The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Naughty Naughty, GC's

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:54 am

runaway wrote:Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs.

Those who can’t live with Greek Cypriots can always get a dingy and paddle back to wherever the hell they came from.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby insan » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:57 am

Malapapa wrote:
YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
insan wrote:
Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...


That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.

Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!


U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!

U will never learn and digest consociational democracy. :lol:


I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?

Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?


Thanks for that, YFred. Is this another example of consociational democracy, insan?


It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Get Real! » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:09 pm

insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.

You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby RAFAELLA » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:11 pm

YFred wrote:Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?


...and who is Tayip to give warnings? to who? to EU? :lol:
Please do pass this message to Tayip, the EU wannabe:
Sinek kucuktur, ama mide bulandirir.

YFred wrote:But did you understand the message or will you wait till the jets are over and then scream for help froooooooooooooom Johnny French and Italians?


It seems that there are some who can't get rid of their barbaric habits :?
User avatar
RAFAELLA
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 750
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:17 pm
Location: Refugee from Famagusta - Turkish invasion '74

Postby halil » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:18 pm

Naughty Naughty, GC's................ :lol: :lol: :lol:

what they have been up to :?:

:wink:
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby insan » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:30 pm

Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.

You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?


Who invited u to Cyprus? :lol: When we came to Cyprus we had problems with catholics not with Orthodox. :wink:

Catholics used u as a shield when Ottomans were waring with Venetians. So ask to modern day descendants of Venetians for an apology that they used u as a shield against Ottomans and caused death of thousands of Orthodox.

When will u realize the facts and truths?
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby runaway » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:17 pm

Me Ed wrote:
runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.


They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:



I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic. 8)

Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.

TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.


TCs will NOT be a minority under your command.
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Piratis » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:18 pm

runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.


They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:



I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic. 8)


So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.


Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.


So where is the 1) Foreign invasion, 2) Ethnic Cleansing and 3) Illegal Settlement of the occupied territory with population of the occupier (which is against the Geneva Convention)? :roll: You failed to provide any similarity between the two cases.

But just because you are stupid (or you pretend to be) this doesn't mean everybody else is. This is why Kosovo was recognized by some countries right after it was declared, while your pseudo state which was illegally declared almost 3 decades ago is recognized by no other, and on the contrary there is a UN Resolution that declares the "trnc" as legally invalid. Can you find a similar UN resolution for Kosovo?

Kurdistan has 100 times more right for independence than Kosovo, and you have no right whatsoever to have a separate state on land which belongs to us by over 80%.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Piratis » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:27 pm

runaway wrote:
Me Ed wrote:
runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.


They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:



I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic. 8)

Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.

TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.


TCs will NOT be a minority under your command.


Why did you come to an island which had a Greek Cypriot majority for 1000s of years then? Or your plan was to commit genocide against us like you did against the native people in Asia Minor and become the majority in Cyprus as well?

Apparently this was your plan, and because British took Cyprus before you managed to finish off the job you started, you re-invaded Cyprus in 1974 to continue where you had left off during Ottoman rule, commiting yet more ethnic cleansings and genocides against the Cypriot people.

Unfortunately for you we are not living in the middle ages any more, and your criminal practices can not be accepted in the 21st century.

You should have harried up and finished off your genocide against us during the Ottoman rule, but if you did that then you wouldn't be able to collect taxes and use the Cypriot people as slaves.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Oracle » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:31 pm

insan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.

You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?


Who invited u to Cyprus? :lol: When we came to Cyprus we had problems with catholics not with Orthodox. :wink:



Nope ... you had a problem with EVERYONE and anyone who stood in the way of your barbaric expansions!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests