RAFAELLA wrote:YFred wrote:Well you may well say that, but it's only greeks on this forum that keep talking about Cyprus and Turkey is greek and they are going to take it back. -Well, if you go back in history the Greek presence on the island is dating back to 1100 BC, so, I guess this doesn't make Cyprus Japanese, does it?- As a TC I have no other ambition -You may have no ambition as a Tc but your motherland definitely has- , like you I just want my land -You can have your land any time you want, CyR didn't usurp your land, CyR didn't sell your land to foreighners etc. Here is our deference, your land is safeguarded and nobody deny's that you are the legal owner whereas my land is occupied by turkish troops-Turkey which deny the fact that I am the legal owner and has no right to sell it. Not only that, Turkey violates one of my basic human rights by denying access to my own property- and I would like to say get on with our lives which applies to my family in Cyprus, I personally have made a good life in London. So I think it is a little exagurated to say that the Turks have a megali Ithea, certainly they will protect their economic interests in the med. -Their interests in the Med? You mean their illegalities in the Med.-We have to learn to live and let live, otherwise it will lead to war and with war nobody wins.
You see that is where your argument falls appart. You can't go back 5 years never mind 1000 years. It's about today, and tomorrow not yesterday.
I fail to see what difference it makes to you holding my land, safeguarding it but not giving it back. There is really no difference. With peace agreement, most people will get what they want.
But not all. If you want all, nobody will get anything.
Yes med interests. Turkey has a thousand mile med coast and will claim some of the minerals and has the power to do so. If you don't play ball, like Greece you will not get to them either. You either grow up and share or you behave like a spoilt child and loose all.
It's very simple.