
The above bear uncanny resemblance in my opinion to these:-
Evridiki Theokleous (Greek Cypriot


And unknown guy (looks like a Greek from Cyprus or Greece but could be any other European) looks like Ra Hotep.

Oracle wrote:Yialousa dear ... it shouldn't come as a surprise that since we left Africa some 60,000 years ago and spread via Egypt across the middle east, up through Greece and all the way to Scandinavia and Britain, that our darker features lightened. But, their is a continuum, a gradation of, at one end, Negroid features; and the other extreme virtually albino-ish. So, there will be mixtures in all the groups depending on which European region they stabilised their populations within. Greeks, being somewhat in the centre, will retain features common to North Africans as well as the more Germanic looks.
That's not to say there weren't later groups radiating back south, who look more northern within the middle east and north Africa ...
yialousa1971 wrote:Oracle wrote:Yialousa dear ... it shouldn't come as a surprise that since we left Africa some 60,000 years ago and spread via Egypt across the middle east, up through Greece and all the way to Scandinavia and Britain, that our darker features lightened. But, their is a continuum, a gradation of, at one end, Negroid features; and the other extreme virtually albino-ish. So, there will be mixtures in all the groups depending on which European region they stabilised their populations within. Greeks, being somewhat in the centre, will retain features common to North Africans as well as the more Germanic looks.
That's not to say there weren't later groups radiating back south, who look more northern within the middle east and north Africa ...
Albinism has nothing to do with race, they exist in the Negroe world (sub saharan Africa) and the Caucasian world (Europe, Middle east and North Africa). Much confusion on your part here but I'm here to help
, remember when I told you about the races. The forth race is where your getting confused, there are no in betweens (Ethiopians,somalians, Afro Caribbeans-Afro Americans and Indians are recent mixed races but more ancient for Indians), these are the forth race.
The ancient Egyptians were Mediterraneans, a sub race of the Caucasian race. 60,000 years I thought it was 100,000 years or was it 30,000 years. It keeps changing, Oracle burn those books by Hawkins, Dawkins etc.Fellow me I'm the light.
Oracle wrote:yialousa1971 wrote:Oracle wrote:Yialousa dear ... it shouldn't come as a surprise that since we left Africa some 60,000 years ago and spread via Egypt across the middle east, up through Greece and all the way to Scandinavia and Britain, that our darker features lightened. But, their is a continuum, a gradation of, at one end, Negroid features; and the other extreme virtually albino-ish. So, there will be mixtures in all the groups depending on which European region they stabilised their populations within. Greeks, being somewhat in the centre, will retain features common to North Africans as well as the more Germanic looks.
That's not to say there weren't later groups radiating back south, who look more northern within the middle east and north Africa ...
Albinism has nothing to do with race, they exist in the Negroe world (sub saharan Africa) and the Caucasian world (Europe, Middle east and North Africa). Much confusion on your part here but I'm here to help
, remember when I told you about the races. The forth race is where your getting confused, there are no in betweens (Ethiopians,somalians, Afro Caribbeans-Afro Americans and Indians are recent mixed races but more ancient for Indians), these are the forth race.
The ancient Egyptians were Mediterraneans, a sub race of the Caucasian race. 60,000 years I thought it was 100,000 years or was it 30,000 years. It keeps changing, Oracle burn those books by Hawkins, Dawkins etc.Fellow me I'm the light.
I used the term albino-ish not because I think "albinos" are a separate race; just as I used the term Negroid not as a separate race. They were descriptive of the type of morphological features we develop to suit our environment and they do NOT separate people into "races". That's why I said there was a continuum of these environmentally acquired features running from Africa to Scandinavia.
Get over it Yialousa ... we are all too similar to be classified into races. But as Humans, we can be classified according to our behaviour. This is where some groups of people can collectively follow inhuman ways of life (e.g. Turks). The good thing is, these behavioural traits can be changed within a generation or two.
yialousa1971 wrote:First of all races do exist, now get over it!This thread is not about this thou, there will be another about that called not out of Africa or something.
As to the Turks savage behaviour that will never change, does a leopard change its spots?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests