Piratis wrote:
I was not born in the 60s. [
I was using you to refer to GC
Piratis wrote:
Don't forget that until the 1800s you used us as slaves, which is way worst.
I was not born in the 1800s. Or did you use you to mean ottomans. There are no ottomans on Cyprus today. Anyway the ottomans did not use you as slaves.
Piratis wrote:
The problem is that when we sign an agreement, we don't put an expiration date on it. So do you think is fair for my grandchildren to live in a system that was made as a punishment because of that one decade in the 60s?
I do not want a system that is a punishment for that decade. I want a system that will make as small as possible the chance that what occured in that decade occurs again. I want this for me and your grandchildren.
Piratis wrote:
I am sure my grandchildren will not think so, and since the TCs of that time will naturaly not be willing to give up what will then be their legal right, where would this lead? To another conflict!
If we (TC) get rights to poltical equality and if we create a united cyprus based on this and if we live togeather in peace under such a system then we may chose to forgoe those rights as TC for the benefits of a single unitary Cyprus, without fear that what happend in 60s will happen again. Even if we do not, your grandchildren will still be living in a peacful undivided cyprus even if there are two component state within it, which surely must be better than pros0pect of them living in a cyprus like we have today?
Piratis wrote:
This is why transitional periods with pre-defined time are essential to get from 1 to 10. Otherwise we will never get to 10. (actually i doubt we can peacefuly even get to 2 without these pre defined transitional periods)
You have to make us believe that GC really want to live with us as just Cypriots and without prejudice. A pre set timetbale for the removal of rights you may give us now does not make me believe this. It makes me beleieve that you will wait to get a GC controlled Cyprus if that is necessary.
Piratis wrote:
Then why you said before that there was not even one chance in the million that you would agree for such thing???
Er where have I said this? Wasn't me that I recall.
Piratis wrote:
What I say is what my real aim is. Have you ever thought that the reason you don't like me is because I am way to straight?
I am not questioning your motives personally. What I am saying is that if you were a GC who really wanted a GC cyprus, controlled and run by GC alone, with no regard for TC and their wishes and needs that could easily be presented as a desire for a single united Cyprus. I have no means of knowing if a GC claiming to want a Cyprus where we are all eqaul really wants that or is using as good spin to achieve their real desire of a Cyprus controolled by GC alone. All I have if trust and confidence in GC as my guide. When they tell what happened in 60s does not matter this does not help my trust and cofidence. When they tell me my community has no right to any form of equality this does not help my trust and cofidence. When they tell me anything they did to me in the 60's is irrelevant in the face of what the opttomans did in 1571- 18xx this does not help my trust and confidence.
I have no problem with straight talking. I like straight talking. I also do not 'not like you'. I can disagree with you without disliking you. I do not know you well enough to dislike you (or not). If you were ever to accept to meet in person then maybe I could get to dislike you (or not). However that might make it harder for you to kill me when the times comes so you may remain a stranger (until that day) I guess.
Piratis wrote: However you seem to think trying to build confidence and trust without a guarantee beforehand that we will definately achieve level 10
Please, this is not what I said. What I said is:
Do you think they can help even slightly and give even one chance in the million that you would agree that there is no need to keep Cyprus partitioned (disguised or standard), and that all Cypriots can be equal individuals in one and only state without discrimination based on race?
Do you think there is even a slight chance to agree for this, even after long (but predefined) transitional periods so our grandchildren will be able to live in one united country without such kind of discriminations?
If the meetings can have even 1 millionth of a chance to help even slightly for this happening, then it worths it.
So I didn't ask for
guarantees. I asked for 1 chance in the million and this even after long transitional periods! If this is your aim too, then why you didn't agree that at least this 1 chance in the million exists?
My mistaike and appolgies for it. What I do not understand then is why you think that GC and TC working togeather to clean up cemetaries in disrepair does not even have one millionth chance of achieving a Cyprus that would be good for your grandchildren? Surely it has such a chance and certainly more chance that doing nothing but argue here round and round in circles?