Unfortunately Bill it's not an official source, but personally reliable source.
Appreciate if don't trust info, happy to be proved wrong.
A.
YFred wrote:bill cobbett wrote:Here is an extract from one of the above cases which gives the only dissenting opinion, that from the Judge from Turkey who gives "nil points" to CY.
This biased judge from Turkey says ....
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKAŞ
"Unlike the majority, I consider that the objection of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies raised by the Government should not have been rejected. Consequently, I cannot agree with the finding of violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 8 of the Convention, for the same reasons as those mentioned in my dissenting opinion in the case of Gavriel v. Turkey (no. 41355/98, 20 January 2009)."
All the other eminent judges found that that Tnucland's Property Commision Scam was a load of pollocks.
Was the fact that roc did everything they could to prevent GCs from applying to the said commission taken into consideration by these brown tounge arse licking judges? Or were they looking the other way at the time?
Acikgoz wrote:Unfortunately Bill it's not an official source, but personally reliable source.
Appreciate if don't trust info, happy to be proved wrong.
A.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests