bill cobbett wrote:At the risk of seeming to be out of step with my Fellow Fighters in the Struggle for National Liberation ....
This "double-dipping" matter is not of any relevance whatsoever unless we ourselves make the mistake of giving it significance. Whatever happens in the Occupied North with the dodgy kochans has no legal weight to the extent that transfers have never ever taken place, in the real legitimate world, but we run the risk of giving this crappy exchange system value just by bringing it up in the same debate on legitimate tissy title land in the Free Areas. So please consider stopping comparing halloumi with chalk.
Please also consider that those who make a connection between the two may be falling into a possible trap set by Tnucland and the Appeasing Partitionists which will come back to bite us.
Excellent post Bill for the firt time we agree on something but the GC hypocritical mindset is nothing new to us on the one hand they say the exchanges are invalid and on the other hand they force people to live south of the border to prove they have not double dipped which they say does exsist, how does that actually work? its a denial of rights and this will be a great case to prove that GCs are wrong and will have to hand back property without the 6 month clause prior to a solution as there are also thousands of TCs like myslef who will follow the same path when the current talks fail. WHy do you think the GCs are scrambling to settle out of court if they felt she didnt stand a chance they would let it go to the ECHR.
