Viewpoint wrote:While agreeing to the removal of the TA what do you proposal for alternative security measures? obvioulsy you are also against Turkeys Greece and Uk guarantees, how do you suggest we find a compromise that will address everyone concerns? taking into account you want the army gone and I want valid security?
I'd be happy with a professional police force, supported and trained by other forces which deal with ethnically diverse populations, eg. the Metropolitan Police, supported by robust recruitment procedures to ensure representation and prevent discrimination, and a robust and independent police complaints authority, with teeth, to investigate and deal with issues that arrise.
Viewpoint wrote:Should we not apply the principles of the EU to all settlers north and south after 1974? or is your thinking just to get rid of Turks and no other nationality given citizenship to which we did not agree?
I do not agree with the principle that all "TRNC" citizens should become citizens of Cyprus and the EU as a matter of course. These are people that have entered EU territory illegally and should be dealt with in the same way as any such migrant, on a case by case basis. My preference is that they be offered financial inducements to return to Turkey, or if this proves difficult that they be accommodated by other EU countries as well as Cyprus, as their numbers compared to the rest of the population, and in particular TCs, are too large to be accommodated solely by the island of Cyprus. Perhaps those that stay would need to pass a Cypriot citizenship test and swear allegiance to Cyprus.
Viewpoint wrote:I agree here but we have ot be practical, with the tw state in place those who properties have not been utilized in each state should be returned immediately, those that have are given the option of either compensation or alternative exchanged land, the ideology that everyone will go back is a myth and will never happen its about time refugees realized they have been played by politicians and that the majority of refugees whos properties cannot be physically returned for whatever reason will have imo have to swallow the biggest pill and to soften the blow take it with a monetary hand shake.
If they are offered a monetary handshake which thy do not accept then they will still have a right to take legal recourse which cannot be taken away. Refugees don't have to realise anything. They have rights and, if they wish, they can and will secure those rights.
Viewpoint wrote:Who is to be the judge here? you say genuine as a means of escape to pound our concerns into the ground as no concerns at all therefore not having to address them while all your cocnerns according to you are all genuine, you cannot brush aside my concerns just because you do not want to deal with them, time you realized this.
No. Your concerns should not be addressed at the expense of other people's rights and freedoms. And if they are, people will challenge this, as is their right.
Viewpoint wrote:Ill let you address one of my biggest concerns which is power sharing, how will you solve the risk of TCs being brushed to one side by the GC numerical majority? What are your thoughts on a structure that will guarantee we will always have an effective say in our own future and not be left to the mercy of revenge seeking GCs?
I think you and others have discussed this issue at length and ad nauseum, and as far as I can gather you've yet to agree. I've nothing further to add to this debate, other than what's on offer should demonstably be no different to other power-sharing models as already operating in modern, western multi-ethnic societies such as Belgium or Switzerland.