This article appeared in Hürriyet. Now I do know that most of you think that the best use for Turkish newspapers are in the toilet (and not as reading material), but this article is worth looking at IMHO...
Hürriyet wrote:Crack in northern Cyprus gets deeper as Turkish side fine tunes
Thursday, December 24, 2009
FULYA ÖZERKAN
ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News
While the Turkish side works to fine tune its Cyprus strategy before January – when the Cypriot leaders will intensify negotiations to reach a solution in 2010 – open fault lines between the government and the presidency in the north are disrupting unity.
Turkish Cypriot Prime Minister Derviş Eroğlu, accompanied by his foreign minister, held talks Thursday with Turkish officials in Ankara. But Turkish Cypriot President Mehmet Ali Talat was absent in the talks, and he immediately returned to the island after a one-day trip to Istanbul on Wednesday, without a stopover in Ankara, leading to the speculation that the Turkish Cypriot leader refused Ankara’s invitation to attend the talks with Eroğlu.
“Turkish Prime Minister Mr. [Recep Tayyip] Erdoğan had proposed a three-way meeting during consultations with Mr. Talat, who suggested it would be more useful if Erdoğan first meets with Eroğlu and then with him. There was no refusal,” said a senior Turkish Cypriot official speaking with the Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review on the condition of anonymity.
The official said Talat would travel to Ankara in the near future for further talks and highlighted that Ankara and Nicosia were working in full harmony.
Although this was the situation with the invitation puzzle, it is no secret that there is a split between the Turkish Cypriot president and the government. After his election victory in April, the Eroğlu government backed the continuation of talks between Talat and Greek Cypriot President Dimitris Christofias but said reunification should be based on “two states” – a framework at odds with the federal model now being discussed by the Cypriot leaders.
“Discrepancies are quite normal, especially at election times,” said a senior Turkish Foreign Ministry official, referring to the upcoming presidential elections in northern Cyprus. “However, what matters is such discrepancies should not harm the main cause.”
The main cause is to find a settlement to the decades-old Cyprus dispute, which already has already complicated Turkey’s membership negotiations with the European Union. Turkey is rolling up its sleeves before the mid-April presidential elections in the north, fearing that a new hard-line Turkish Cypriot leader could make it difficult to find a solution. At present, pro-reunification Talat is representing Turkish Cypriots in negotiations with the island’s Greeks.
Britain: Bilateral disputes should not hold up EU talks
Britain is pushing hard to keep Turkish-EU talks on track. This week, in a written declaration obtained by the Daily News, London welcomed the opening of further chapters in Turkey-EU talks but said that bilateral issues should not hold up the accession process.
The declaration drew adverse reactions from the Greek Cypriot media and Greek Cypriot officials, who slammed it as a “provocative counter-declaration.” Some excerpts from the declaration are as follows:
· The accession process provides strong encouragement for political and economic reform, and it is in the EU’s strategic interest to keep up the momentum of this process on the basis of agreed principles and conditions. We therefore look forward to this momentum being maintained in 2010 and beyond.
· Furthermore, we welcome the prospect of opening accession negotiations with other candidates under the Spanish Presidency where conditions are met.
· To this end we recall the renewed consensus on enlargement, including the consolidation commitments and the importance of fair and rigorous conditionality. Candidates and potential candidates must fulfill the obligations and continue progress against the established conditions.
· Similarly we support the [EU] Commission’s Enlargement Strategy conclusion that bilateral issues should not hold up the accession process. As that conclusion sets out, bilateral disputes need to be resolved by the parties concerned, who have the responsibility to find solutions in a spirit of good neighborliness, bearing in mind the overall EU interests.