Maybe for some, but certainly not for you.
Anyway, didn't you say you're in England studying or something? Learnt anything yet about a pluralistic culture where the bigotry you demonstrate daily on this forum is not tolerated in the 21st century.
Acikgoz wrote:Maybe for some, but certainly not for you.
Anyway, didn't you say you're in England studying or something? Learnt anything yet about a pluralistic culture where the bigotry you demonstrate daily on this forum is not tolerated in the 21st century.
Acikgoz wrote:Traitor to the Republic of Cyprus Constitution.
Acikgoz wrote:Who was that. Why do you tolerate yourself
Acikgoz wrote:- man get a book and learn something.
NICOSIA - President Christofias said on Friday that it was obvious the proposals submitted by Turkish Cypriot leader Mehmet Ali Talat concerning aspects of the Cyprus problem had been prepared in Ankara.
He then called on Turkey to ''see reason.''
Christofias also said he had sent the new proposals to the political parties, calling on them to study them carefully. They will be discussed on Sunday at an informal national council meeting.
Meanwhile, UN envoy Alexander Downer who is to meet Talat later on Friday, held a morning meeting with ruling Akel leader Andros Kyprianou.
“I try to catch up with the party leaders and it is an opportunity for us to talk about the Cyprus problem and the negotiations and we particularly focused on the negotiations that will be taking place next week and in an intensive phase. It has been very useful and I appreciate the meeting,” Downer told journalists.
Asked if Talat’s proposals were a step forward, Downer said ''it is not for me to comment on these proposals.''
''I conveyed the proposals to Mr. Christofias yesterday and I obviously the Greek Cypriot side will have a good look at these proposals and they will be discussed during the course of next week,'' he added.
Acikgoz wrote:It was a signed document by your leader. It was a legal document. He betrayed the constitution of Cyprus.
You harp on about law and then say the law doesn't really count in that situation. Let me help you with a fair argument, remember the one I was using yesterday, now apply it as I believe it does fit very well in this situation.
Critical Legal Studies is a younger theory of jurisprudence that has developed since the 1970s which is primarily a negative thesis that the law is largely contradictory and can be best analyzed as an expression of the policy goals of the dominant social group.
Are you finally getting the point, we all have the mirror images of the same bs. GCs don't have a monopoly on it neither do TCs.
I'm trying not to patronise but seriously it's like the light's not on, and I'm wondering if the bulbs broken or there's simply no wiring in the house. Looking for a spark, anything?
Acikgoz wrote:It was a signed document by your leader. It was a legal document. He betrayed the constitution of Cyprus.
Acikgoz wrote:You harp on about law and then say the law doesn't really count in that situation. Let me help you with a fair argument, remember the one I was using yesterday, now apply it as I believe it does fit very well in this situation.
Critical Legal Studies is a younger theory of jurisprudence that has developed since the 1970s which is primarily a negative thesis that the law is largely contradictory and can be best analyzed as an expression of the policy goals of the dominant social group.
Are you finally getting the point, we all have the mirror images of the same bs. GCs don't have a monopoly on it neither do TCs.
Acikgoz wrote:I'm trying not to patronise but seriously it's like the light's not on, and I'm wondering if the bulbs broken or there's simply no wiring in the house. Looking for a spark, anything?
Expatkiwi wrote:Acikgoz wrote:It was a signed document by your leader. It was a legal document. He betrayed the constitution of Cyprus.
You harp on about law and then say the law doesn't really count in that situation. Let me help you with a fair argument, remember the one I was using yesterday, now apply it as I believe it does fit very well in this situation.
Critical Legal Studies is a younger theory of jurisprudence that has developed since the 1970s which is primarily a negative thesis that the law is largely contradictory and can be best analyzed as an expression of the policy goals of the dominant social group.
Are you finally getting the point, we all have the mirror images of the same bs. GCs don't have a monopoly on it neither do TCs.
I'm trying not to patronise but seriously it's like the light's not on, and I'm wondering if the bulbs broken or there's simply no wiring in the house. Looking for a spark, anything?
There's no 'spark' because someone tore out the 'switch'...
Acikgoz wrote:Maybe for some, but certainly not for you.
Anyway, didn't you say you're in England studying or something? Learnt anything yet about a pluralistic culture where the bigotry you demonstrate daily on this forum is not tolerated in the 21st century.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests