by cannedmoose » Thu Jul 14, 2005 5:52 pm
Folks, we all know today that colonial exploitation was wrong, whether it be by Venetians, Genoans, Ottomans or British. In the modern world, for one people to be subject to another against their will is to deny them the rights and freedoms they deserve as fellow human beings. That being said, our ancestors did not view things in this way, this way of thinking is largely a product of the last fifty years but can be witnessed as far back as 1832 when slavery was abolished throughout the British empire.
In general, Ottoman rule was not benevolent, it was a conqueror-subject relationship, with Cyprus providing resources and manpower without a great deal in return. However, compared to previous rulers, Ottoman rule did provide some Cypriots with opportunities (not just Muslim Cypriots) and allowed contact between Greek-speaking people across the Eastern Mediterranean, Cypriots were by no means isolated from 1571 to 1878.
The Cypriot Brotherhood in Alexandria retained strong links with other Orthodox orders across the Mediterranean and beyond and funded many Orthodox schools in Cyprus. Cypriot merchants traded across the Levant (evidenced by there being three times as many speakers of fluent Arabic as speakers of English even in 1911), agricultural workers found seasonal work in Anatolia, many Christian Cypriot moneylenders and masons amassed huge fortunes working in Cairo, and large numbers of Cypriots settled elsewhere within the Ottoman realm. However, it is also true that Christian Cypriots were heavily taxed, were not free to govern their own affairs (although the Church did have a channel of direct communication to the island's governor), and the Ottomans did not develop the island so much as asset strip its wealth for return to Istanbul.
Therefore there are swings and roundabouts. Few things are totally black and white and the Ottoman occupation of Cyprus, although mostly dark grey, is not as complete a dark picture as many people like to portray it.
Before replying, please note the statement I made at the beginning. I am not an apologist for the Ottomans, I am simply stating an opinion based upon historical evidence.