Expatkiwi wrote:Malapapa wrote:Perhaps outsiders need to show a little more compassion for the aspirations of the vast majority of the island's proud people. I wouldn't advocate the dismemberment of any sovereign country if its people were dead-set against it.
If the rationale for being against it wasn't dead wrong, then perhaps I would be more sympathetic.
The rationale for the Cypriot people not wanting their country dismembered is not dead wrong; it's the same as for any other people.
Expatkiwi wrote:The phrase "Greek Island" to describe Cyprus certainly is far from being dead and buried in the past,
Perhaps, but Enosis is not being pursued by any mainstream political party in either Greece or Cyprus. (Even though political parties in the north and presumably Turkey still advocate Taksim). This is no reason for why an outsider should be arguing to dismember Cyprus which is now in the EU and a partner of Greece.
Expatkiwi wrote:and given a basic human trait called "revenge", don't you think that the Turkish Cypriots wouldn't exactly be expecting hugs and kisses from the Greek Cypriot side?
I think this is what viewpoint is alluding to when he bangs on about "safeguards". Clearly he has a guilty conscience. I think this fear is exaggerated given how few such revenge acts have taken place since the Green Line was opened.
This, again, is no reason for why an outsider should be arguing for the dismemberment of Cyprus; although I accept that reunification needs to be a process rather than a single act, to minimise incidences of revenge and to allay people's fears.
Expatkiwi wrote: "Cyprus for Cypriots" sounds great and ideal, but when there are differing ideas as to what constitutes a Cypriot, the ideal gets rapidly flushed down the toilet...
The definition of a Cypriot is one eligible for Cypriot citizenship. End of story.