side of the story and make your mind up and buy into the bs..

plus its not your concern what we do with our island you should be worried about your own country
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests