BirKibrisli wrote:Piratis wrote:BirKibrisli wrote:The exchange between Piratis and Viewpoint illustrates once again why we are never going to find an agreed solution...Stripped down Piratis is saying "You were the aggressors in 1571 and ever since...GCs has suffered more and for longer than the TCs,so dont look for any sympathy or understanding from us.It is majority rule or nothing!"And VP is saying "You will always blame us for the original sin,will never appreciate our pain and sufering,so we cannot ever trust you...It is partition of nothing..." Never the twine shall meet!!! or whatever the saying is...
And stripped down what you are saying is: "Bent over and let the Turks violate your human and democratic rights yet again" you call this "sympathy and understanding"
and you think that it is the "solution" of the Cyprus Problem.
Also you got wrong what I am saying. For me what happened in the past is important only for factual reasons and I talk about the past
only when somebody tries to falsify our history in order to excuse yet more crimes against us. On the contrary, I do
not support that even a single of TCs human rights should be violated, regardless of what they did to us in the past and they continue doing against us as we speak. Unfortunately you miss this point.
What happened in the past is important,Piratis,but not only for factual reasons...It is also important for our undestanding now of why the TCs cannot bring themselves to trust the GCs...I know that you and plenty of others here,are finding it extremely difficult to even acknowledge that the TCs had a terrible time during the 63-74 period,and not so good time before that during the 50s...Your attitude seems to be: nobody asked you to come to Cyprus in 1571,so you deserve all you've got...Blaming the TCs today for the Ottoman capture of Cyprus over 500 years ago is absurd to say the least...That is what empires did those days..They invaded and captured all they could...Nobody asked my ancestors back in those days if they wanted to move to Cyprus. They came either as soldiers,or as forcefully expatriated settlers...Over the centuries they mixed and matched with the original inhabitants and evolved into the Cypriots they are today...So please stop harping on about 1571,and try to focus on the events/facts of 1945-74...See if you can manage to come up with one thing that the GCs could ahve done differently to avoid the catastrophy which engulfed our beautiful motherland... The key to the TC mindset represented by Viewpoint is there...By refusing to see it you are not helping find a solution most people might be happy to live with...
Bir, you used to be objective, unfortunately not anymore.
You say that TC can not trust the GCs because of what happened in the past. Do you think that based on what happened in the past the GCs can trust the TCs?
We don't even need to go to the Ottoman rule which lasted until 1878 (1571 was just the begging), although it was not
that long ago as you claim, my great grandparents were alive back then. I don't understand why you want to start history in 1945, not even my parents were alive at that time, and how 1945 is relevant but a few decades earlier (1878) is not. Don't forget that the people who were alive in 1945 either suffered themselves during Ottoman rule, or their parents had suffered during Ottoman rule. If TCs today can claim that they can not trust GCs due to events that happened in the 50s and the 60s, even though most of them were not even born back then, then surely the same excuse can be given to the GCs in the 40s or 50s, since themselves or their parents had suffered under Turkish rule. History is a
chain of events. One part of the chain is always affected by the one before it. If we assume that the previous step is relevant, then so is the one before it and so on and so forth.
But I will go along with your request and start history in 1945. Do you think that TCs didn't commit crimes since 1945? Didn't they collaborate with the colonialists in the 50s? Didn't the form TMT and started to kill innocent GCs starting the inter-communal conflict? Didn't they collaborate with the Turkish army killing innocent GCs in 1974? And since then and until
today, don't they illegally occupy our lands, selling them to foreigners and are quick to shoot or beat to death innocent unarmed GCs who demonstrate against their crimes?
I think the obvious answer is that GCs can not trust the TCs either.
So now answer this question: If a GC said that he can not trust the TCs and for this reason the solution of the Cyprus Problem should be the removal of TCs from Cyprus, in the same way that the Germans were removed from Czechoslovakia after WWII in order to remove from Germany the excuse of invading Czechoslovakia again in order to "protect" their minority, would you find the argument of this GC reasonable?
I am sure you would not Bir. And this is why I said that you are not objective any more. You find reasonable the "argument" of the extremist TCs who use the past and the mistrust as an excuse to ethnically cleanse us and violate our human rights, but surely you would not support an
equivalent position from a GC that would use the past and the mistrust as an excuse to support the ethnic cleansing and human rights violations against TCs.
What I support is that the past should
not be used as an excuse for crimes and human rights violations. You should not be punished for what your ancestors have done against mine, and I should not be punished for what my ancestors have done against yours. I am even willing to forgive the crimes that are committed against us
today. Excusing more human rights violations against Cypriots based on some one sided view of the past is
not a solution, but on the contrary is the recipe for perpetuating the Cyprus Problem and creating more division, hate and conflicts.
But if
YOU (and I emphasize that) want to go to the past in order to appropriate blame and excuse yet more human rights violations, then I have every right to present the whole historical truth so at least the blame appropriation (which you want) will be done
correctly.