The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Naughty Naughty, GC's

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Piratis » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:20 am

Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus? As long as u exert making TCs a minority in Cyprus, problem won't be solved as how u desire. As usual u just contribute the partition of Cyprus. This time the permenant partition...


I am not trying to make TCs a minority. The Turks made the Greeks and the other native people in Asia Minor a minority (and themselves the majority) by commiting genocides and ethnic cleansing. This is what you also did in north Cyprus since 1974.

I don't want any of that. I don't want to make you anything that you are not already. It is you who is illegally trying to change the demographics of Cyprus by means of ethnic cleansing and the transfer of 10s of thousands of Anatolian Settlers to our island.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby YFred » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:22 am

Malapapa wrote:
insan wrote:
Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...


That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.

Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!


U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!

U will never learn and digest consociational democracy. :lol:


I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?

Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Piratis » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:26 am

YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
insan wrote:
Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...


That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.

Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!


U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!

U will never learn and digest consociational democracy. :lol:


I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?

Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?


And Turkey can not illegally occupy 1/3rd of an EU member state. If they do, then their 70 million Anatolians have no kind of vote in EU, while Cypriots, who are EU citizens, do.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Malapapa » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:26 am

YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
insan wrote:
Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...


That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.

Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!


U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!

U will never learn and digest consociational democracy. :lol:


I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?

Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?


Thanks for that, YFred. Is this another example of consociational democracy, insan?
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby YFred » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:29 am

Piratis wrote:
YFred wrote:
Malapapa wrote:
insan wrote:
Oracle wrote:
insan wrote:Which UN resolution suggests TCs to accept minority status in Cyprus?...


That's just it. No one told the TCs they have to accept minority status just as no one told the GCs they have to accept majority status! Some things just are because of numbers and this particular quirk, such as a fixed "community" size, is irrelevant and does not enter into one-man-one-vote Democracies.

Now bugger off back to undemocratic Turkey and claim your 'majority status' over there!


U bugger off to Greece and demand ur one man one vote right over there!

U will never learn and digest consociational democracy. :lol:


I digested it. Like the EU, where tiny little Cyprus - and its tiny little minority of European citizens - has a veto over Turkey's entry. You like?

Well that's alright than, next time they hit you with a sledge hammer you can veto it to your heart’s content old chap.
Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?


And Turkey can not illegally occupy 1/3rd of an EU member state. If they do, then their 70 million Anatolians have no kind of vote in EU, while Cypriots, who are EU citizens, do.

But did you understand the message or will you wait till the jets are over and then scream for help froooooooooooooom Johnny French and Italians?
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby Get Real! » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:35 am

YFred wrote:Erdogan did give an explicit warning. He said 800 thousand people cannot hold 70 million to ransom. Do you understand the message?

Yeah, tell him that these aren't any old 800,000 people… they’re Cypriots who have seen many fools come and go. :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Malapapa » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:36 am

Europeans don't take kindly to crude threats, YFred. Where did you learn to be so nasty and vicious - and to use blackmail to try and get your way? And when that doesn't work, stamp your feet and say "it's not fair"? Trahon university?
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby Get Real! » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:41 am

YFred wrote:But did you understand the message or will you wait till the jets are over and then scream for help froooooooooooooom Johnny French and Italians?

That should just trigger the Cyprus-wide S2A systems and then someone else will cry with every pop! The TAF is not the USAF so don't get confused... :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby runaway » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:42 am

Piratis wrote:
runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.


They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:



I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic. 8)


So which foreign country invaded Kosovo, ethnically cleansed the Serbians and illegally transferred Albanians in Kosovo?

If you don't see a difference, then you should be able to give an answer to all of the above.

The fact is that the Albanians have been a majority in that territory for centuries, long before International Law and the UN.

If you want to go that back ago, then why go to Kosovo? You can talk about Asia Minor, which was taken by the Turks from the Greeks and the other native people. But I will remind you that today is the 21st century, and your middle age practices of genocide and ethnic cleansing are not acceptable anymore. Today you can not create a separate state by means of genocide and ethnic cleansing on land which belongs by over 80% to others.


Serbians say Kosovo was Serbian only land and Albanians were brought in by Tito.You're in contradiction with auntie Srbija south cypriot.
User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Me Ed » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:47 am

runaway wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Turkish Cyprus declared independence on November 15, 1983 and was immediately recognised by Turkey. No other country recognises North Cyprus, mainly because it has never sought formal recognition.


They sought recognition in all ways they could. But how could the rule of Turks recognized over territory which belongs to Cypriots? It can not. And this is why this resolution was issued:



I need to give the example of Kosovo again since you are not tired of writing shit. I don't see any difference between KKTC and Kosova cases. Albanians and Serbs can't and won't live together. Same is true for TC and gcs. Recognition is not a must since option of enosis with Türkiye seems more realistic. 8)

Runaway, perhaps YOU can't live with GCs, but don't tar all the TCs with this backward mentality.

TCs and GCs can live happily together, like the hundreds of thousands currently living happily together in London.
User avatar
Me Ed
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1787
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:24 pm
Location: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests