denizaksulu wrote:YFred wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Piratis wrote:If this woman lives in the UK and she does not live or profit from illegally acquired property in the occupied part of Cyprus then she should be given her own property back immediately.
I believe that this part of the Cyprus Problem should be solved in the courts, in the ECHR if needed, so every Cypriot gets his own property back and is allowed to live in it and enjoy it in peace.
Some said that the Cyprus problem is political and not legal. I disagree. I believe that many aspects of the Cyprus problem are legal, and that solving these legal problems will also force a correct political solution that will not come at the expense of the legal, human or democratic rights of any Cypriot citizen.
There are many TCs that reside in the UK that have tried to cliam their properties in the GC south only to be turned away saying the bankrupt guardian will not pay out or return property until a solution have been found. Maybe Piratis you can explain to us how living in the south for 6 month proves people have not double dipped, dont the GCs have to work with the TCs to get informaiton from our land regsitry offices, how does this actually work? and dont you think it is discriminative as GC still cliam the island is one whole which they represent and exchanged land is null and void?
The RoC attitude on the property issue of UK residents is strictly controlled. They (the TCs have to prove that they have lived in the UK continually since before the events of 1974. You must show evidence of this (paid NI contributions ,salary slips -continuous). Some have tried and failed because they have 'lived' in Cyprus (even for short periods). Some have been 'double-dippers' as well. The RoC have ways to check the authentic cases as it has been proven in the past that fraudulent cases have appeared.
Do you support the GC stance on property? that TCs have to live in the south for 6 months in order to earn a right to claim their property through Gc courts???
I see no other choice under the circumstances. Allowing all TCs (those already resident in the North) the right to claim their properties in the south
would be a nightmare for the Legal RoC Land Registry. How do you suppose they would be able to cope with the 'double dipping'.
Defintely not; I do not support that they live in the RoC for 6 months. Perhaps it is their way of minimising 'double dipping', but then that does not make sense either. I think that rule is there to dam up the floodgates of TC claimants. The Land Registry cant cope as it is. You are aware of the backlog. BTW, I have also discovered my property rights on land I never knew existed (RoC Land Registry). The kochans awere still under the name of my greatgrandmother. Now they have reverted to me.
That says we assume you are guilty and this is what you have to do if you want to prove your innocence. First of all that is no proof of innocence and secondly it goes against any justice system. The GCs can't have it both ways.
Its plain and simple fruking wrong. Please excuse my french.
Yfred, when I do on-line banking, I have to prove who I am and what I am before any transaction can take place.
The RoC have to prevent fraud, as they will become unstuck.
That's because you are on line and all it takes is the password you offered. The two can't be compared. All they have to do is ask the UN to supply the info from the TRNC. Who has been given what. At least try to make an effort to help the tc who have not esdegered. It aint that diffuclt to do instead of the policy they have which should be illegal under any law.