Cyprus-Forum.com

[bill cobbett]

bill, that is not the case because Turkey does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICJ as compulsory. (Cyprus does)

http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/ind ... &p2=1&p3=3

In order for one country to bring another country to the ICJ without a prior agreement between the two countries, both countries must accept the jurisdiction of the ICJ as compulsory.

More details on where the court has jurisdiction can be found here:

http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/ind ... &p2=1&p3=2

If we could take Turkey to the ICJ maybe we would. However it is already established that the Turkish occupation and the "trnc" are illegal, so there is no need for us to prove again what is already proven and obvious to all (except to the Turks).

Turkey ignores the UN Resolutions and in the same way she would ignore the ICJ rulings. Don't expect that those fascists will ever respect any international law if it doesn't suit them and if they are not forced to obey them. It would be like expecting Hitler to stop invading and occupying other countries by winning a court case against him. Those fascists have no regards to international law and this is something already established.

Piratis, in the light of the undeniable info from your link, must regretfully concede.

[DT.]

"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

Orams piglets....mmmmmmmm

[bill cobbett]

"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

Orams piglets....mmmmmmmm

Oh dear. Could be burnt piglets in time for Xmas.

[Kikapu]

I wouldn't need to leave the TRNC to get a loan using them as collateral.

"Wanna know if we can?"
I couldn't give a flying-fuck, actually.

Don't think you WILL be able to leave the "trnc" in a few years time mate. Once that judgement against you is made in the UK you're gonna have to start holidaying in Thailand with the ladyboys again.

If I wanted to holiday with the "ladyboys" I wouldn't need to go much further than RoC.

Speaking of "Ladyboys", I don't think you have this in the RoC.................Simon Cabaret, like the one in Phuket, which is one of the best shows in the country.!!

Some of you men wished your wives and girlfriends were such lookers with a body to go with it.!!!!

http://www.phuket.com/magazine4/focus.htm

[vaughanwilliams]

Hear, hear.

That's a typical c44 junk response we don't use here.

You're expected to add/expand/analyze/criticize, etc, or say nothing.

CopperLine has a clear unemotional grip on the presentation of his case. I could not possibly presume to add to what he has to say, but can only agree with its sentiments.

Malatya is the name the Turks gave to the exclusively Greek Cypriot village called Παλαιόσοφος (Paleosofos). Do you live in an illegally acquired Greek Cypriot property vaughanwilliams?

I live in a perfectly legally acquired house, according to the laws of the de facto government of the TRNC. If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity. :)

de fac·to (d fkt, d)

adj.
1. Actual: de facto segregation.
2. Exercising power or serving a function without being legally or officially established: a de facto government; a de facto nuclear storage facility.

Well thats alright then you bloody thief trust me your time will come

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

How about we take it up in the European courts as we do not recognise your de facto goverment like the rest of the world does not recognise it you thief. As DT and RB says....your time will come. Safe the tears for later idiot cause I personally don't give a flying fuck what what will happen to you.

Be my guest.

[vaughanwilliams]

"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

No, it isn't.

[Get Real!]

"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

No, it isn't.

The piglets were taken to court weren't they? They are financially ruined from legal costs, they are starring at losing everything in the face, their marriage is probably on the verge of collapse (mind you, they’re so ugly we’re doing them both a favor!), and the “TRNC” GC property prostitution has taken a nosedive!

What more do you want?

[vaughanwilliams]

[quote="vaughanwilliams"]"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

No, it isn't.

The piglets were taken to court weren't they? They are financially ruined from legal costs, they are starring at losing everything in the face, their marriage is probably on the verge of collapse (mind you, they’re so ugly we’re doing them both a favor!), and the “TRNC” GC property prostitution has taken a nosedive!

What more do you want? [/quote]

If you had been paying attention you would know that the original post was
"I live in a perfectly legally acquired house, according to the laws of the de facto government of the TRNC. If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."
The question asked has nothing to do with the Orams.

[Viewpoint]

[quote="vaughanwilliams"]"If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."

Why is it none of you will address this point?

Isn’t that what they did with the Orams piglets?

No, it isn't.

The piglets were taken to court weren't they? They are financially ruined from legal costs, they are starring at losing everything in the face, their marriage is probably on the verge of collapse (mind you, they’re so ugly we’re doing them both a favor!), and the “TRNC” GC property prostitution has taken a nosedive!

What more do you want?

If you had been paying attention you would know that the original post was
"I live in a perfectly legally acquired house, according to the laws of the de facto government of the TRNC. If you think they shouldn't have allowed me to buy it, maybe you should take it up with them at your earliest opportunity."
The question asked has nothing to do with the Orams.[/quote]

The cost is being met by Turkey and the EXpats who reisde in the TRNC and they are unlikely to have hand back the property in the TRNC, the only risk is the property in the UK which as far as we are aware is in a trust if not then we will see what will happens, we anticipate the decision will be to postpone till a solution is found but if it goes wrong then the Brits and TCsliving in the UK will have to take the necessary precaustions so they are not exposed to losing their assets in the UK or elsewhere in Europe.

[Malapapa]

Yes and from now on clear advice on making sure people put all their EU assets into some kind of trust to avoid losing them in the courts, can be explained to potential buyers in all your dodgy estate agent brochures. Problem solved.

Let the selling on the cheap of other people's property to greedy, gullible Brits continue!