Z4 wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:Toffee wrote:How can we get the smiley of "going over the head-whoosh!" on here??
Is it 'going over the head' or 'head in sand'?
Actually, you are probably right.
Z4's ad hominem attacks brand him as either extremely stupid or just another Internet troll... a shame really.
It is great to have a real debate about an important subject such as this and a shame when it is reduced to 'No' or 'cherryade'.
I've just taken my friend and his kids (1, 4½ and 6) back to the airport - you know, I'd hoped for a bit more intelligent banter than I've suffered for the past week but I'm not getting it from Z4.
If you want intelligent banter then start talking some sense please. You seem to believe that passive smoking is not bad, does not cause any dangers to non-smokers, you also believe that smokers have rights to smoke in public. You are wrong, they have had the right to smoke in public for many many years now and now it is the time for non smokers to enjoy clean air when out!
I have been talking sense for ages...
If you remember (I'll remind you just in case),
each and
every one of your ridiculous claims (like one
single inhalation of second hand smoke will cause damage to your health) have been met with proof to the contrary.
Your response is always 'I didn't bovver reading it'
Your one and only 'positive' argument is "I don't like it so it should be banned"
And when anybody points out the ridiculous effect that this will have on your liberty you simply resort to ad hominem attacks like 'Cyprusgrump drinks cherry aide'...
You are the one who has completely, utterly and totally failed over months and months to provide any sort of 'intelligent banter'.
Toffee is right - 'why are you here?'
Why not stick to 'football' or 'games' threads which match your intellectual level...?
Why try to post on threads where you are clearly out of your depth...?
My father taught me something many years ago which I still hold true - "if you have nothing to say, say nothing."
You should think about it...
