Acikgoz wrote:Keep saying NO, can't think of a better way to keep us apart, which is necessary given the malicious racism that exists in the South.
No.
Malapapa wrote:insan wrote:The solution of complicated issues r complicated too and if u sincerely wish to solve them u need to work hard on a complicated solution plan with a dialectic perspective. U have no sufficient IQ for this?
Don't you read what is posted before writing more drivel?
It doesn't help that Turkey's actions have made the problem more and more and more complicated. And this suggests, to anyone with a sufficient IQ, that it's never really wanted a solution.
Jerry wrote:This would be the perfect opportunity for the ROC to reveal the flaws in the 1960 Constitution. Christofias could insist that universally accepted principles are applied to the formation of a new State otherwise he would, with justification, walk awy from the talks. It's difficult to see how those present could legitimately counter this.
YFred wrote:Jerry wrote:This would be the perfect opportunity for the ROC to reveal the flaws in the 1960 Constitution. Christofias could insist that universally accepted principles are applied to the formation of a new State otherwise he would, with justification, walk awy from the talks. It's difficult to see how those present could legitimately counter this.
The meeting will be the golden cage, they will shackel him in there which is why he is refusing to go.
Constitution is what it is. Unless both parties agree, it cannot be changed. That was the constitution. Did you really think you can just tear it up and get away with it?
I give it to you, you almost did, but not quite.
It was a rather unconvincing excuse, even though he repeated it yesterday, saying a five-party meeting means “two communities; it means the downgrading of the Cyprus Republic which cannot be accepted.”
Acikgoz wrote:Jerry, you bring up interesting points, however Christofias cannot simply say 1960 not feasible, forced into it, universally accepted principles and all that chaps...
Political and social realities, histories etc dictate that Cyprus is a special case.
Note the numerous international issues of countires that have broken up, reformed back and forth.
Still you have to come down to realities which is why the bi-communal/bi-zonal is a must. Special status is essential. Greece with the recent wall must come down in Cyprus when celebrating the Berlin wall is so flawed with the comparison that the two are akin.
Reality based resolution is the only good long term solution.
Think businesses, conglomerates, mergers. Sounds like a good idea, I'll build my business, the bigger it is and I'm the chairperson then the more I'll get out of it, jobs for my boys whatever your goals. However, if you don't work the synergies or they are too expensive or politically unfeasible then you will have a dysfunctional company, you will make losses and destroy wealth and the shareholders in the long run will suffer.
1960 was a crock, but so was 1963, 1974 etc. still everyone trying to fit round peg into square hole without actually caring that they continue to break the toy with sweeping statements that ignore the realities.
Expatkiwi wrote:YFred wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:RoCy should look at the positive aspects. They would at least be talking to Turkey directly, and they could always refer to the TRNC delegation as the "Turkish Cypriot Community of Cyprus", if it will make them feel better...
You must not assume that GC Administration has any imagination. Zilch, I am afraid.
That wouldn't surprise me...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest