Talisker wrote:Paphitis wrote:Talisker wrote:Paphitis wrote:Talisker wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Lately I have been pondering a lot about 'Human Rights'. I happened to remember the arrest of the PKK leader Ocalan and the furore from Human Rights groups who complained of his detention without trial. This was the leader of an organisation 'allegedly' responsible for the brutal murder or Turkish citizens of both Turkish and Kurdish background. We all remember that the EU , Amnsty International all jumping up and down with their knickers in the air.
How quiet they are now. In Turkey there are hundreds of Turkish Army high ranking officers in jail for over a year without charge and some have been 'allegedly' undergone torture. What happened to Amnesty Int and Human Rights Activists. We know they have double standards but their silence is deafening. Perhaps Talisker has the answer.(in a different thread ofcourse
Let me be clear on this Deniz - you are condemning the human rights monitoring organisations and not the abusers? Your comparison is an odd one - even I knew about Ocalan before he was arrested - he was a high-profile individual, and therefore he was easy for Amnesty International and others to monitor, whereas the arrests of the military figures you mention is presumably an internal security matter which has received little publicity, certainly in comparison with the Ocalan arrest. Have they been arrested to prevent a military coup? Either way, you highlight very nicely the lack of human rights in Turkey, which, I'm sure, explains in large part the similar absence of such rights in the TRNC.
You make a very interesting point, but, human rights monitoring agencies seem to be politically motivcated and lacking integrity.
I say this because they rightfully condemn Saudi Arabia for Sharia Law public beheadings, Iran for pubic lynchings, the US for Camp X Ray, and so on and so on. But when you study these human rights monitoring groups, you will notice that some countries (which actually set HR benchmarks but are not perfect) have HR rap sheets for merely incarcerating illegal immigrants, who have claimed asylum and are awaiting an immigration inquiry which could grant them asylum or have them deported. What do they expect? What else do they expect?
And yet, Deniz also raises a very interesting point. The fact that some Turkish Officers are being held in prison without being charged, without a trial and are being tortured, is a very noteworthy HR violation, which these HR agencies don't seem to be interested in. Organizations such as Amnesty International are a farce. I apologize for my cynicism.
I disagree. These organisations may not be perfect but the world would be a poorer place without them.
I agree with the fact hat these HR agencies serve a very worthwhile purpose, and the world would indeed be a poorer place without them. This is because they actually do a lot of good in monitoring HR violations all over the world, and they raise public awareness as well as pressure those countries that violate HR to bring about change.
However, the fact that some HR violations go unnoticed, whilst other countries are being condemned (because these left wing groups want to sling mud against those countries for politically motivated reasons) when there is no case to answer, will only
undermine them.
Thanks for providing the link in your edited post regarding arrests of Turkish military officers.
Why do you assume HR organisations must have 'left wing' leanings and motivations for their actions?
Whilst participating in the Cyprus Forum, I have spent many hours researching various factual HR violations by Turkey and it puppet regime, the "trnc". Whilst doing this, you also come to the realisation that there is no nation in the world that is completely immune from alleged HR violations. Some countries are extreme violators of HR, such as Iran, North Korea, China, Saudi Arabia and many more. Others commit very minor HR violations and are more or less those who set HR benchmarks. The EU, Australia, Canada, New Zealand are few examples of such countries.
However, in Australia, HR agencies have lost much credibility, because of their very vocal opposition to Australia's Pacific Solution. During this time, you would have thought that Australia was a tin pot, fascistic, Middle Eastern or West African nation. The Amnesty International rent a crowd was cutting barbed wire at Immigration Detention facilities, were generally behaving like first class clowns trying to bring down a system that was obviously working for Australia, and stopping illegal immigration dead in its tracks. These adverse HR reports were politically motivated against a Government that became the most popular administration in Australian political history. And yet, once again, Amnesty International is not quite as vocal about Australia sending 76 asylum seekers to Indonesia, a country which has a similarly deplorable HR record to Turkey.
Many here feel that these groups are far too
inconsistent, and are very
selective of picking their stance against various nations. Some of their reports are bordering the ridiculous.