Cyprus-Forum.com

[YFred]

It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.

You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?

Who invited u to Cyprus? When we came to Cyprus we had problems with catholics not with Orthodox.

Nope ... you had a problem with EVERYONE and anyone who stood in the way of your barbaric expansions!

Insan. she was never invited, she invaded just like her hero Sikandra the terrible.

[-mikkie2-]

"This article in Pakistan's DAILY TIMES speaks volumes as to whose fault the current impasse is... "

Hmm, the world renowned DAILY TIMES of Pakistan carries such weight in international journalism that it will have governments all over the world scurrying round to change their policies becasue the EU was wrong to let Cyprus join the block according to them.

Does Pakistan harbour notions of joining the EU?

[runaway]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

[Oracle]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

You seem to have problems with individuality and to juggle two different situations in your tiny mind!

"Cyprus is a particular case and we do not have to imitate processes that were followed in the past."
Mr Kyprianou RoC FM

[runaway]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

You seem to have problems with individuality and to juggle two different situations in your tiny mind!

"Cyprus is a particular case and we do not have to imitate processes that were followed in the past."
Mr Kyprianou RoC FM

I was talking about Kosova brainless grandma. Tell me why Kosova is not recognized by your fake country if it is a totally different case.

[Oracle]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

You seem to have problems with individuality and to juggle two different situations in your tiny mind!

"Cyprus is a particular case and we do not have to imitate processes that were followed in the past."
Mr Kyprianou RoC FM

I was talking about Kosova brainless grandma. Tell me why Kosova is not recognized by your fake country if it is a totally different case.

Exactly! You were trying to draw parallels between Kosovo and Cyprus and I'm telling you there are none. Cyprus is a special case, as the quote by Kyprianou states. The non-recognition of Kosovo has nothing to do with the Cyprus Problem; so why are you bringing it up? Piratis showed you the historical and political differences. Yet you insist there are parallels and yet have presented none!

[runaway]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

You seem to have problems with individuality and to juggle two different situations in your tiny mind!

"Cyprus is a particular case and we do not have to imitate processes that were followed in the past."
Mr Kyprianou RoC FM

I was talking about Kosova brainless grandma. Tell me why Kosova is not recognized by your fake country if it is a totally different case.

Exactly! You were trying to draw parallels between Kosovo and Cyprus and I'm telling you there are none. Cyprus is a special case, as the quote by Kyprianou states. The non-recognition of Kosovo has nothing to do with the Cyprus Problem; so why are you bringing it up? Piratis showed you the historical and political differences. Yet you insist there are parallels and yet have presented none!

Still no explanation for the non-recognition of the independent Albanian state of Kosova. Here are the parallel straight lines:
Serbs killed Albanians and gcs killed TCs.

[GeorgeV97qaue]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.

TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.

TCs will NOT be a minority under your command.

Shut up you stupid turk. What do you know?

[GeorgeV97qaue]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.

Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.

So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.

Why don't south cyprus and Greece recognize Kosovo then? Because of the similarities between two cases maybe eh?

You seem to have problems with individuality and to juggle two different situations in your tiny mind!

"Cyprus is a particular case and we do not have to imitate processes that were followed in the past."
Mr Kyprianou RoC FM

I was talking about Kosova brainless grandma. Tell me why Kosova is not recognized by your fake country if it is a totally different case.

Exactly! You were trying to draw parallels between Kosovo and Cyprus and I'm telling you there are none. Cyprus is a special case, as the quote by Kyprianou states. The non-recognition of Kosovo has nothing to do with the Cyprus Problem; so why are you bringing it up? Piratis showed you the historical and political differences. Yet you insist there are parallels and yet have presented none!

Still no explanation for the non-recognition of the independent Albanian state of Kosova. Here are the parallel straight lines:
Serbs killed Albanians and gcs killed TCs.

You forgot to add TMT killed TC's and GC's.

[Me Ed]

Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.

They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:

I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.

Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.

TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.

TCs will NOT be a minority under your command.

At least I agree with you on one thing ... that the TCs will ALWAYS be a minority under someone elses command.