The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


LEADERS AGREE TO INTENSIFY TALKS

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby zan » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:51 pm

B25 wrote:
zan wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:The EU UN UK Greece and many others backed the AP it was just not me, if whats necessary for TCs to trust GCs is something liek the AP then that only goes to show the chasm that exsists and cannot be bridged.


You don't see them backing it any longer do you, assuming they really backed it fully in the first place, or what it planned that way just to get Cyprus into the EU club knowing full well that the GCs would say OXI for sure considering how lopsided the whole plan was. Personally the TCs and Turkey fell into the trap of being allowed to make the AP as Undemocratic as possible with as many Human Rights violations as possible, just because they thought they were onto a good thing. We bought the "Pie in the Sky" dream for sure while Cyprus sneaked into the EU while we were dreaming of official partition, because the thought was all along, if the GCs said YES to the AP, the game was over for them, and it would have been.!

Maybe this one then......How many TCs were involved in the writing of the AP Kiks???? Sure they asked what we thought but who were the 100+ lawyers that worked on the plan????


well you should be grateful you miserable git, given you weren't asked, you were still going to gifted the Island, so whats your beef??

You couldn't have negotiated a better deal other than have all the GCs lined up and shot, just so that you don't have to worry about us.

The Ankara Plan was a pile of shit you know it, I know it, the world knows it, what more do you want??

And in any case it is 'null and void and dead and buried' why do you have to keep bringing it up??? Simple answer, it gave you so much of Cyprus you are afraid you won't get another chance to shaft us. That's why you so badly want it back.

well you know what you and your likes can do, right?


What are you shouting at me for DT :? You agree that your people made up the plan but scream at me......Go see them.....Perhaps they have seen the error of their ways and decided to be fair, for a change.......Who knows!!
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby B25 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 8:56 pm

zan, you are dreaming the flu jab has caused your brain to seize up.

DT is NOT B25.

DT is too smart and too rich to be me :lol: :lol:

Oh and he supports APOEL :wink: Where as I couldn't really give a rats about football.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby zan » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:01 pm

B25 wrote:zan, you are dreaming the flu jab has caused your brain to seize up.

DT is NOT B25.

DT is too smart and too rich to be me :lol: :lol:

Oh and he supports APOEL :wink: Where as I couldn't really give a rats about football.


Opppps! :oops: A Freudian slip (As they say). I had promised myself that I would argue with the person and not, the different nicks that they feel they have to create in order to say what they really feel. My apologies D.....B25.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Kikapu » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:01 pm

Kikapu wrote:
zan wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:The EU UN UK Greece and many others backed the AP it was just not me, if whats necessary for TCs to trust GCs is something liek the AP then that only goes to show the chasm that exsists and cannot be bridged.


You don't see them backing it any longer do you, assuming they really backed it fully in the first place, or what it planned that way just to get Cyprus into the EU club knowing full well that the GCs would say OXI for sure considering how lopsided the whole plan was. Personally the TCs and Turkey fell into the trap of being allowed to make the AP as Undemocratic as possible with as many Human Rights violations as possible, just because they thought they were onto a good thing. We bought the "Pie in the Sky" dream for sure while Cyprus sneaked into the EU while we were dreaming of official partition, because the thought was all along, if the GCs said YES to the AP, the game was over for them, and it would have been.!

Maybe this one then......How many TCs were involved in the writing of the AP Kiks???? Sure they asked what we thought but who were the 100+ lawyers that worked on the plan????


I'm just answering VP's question, Zan. He thinks that the world is supporting the AP. Well, where are they today, other than Turkey and the NeoPartitionist.?


zan wrote:First of all......You made the staement that we biased the AP....Prove it and tell me you know who was involved in its final draft..


We could have said "Err no thanks on the parts where Violations of others Democratic, Human Rights, International laws and EU Principles would be violated as well as lets not deny the GCs to be able to pass on their properties to their heirs, require them to speak Turkish for state jobs, deny them to vote in the north state and also asking them to give their allegiance to Atatürk if they should speak Turkish and work for the state. But NO, we said we take the above thank you very much. If we didn't ask for them, who gave them to us, the GCs, and if it was the GCs, then we were more stupid to have fallen for that trap than I could have ever imagined.

zan wrote:Secondly.....What plan do you think is being revised for the present agreement?? Yours? :lol:


Lets wait and see.! :wink:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby zan » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:08 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
zan wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:The EU UN UK Greece and many others backed the AP it was just not me, if whats necessary for TCs to trust GCs is something liek the AP then that only goes to show the chasm that exsists and cannot be bridged.


You don't see them backing it any longer do you, assuming they really backed it fully in the first place, or what it planned that way just to get Cyprus into the EU club knowing full well that the GCs would say OXI for sure considering how lopsided the whole plan was. Personally the TCs and Turkey fell into the trap of being allowed to make the AP as Undemocratic as possible with as many Human Rights violations as possible, just because they thought they were onto a good thing. We bought the "Pie in the Sky" dream for sure while Cyprus sneaked into the EU while we were dreaming of official partition, because the thought was all along, if the GCs said YES to the AP, the game was over for them, and it would have been.!

Maybe this one then......How many TCs were involved in the writing of the AP Kiks???? Sure they asked what we thought but who were the 100+ lawyers that worked on the plan????


I'm just answering VP's question, Zan. He thinks that the world is supporting the AP. Well, where are they today, other than Turkey and the NeoPartitionist.?


zan wrote:First of all......You made the staement that we biased the AP....Prove it and tell me you know who was involved in its final draft..


We could have said "Err no thanks on the parts where Violations of others Democratic, Human Rights, International laws and EU Principles would be violated as well as lets not deny the GCs to be able to pass on their properties to their heirs, require them to speak Turkish for state jobs, deny them to vote in the north state and also asking them to give their allegiance to Atatürk if they should speak Turkish and work for the state. But NO, we said we take the above thank you very much. If we didn't ask for them, who gave them to us, the GCs, and if it was the GCs, then we were more stupid to have fallen for that trap than I could have ever imagined.

zan wrote:Secondly.....What plan do you think is being revised for the present agreement?? Yours? :lol:


Lets wait and see.! :wink:




I don't suppose you would go down the line that they made the best of what they had to play with??? You know...The common sense route instead of the " Mad Mad Great Greek Sale" that you like to subscribe to.


Now if I were sceptical, then I might say that they gave it away because they knew that they were going to say OXI anyway and it was designed to make the TCs look bed (Just the way you like it)....It backfired in a big way 8) 8)


What you should be doing is catching up with reality and the here and now Kiks......So far...I can see all EU directives have been ignored and the AP the template on which present talks are based. I went to both Pesident Talats talks in the UK of late, and he did not mention your proposal once. :wink:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Oracle » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:27 pm

B25 wrote:zan, you are dreaming the flu jab has caused your brain to seize up.

DT is NOT B25.

DT is too smart and too rich to be me :lol: :lol:

Oh and he supports APOEL :wink: Where as I couldn't really give a rats about football.


Don't be intimidated by Zan' methods. He did the same to me trying to make out I was GR! when I first arrived and I stopped posting I was so sick of his insinuations.

Ignore him because it is only that he puffs up as different persona that he thinks everybody else does.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Hermes » Sun Dec 13, 2009 9:31 pm

zan wrote:
First of all......You made the staement that we biased the AP....Prove it and tell me you know who was involved in its final draft.


The historical records show that the Annan Plan was drawn up by American emissaries along with the British delegation headed by David Hannay in consultation with the Turkish Premier. In fact, a fourth edition of the UN plan was adjusted to meet Turkish demands, and a final, non-negotiable version – Annan V – was announced on the last day of March 2004. A jubilant Erdogan told his people that it was the greatest victory of Turkish diplomacy since the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, sealing Kemal’s military triumph over Greece.

The fundamental drive behind the plan, in all its versions, was the fear that if Cyprus were admitted to the EU without being taken apart beforehand, it could veto the entry of Turkey into the Union until Turkey relinquished its grip – soldiers and settlers – on the island. The bottom line of Hannay’s calculations was thus always what would be acceptable to Ankara, helping it to seek membership of the EU without provoking public opinion or the ‘deep state’ in Turkey.

Unsurprisingly, the plan was overwhelmingly rejected by Greek Cypriots. Cyprus joined the EU, the Annan Plan was buried and Turkey is at the negotiating table still seeking entry into the EU. This time, hopefully, a settlement will be based on the needs of the Cypriot people and not the Turkish state and its backers. We shall see...
User avatar
Hermes
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2837
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:55 pm
Location: Mount Olympus

Postby Viewpoint » Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:35 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Your plan was rejected becuase it was camaflouged by you to put TCs and the North state at risk. With proportional representation in the lower house giving GCs control our only auto control was the upper house where the ratio was 5 from south state and 5 from north state but where it was flawed was allowing the advantage of the GC using their numerical advantage to swing just 1 seat in the north state in their favor to take control of power all over the island, therefore having sussed you treacherous plan to place us at risk I rejected your plan.

There has to be inbuilt system that will not allow such a sitatuation putting either state at risk, therefore leaving them out of the equation.


There was nothing at all camouflaged. What was very clear why you rejected such a plan was because you did not want to give 50% of the north to become part of the south state as well as not being able to close the government down to cause a constitutional crisis to create an atmosphere for partition. I had also told you many times, that what ever decision is made by the lower and upper house effects all citizens equally and that it is within each state where 99% laws are made by the majority is what applies to that state and its citizens, as long as they did not violate the Federal Constitution which may effect the rights of any citizen in that state.

Here is part of a post I wrote on "Kikapu's "BBF" power sharing Plan" that you did not respond to which with a slight derogation from the EU and an agreement by the GCs, even your above concerns on the 5 seats for the upper house could be protected by keeping the north to remain majority TCs..

Kikapu wrote:Let me also add, that I have also stated in this thread, that if we are going to ask for derogations from the EU to help the TCs maintain power in the upper house through undemocratic means such as allocating those 5 seats to them rather then being voted on, is to put a limit on how many non TC citizens can move into the "TC state", other than the original 30,000 GC refugees whose land will remain in the north based on the north being at 18-20%. Basically what that would mean is, if most of the TCs were to move into the north state (20%), their numbers will be around 130,000-150,000, which would include the 50,000 settlers given Cypriot citizenships. With the potential of more TCs coming from abroad in the first 5 years to settle in the north under my 5 year plan “stocking up” phase, the TCs numbers can go up to 180,000+ versus the original 30,000 GC refugees rights to live in the north with all their democratic and constitutional rights protected. You can then have a system set up after the 1st 5 years where the number of GCs can only increase in the north at the same numbers as the increases occurring in the TCs numbers. This way, the TCs will always remain the majority in the north and I doubt very much we will ever violate anyone’s Human Rights of any non TCs citizens not being allowed to move to the north if they wanted to in practice. At worse case scenario, they will be put on a waiting list to move to the north if in fact the quotas for that particular year has been reached. This “Human Rights” violation on Cypriot citizens will ONLY be in theoretically and not in actuality, because I do not expect “3,600” GCs moving to the north annually.

For example, if the population of 180,000 TCs were to grow by 2% annually in the north state, that would mean an additional 3,600 more TCs in the north. This would mean an additional 3,600 non TC Cypriot citizens can settle into the north also from the south or from abroad. Just by using simple calculations or even compounded calculations, the TCs will always maintain their original majority numbers of 150,000+ in the north as the case was from day one, and most likely, they will be more than that if the non TCs citizens do not move to the north at maximum quotas for each year. The ratio difference between the TCs and all other Cypriots living in the north will narrow eventually however, if and when “new Cypriot” citizens move to the north at the same numbers increase by the TCs at 3,600. The TCs will set the pace at all times. If agreed by all parties, and the GCs agree to have their population ONLY grow at 2% also in the north state, then the TCs number will grow at much faster pace than the GCs ever will. It all depends how much the GCs will get their own land back from the north to be so accommodating to the TCs. They will for sure not agree to such measures if most of their land is kept to become part of the north state, in which case, they will use all means to increase their numbers in the north eventually. Now, if the majority of the TCs who chooses to move to the south or abroad eventually to seek better paying jobs as Nikitas predicts or move to their own land pre 1974, then their numbers in the north will be reduced drastically over time and the 30,000+ GC refugees may in time outpace the TCs with natural increases through births. This is something the TCs will have to think as to what is more important to them, better paying jobs in the south or who is sitting in the upper house’s 5 seats. My guess is, people will move where they can better their lives if they can and not be too bothered about who is occupying those 5 seats, because every citizen will still have their democratic, Human Rights and individual rights protected by the Federal constitution as well as the state constitution. It will not matter who is occupying those seats, because in True Democracy, those political seats are not guaranteed to any ethnic groups, but only the democratic process can be guaranteed to allow everyone the right to vote and run for office.

In any case, we are getting ahead of ourselves in regarding the ethnic lines, because within 20 years or so, we will be all voting under a political ideology and not along ethnic divisions, which will further show, that it will not make any difference who will occupy those seats, a GC or a TC, because what would matter the most, is what will be their political ideology is and not their ethnicity, as the case is in the USA. I had asked VP several times in the past to tell us his biggest concerns as to how the TC would be effected negatively if any of the upper house's 5 seats were to be won by a non TC citizen in the north state, VP could only come up with the Federal government stopping the Gambling and Whorehouses or stopping trade with Turkeys. All of the above concerns VP gave us tells me that the 5 seats are not worth as much as VP makes them out to be, because 99% of all the laws that will effect the individual states and it's citizens, are laws passed within those states and not by the Federal government. Any laws passed by the Federal government will effect all citizens, regardless where they may live and not adversely effect one ethnic group over another.


http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.p ... &start=260


Please answerthe following question honestly if you can and without deviating from the point, can the GC take the 1 seat necessary to gain total power in the upper house whether the north state is 18% or 29%...yes or no will do.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Viewpoint » Sun Dec 13, 2009 10:45 pm

Kikapu wrote:
zan wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:The EU UN UK Greece and many others backed the AP it was just not me, if whats necessary for TCs to trust GCs is something liek the AP then that only goes to show the chasm that exsists and cannot be bridged.


You don't see them backing it any longer do you, assuming they really backed it fully in the first place, or what it planned that way just to get Cyprus into the EU club knowing full well that the GCs would say OXI for sure considering how lopsided the whole plan was. Personally the TCs and Turkey fell into the trap of being allowed to make the AP as Undemocratic as possible with as many Human Rights violations as possible, just because they thought they were onto a good thing. We bought the "Pie in the Sky" dream for sure while Cyprus sneaked into the EU while we were dreaming of official partition, because the thought was all along, if the GCs said YES to the AP, the game was over for them, and it would have been.!

Maybe this one then......How many TCs were involved in the writing of the AP Kiks???? Sure they asked what we thought but who were the 100+ lawyers that worked on the plan????


I'm just answering VP's question, Zan. He thinks that the world is supporting the AP. Well, where are they today, other than Turkey and the NeoPartitionist.?


Again you have missed the point the only way to bridge the chasm of mistrust is with something like the AP (which will be rehashed allbeit with amendments) which you totally reject. So this mistrust and need for safe guards and guarantees as provided in the AP will not just disappear becuase the GCs want them to, the EU UN Greece Turkey clearly and fully supported just a solution and no one will just cancel the whole plan, parts will be amended but the hard work that went into the AP to provide the main structure will be back, just labelled differently.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Hermes » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:37 pm

Viewpoint wrote:So this mistrust and need for safe guards and guarantees as provided in the AP will not just disappear becuase the GCs want them to, the EU UN Greece Turkey clearly and fully supported just a solution and no one will just cancel the whole plan, parts will be amended but the hard work that went into the AP to provide the main structure will be back, just labelled differently.


Time has moved on since 2004. The purpose of the Annan Plan was to allow Turkey to enter EU negotiations unhindered by the threat of a Cyprus veto. That was dependent on a Greek Cypriot "yes" vote. It never happened. As a result, the Annan Plan was killed off in 2004 and Cyprus entered the EU anyway.

Since the Annan Plan was devised we have further legal precedent in the European Courts as well as the Lisbon Treaty which enshrines EU law. Cyprus now as an EU member cannot accept a solution which violates the EU charter or EU law. As a result, all aspects of the Annan Plan which violated human rights and legalised the Turkish occupation are dead and buried. To all intents and purposes the Annan Plan as it favoured Turkey is also dead and buried.

The question for Turkey is whether it can accept a federal Cyprus united under the EU, subject to EU law and the acquis communitaire. Of course the Turks are stubbornly resisting but the outline of a solution is no longer determined by Turkey's needs but those of the Cypriots. That is as it should be...
User avatar
Hermes
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2837
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:55 pm
Location: Mount Olympus

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests