runaway wrote:Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs.
Those who can’t live with Greek Cypriots can always get a dingy and paddle back to wherever the hell they came from.
runaway wrote:Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs.
Malapapa wrote:YFred wrote:Malapapa wrote:insan wrote:Oracle wrote:insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...
That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.
Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!
U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!
U will never learn and digest consociational democracy.
I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?
Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?
Thanks for that, YFred. Is this another example of consociational democracy, insan?
insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.
YFred wrote:Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?
YFred wrote:But did you understand the message or will you wait till the jets are over and then scream for help froooooooooooooom Johnny French and Italians?
Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.
You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?
Me Ed wrote:runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.
They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:
I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.
Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.
TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.
runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.
They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:
I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.
So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?
If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.
The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.
If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.
Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.
runaway wrote:Me Ed wrote:runaway wrote:Piratis wrote:Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.
They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:
I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic.
Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.
TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.
TCs will NOT be a minority under your command.
insan wrote:Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:It is.. but the veto right of consociationally democratic groups(minor or major) must be rational; take into account the interets of all other relevant political groups too... When consociationally democratic group(minor or major) abuse their veto right and try to harm the interests of other groups(minor or major) invite the conflict and seperation.
You shouldn’t be entitled to any rights because you came here uninvited and committed mass atrocities. When do you plan to apologize for all that?
Who invited u to Cyprus? When we came to Cyprus we had problems with catholics not with Orthodox.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests