we challenge anyone to reveal the doom & gloom they predict and to explain how it will come about
I challenge anyone to reveal the doom & gloom they predict and to explain how it will come about.
Bananiot wrote:That is exactly what morons (didn't say fascists) told us before 1974:we challenge anyone to reveal the doom & gloom they predict and to explain how it will come about
Tony-4497 wrote:I challenge anyone to reveal the doom & gloom they predict and to explain how it will come about.
So what you're saying is those who would like to "cement" the Annan-plan, like Christofias, should just go ahead and try it on, as no harm could come out of such an effort..
A second No (to a plan supported by the RoC president) would give the impression that GCs definitely reject ANY type of "re-unification" deal.
The response to this could range anywhere from near-recognition of the pirate state by non-important Islamic countries to direct trade of the former with EU countries (through unilateral decisions) - possibly even direct flights (the Brits may be able to work around the legal issues if they really, really want to).
This would also mean that future talks start at a much later stage - which would mean more and more settlers - unless the RoC finally wakes up and starts blocking Turkey's EU progress until she stops the flow of settlers, that is.
Get Real! wrote:Tony-4497 wrote:I challenge anyone to reveal the doom & gloom they predict and to explain how it will come about.
So what you're saying is those who would like to "cement" the Annan-plan, like Christofias, should just go ahead and try it on, as no harm could come out of such an effort..
A second No (to a plan supported by the RoC president) would give the impression that GCs definitely reject ANY type of "re-unification" deal.
The response to this could range anywhere from near-recognition of the pirate state by non-important Islamic countries to direct trade of the former with EU countries (through unilateral decisions) - possibly even direct flights (the Brits may be able to work around the legal issues if they really, really want to).
This would also mean that future talks start at a much later stage - which would mean more and more settlers - unless the RoC finally wakes up and starts blocking Turkey's EU progress until she stops the flow of settlers, that is.
No! What I’m saying is that only Cypriots can undermine UN-member Cyprus by foolishly falling for any of these Anglo-American plans that will most likely be hundreds if not thousands of pages long and inconspicuously include a clause or clauses that favor the enemy.
And of course, once the constitution of the RoC is signed away you can kiss the indigenous Cypriots on Cyprus goodbye!
Acikgoz wrote:Tali, good thought - "Do TCs expect to be within the EU should partition be finalised (or BBF for that matter)?"
BBF - of course as by implication 1 country.
Partition not mutually agreed - i.e. defacto recognised by some but not universally - unlikely. Expect a bit of Greece/Macedonia type wrangling.
Partition mutually agreed - yes.
Tony-4497 wrote:...the risk we are faced with is from arrogant politicians, who in their illusion that GCs will follow their lead into anything like sheep, may well take to referendum such a plan -
...the (certain) rejection of which will harm the RoC in one way or another..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest