The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Look at these scumbags?

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby bill cobbett » Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:51 pm

Raymanoff wrote:Eh Asixtir re pushto EgglezoKiprei...isaste gari gamoto... mono parapona akuo, plironno potzi, plironno poda... :D en gamieste? Double taxation treaty...meaning, u dont have to pay there...neither here lol :D


Parabona? I'll give you something to have a moan about reh vodka drinking rosso... and, despite the genes, am not a kipreo, am a polite English gentleman. Honest. :lol:
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby SKI-preo » Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:56 pm

I'm with Ray. What is it with all these bloody whining Poms. Let them have their money- can you do their job? No then shut up and pay or study hard and become a banker
User avatar
SKI-preo
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1361
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:17 am
Location: New Zealand/Australia

Postby DT. » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:04 am

If one person brings in 3-4 million of revenue for the business they deserve the f*****ing bonuses. When all this talent moves to Frankfurt or New York and London becomes Leeds you won't be any happier.

That single square mile in the city brings in more income for the UK than Manchester, Liverpool and the entire Midlands put together.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Z4 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:12 am

DT. wrote:If one person brings in 3-4 million of revenue for the business they deserve the f*****ing bonuses. When all this talent moves to Frankfurt or New York and London becomes Leeds you won't be any happier.

That single square mile in the city brings in more income for the UK than Manchester, Liverpool and the entire Midlands put together.


If THEY are THAT good WHY did WE have to bail them phuckers out then?
User avatar
Z4
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4770
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Pissouri........of course!

Postby DT. » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:20 am

Z4 wrote:
DT. wrote:If one person brings in 3-4 million of revenue for the business they deserve the f*****ing bonuses. When all this talent moves to Frankfurt or New York and London becomes Leeds you won't be any happier.

That single square mile in the city brings in more income for the UK than Manchester, Liverpool and the entire Midlands put together.


If THEY are THAT good WHY did WE have to bail them phuckers out then?


While they were earning billions for their companies and the country all these years, through paying billions in taxes, why didn't you have a problem with them then? Its been a 20 year bull market and the govt's made 40% of everything they made throughout all these years.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Z4 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:31 am

DT. wrote:
Z4 wrote:
DT. wrote:If one person brings in 3-4 million of revenue for the business they deserve the f*****ing bonuses. When all this talent moves to Frankfurt or New York and London becomes Leeds you won't be any happier.

That single square mile in the city brings in more income for the UK than Manchester, Liverpool and the entire Midlands put together.


If THEY are THAT good WHY did WE have to bail them phuckers out then?


While they were earning billions for their companies and the country all these years, through paying billions in taxes, why didn't you have a problem with them then? Its been a 20 year bull market and the govt's made 40% of everything they made throughout all these years.


Why did they nearly go bankrupt then? Please tell me.

Greedy greedy scumbags.

Why didn't I have a problem because they were a business then and not public sector. The bank bail out has cost UK over £850 Billion!
User avatar
Z4
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4770
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Pissouri........of course!

Postby Z4 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:34 am

Barclays and HSBC can pay what they like because they are not public owned. Why should they get these obscence amount of bonuses when they helped phuck things up in the first place?

My taxes will probably increase to pay for these phuckers yahts, posh cars it bloody sucks
User avatar
Z4
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4770
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Pissouri........of course!

Postby Z4 » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:34 am

If it wasn't for the public they would have been jobless and now they are taking the urine
User avatar
Z4
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4770
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 9:53 pm
Location: Pissouri........of course!

Postby DT. » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:38 am

Z4 wrote:
DT. wrote:
Z4 wrote:
DT. wrote:If one person brings in 3-4 million of revenue for the business they deserve the f*****ing bonuses. When all this talent moves to Frankfurt or New York and London becomes Leeds you won't be any happier.

That single square mile in the city brings in more income for the UK than Manchester, Liverpool and the entire Midlands put together.


If THEY are THAT good WHY did WE have to bail them phuckers out then?


While they were earning billions for their companies and the country all these years, through paying billions in taxes, why didn't you have a problem with them then? Its been a 20 year bull market and the govt's made 40% of everything they made throughout all these years.


Why did they nearly go bankrupt then? Please tell me.

Greedy greedy scumbags.

Why didn't I have a problem because they were a business then and not public sector. The bank bail out has cost UK over £850 Billion!


So what the preference shares the govt got and the prices in which it got them at has made them more money than ever. the FTSE went from a low of 3500 this year to 5300 now. Thats quite a profit for the govts and the tax payer.

You should be thanking these people.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:51 am

The GB tax-payer bailed out this bank a year ago and owns 70% of this bank which will increase to some 85% early next year as more tax-payers' money is pumped in.

There were conditions attached to this money one, an end to dodgy lending and an end to excessive bonuses. The RBS is trying it on with a return to the bonus culture based on the easily available billions and billions of money eased in to the money markets by all the world's governments. Any money peddlar could have made money under these conditions.

It could do what Barclays, which has not had a penny of tax-payers' money, has done, which is to move more towards salary based rewards.

The encouragement of unsustainable, short-term profits and excesive risk-taking, brought about, partly, by these excessive bonuses, is what got us in to this mess.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests