runaway wrote:Oracle wrote:They're all Turks already. Who are we kidding?
Who were they before? Costa Ricans?
Yup ... you're right, runaway!
Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Unfortunately Turkey has got what it wants. It needs no more and would not dare.
In the back of my mind something niggles me; the threat of a guerilla warfare to gain their losses. I hope my fears are groundless.
We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
Byron wrote:paliometoxo wrote:i dont think turkey would try invade again they would lose to much if they did..
The turks do not need to invade, they are thinking long term 50 to 100 years by then there will be no original turkish cypriots left just turks !!
Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Unfortunately Turkey has got what it wants. It needs no more and would not dare.
In the back of my mind something niggles me; the threat of a guerilla warfare to gain their losses. I hope my fears are groundless.
We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
observer wrote:Oracle wrote:We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
Can this be the same EU that 5 years ago was urging the GCs to accept the UN-brokered Anan Plan? I don't think that you would have any support for any military action having rejected that plan, whatever your reasons were.
YFred wrote:observer wrote:Oracle wrote:We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
Can this be the same EU that 5 years ago was urging the GCs to accept the UN-brokered Anan Plan? I don't think that you would have any support for any military action having rejected that plan, whatever your reasons were.
NOOOOOOOOO, how did the EU even think of it. They will now have to work another 35 years to get the next plan out which will be about 35% worse than the Annan plan. Back to square one each and every time.
Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:observer wrote:Oracle wrote:We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
Can this be the same EU that 5 years ago was urging the GCs to accept the UN-brokered Anan Plan? I don't think that you would have any support for any military action having rejected that plan, whatever your reasons were.
NOOOOOOOOO, how did the EU even think of it. They will now have to work another 35 years to get the next plan out which will be about 35% worse than the Annan plan. Back to square one each and every time.
Yes. You see that's where the mistake is made. If you offer people an unacceptable proposal they will, understandably, not accept.
And then, if you offer them an even worse proposal, they will, understandably, not accept again, in even greater numbers. Back, as you say, to square one.
Free Cypriots would prefer the status quo to Annan – or anything worse than Annan. At least they remain Cypriot. At least they remain free.
YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:observer wrote:Oracle wrote:We don't need to resort to "guerrilla warfare" ... We are in the EU and should have enormous manpower and resources available to us to free our country from the invader.
Can this be the same EU that 5 years ago was urging the GCs to accept the UN-brokered Anan Plan? I don't think that you would have any support for any military action having rejected that plan, whatever your reasons were.
NOOOOOOOOO, how did the EU even think of it. They will now have to work another 35 years to get the next plan out which will be about 35% worse than the Annan plan. Back to square one each and every time.
Yes. You see that's where the mistake is made. If you offer people an unacceptable proposal they will, understandably, not accept.
And then, if you offer them an even worse proposal, they will, understandably, not accept again, in even greater numbers. Back, as you say, to square one.
Free Cypriots would prefer the status quo to Annan – or anything worse than Annan. At least they remain Cypriot. At least they remain free.
Isn't that the theory of Diminishing Return.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests